Top 100 Prospects Baseball America 10'
#1
Posted February 23, 2010 - 11:12 PM
#20 Logan Morrison
#78 Chad James
-Note: Matt Dominguez was dropped from top 100. He was #64 in 2009.
http://www.baseballa...ospects/?p=7539
#3
Posted February 23, 2010 - 11:30 PM
#4
Posted February 23, 2010 - 11:37 PM
MarlinsLou, on February 23, 2010 - 11:30 PM, said:
Edit: I agree with you. His glove should get him in even if its late 100's.
#5
Posted February 23, 2010 - 11:44 PM
Quote
I still think if you give him time to develope his bat will come around.
#6
Posted February 24, 2010 - 12:55 AM
B1az3, on February 23, 2010 - 11:44 PM, said:
Quote
I still think if you give him time to develope his bat will come around.
His BB rate has improved every level and he doesn't strike out at insulting rates. As long as you're putting the ball in play good things will happen. There is certainly projectable power in his bat too. You can't fault him for the dip in HR in Jupiter. He still hit a fair amount of XBH and murdered A+ the last few weeks he was there. Oh, and he is 19 years old. He could spend all of 2010 in AA, and all of 2011 and 2012 in AAA, and be 24 years old. Which is how old Chris Coghlan was in 2009.
He's way to young and projectable to drop off a prospect list. He could skyrocket if he hits even a little bit this year. I don't know if he'll ever be this huge monster hitter, but a worst case scenario is what, Brandon Inge? Pedro Feliz? And that isn't a bad starter. Just not a great one. And amazing for club controlled prices.
But hey. We'll see what happens. Chris Coghlan wasn't good enough for BA last year too.
#7
Posted February 24, 2010 - 02:39 AM
MarlinsLou, on February 24, 2010 - 12:55 AM, said:
B1az3, on February 23, 2010 - 11:44 PM, said:
Quote
I still think if you give him time to develope his bat will come around.
His BB rate has improved every level and he doesn't strike out at insulting rates. As long as you're putting the ball in play good things will happen. There is certainly projectable power in his bat too. You can't fault him for the dip in HR in Jupiter. He still hit a fair amount of XBH and murdered A+ the last few weeks he was there. Oh, and he is 19 years old. He could spend all of 2010 in AA, and all of 2011 and 2012 in AAA, and be 24 years old. Which is how old Chris Coghlan was in 2009.
He's way to young and projectable to drop off a prospect list. He could skyrocket if he hits even a little bit this year. I don't know if he'll ever be this huge monster hitter, but a worst case scenario is what, Brandon Inge? Pedro Feliz? And that isn't a bad starter. Just not a great one. And amazing for club controlled prices.
But hey. We'll see what happens. Chris Coghlan wasn't good enough for BA last year too.
Dominguez is actually 20 going on 21. I only know because '89 is the same year I was born. Although your point, I believe, still remains valid.
Secondly, does anyone know how they (the people who come up with the rankings) take into account a player adjusting to a new level of play? What variables are calculated? I find it a little premature to remove Dominguez from the 100 top prospect list after 2009.
#8
Posted February 24, 2010 - 08:22 AM
#9
Posted February 24, 2010 - 09:02 AM
#11
Posted February 24, 2010 - 11:24 AM
ctina2277, on February 24, 2010 - 02:39 AM, said:
MarlinsLou, on February 24, 2010 - 12:55 AM, said:
B1az3, on February 23, 2010 - 11:44 PM, said:
Quote
I still think if you give him time to develope his bat will come around.
His BB rate has improved every level and he doesn't strike out at insulting rates. As long as you're putting the ball in play good things will happen. There is certainly projectable power in his bat too. You can't fault him for the dip in HR in Jupiter. He still hit a fair amount of XBH and murdered A+ the last few weeks he was there. Oh, and he is 19 years old. He could spend all of 2010 in AA, and all of 2011 and 2012 in AAA, and be 24 years old. Which is how old Chris Coghlan was in 2009.
He's way to young and projectable to drop off a prospect list. He could skyrocket if he hits even a little bit this year. I don't know if he'll ever be this huge monster hitter, but a worst case scenario is what, Brandon Inge? Pedro Feliz? And that isn't a bad starter. Just not a great one. And amazing for club controlled prices.
But hey. We'll see what happens. Chris Coghlan wasn't good enough for BA last year too.
Dominguez is actually 20 going on 21. I only know because '89 is the same year I was born. Although your point, I believe, still remains valid.
Secondly, does anyone know how they (the people who come up with the rankings) take into account a player adjusting to a new level of play? What variables are calculated? I find it a little premature to remove Dominguez from the 100 top prospect list after 2009.
Dominguez was born Aug 28, 1989, so he was 19 for basically the entire 2009 season. But yes, either way it's still young and it doesn't matter if it takes him till he is 24/25 to become a MLB player. It happening sooner is a bonus.
All variables are considered. It's a completely subjective list weighing performance, level and competition, age, park factors, mechanics, "tools," anticipated progression, likelihood to succeed, you name it. Per Dominguez, he was left off most likely because the scouts think he has a big hole in his swing that will prevent consistent contact, and this was clearly exposed during his initial 150 PA in Jacksonville/Arizona.
#12
Posted February 24, 2010 - 11:47 AM
Eddie Altamonte, on February 24, 2010 - 09:04 AM, said:
You always want to rush prospects to fast. Unless Dominguez looks like he can be the starter in 2011, which is doubtful, the Marlins have no reason to bring him up which has the side effect of putting him on the 40 man roster. We have a ton of pitching prospects to protect this upcoming year in the Rule V, so every last spot is going to count.
Assuming Cantu and Helms leave for FA, and the team trades Ross, Uggla, and Pinto...
C - Baker, Paulino, Hayes
1B - G. Sanchez, Morrison
2B - Coghlan, Bonifacio
SS - Hanley
3B - Jimenez
OF - Maybin, Petersen, Cousins, Jai, Carroll
SP - Johnson, Nolasco, Anibal, Volstad, West, A. Miller, Sanabia, Winters, G. Taylor, Allison
RP - Nunez, Vanden Hurk, Tucker, Ceda, Meyer, H. Jones, Tankeresley, Badenhop, Buente, Harvey, Leroux, C. Martinez, Sinkbiel, Wood, Cishek, Voss, Parcell
This is at 40 right now, and just looking at what kind of roster we could create from this, we'd need a veteran 3B, a veteran outfielder, a veteran bat, more organizational depth at 2B/SS, and we'd be getting back legit almost ready players back for Ross and Uggla. We could easily see this list of "should be protected" grow to close to 50 guys.
And sure, we could trade Nunez for payroll, or just not protect people like Graham, Allison, whichever 5 RP don't work, Carroll, Jai, Jimenez isn't around, etc to get to 40, but you're going to have to start sacrificing arms to rush Dominguez, and Stanton, to the majors. Why do that? I mean if they force their way into the starting lineup with crazy AA years this year, so be it. But that is asking for a lot.
I think they should stay exclusively in the minors all of 2010 no matter what happens so we can preserve as many arms as possible. There is no need to rush them. I still feel 2012 is the target year.
#14
Posted February 25, 2010 - 12:06 AM
#15
Posted February 25, 2010 - 12:14 AM
#16
#17
Posted February 25, 2010 - 11:46 AM
Erick, on February 25, 2010 - 04:04 AM, said:
I have no idea. I'd think they keep this entire team together until at least the trade deadline and see where they are.


Help

Back to top
MultiQuote















