MarlinsBaseball.com: The trade that thankfully didn't happen... - MarlinsBaseball.com

Jump to content

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

The trade that thankfully didn't happen...

#1 User is offline   PBCMarlinsFan 

  • Killjoy
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,635
  • Joined: November 28, 2005

Posted March 11, 2010 - 12:52 AM

Here is a snippet from an article on Rangers GM Jon Daniels. I included the relevant part for Marlins fans. Thank god Daniels didn't pull the trigger on this deal.

Quote

Almost immediately after Daniels moved into a bigger office at Rangers Ballpark in Arlington, he was presented with an intriguing offer. Florida Marlins owner Jeffrey Loria approached Hicks at the owners meetings and told him starter Josh Beckett wanted to go back to Texas.

"He gave me the players they wanted," Hicks said. "He was leaving the country and wanted the deal done before then. There wasn't a lot of time."

The Marlins wanted third baseman Hank Blalock and either Thomas Diamond or John Danks for Beckett and third baseman Mike Lowell. Florida ended up asking for Danks over Diamond in the package.

"I think Jon got bogged down trying to build a consensus with too many people," Hicks said. "You have to get enough input to make a decision, but he took too long, and the time period for the deal went away."

Hart said Daniels was trying to simply understand his own guys, and the timing was difficult given that it was a big decision so quickly.

"It was trying to balance how much you covet and desire Beckett and not desiring Lowell's money at the time," Hart said. "He was also trying to figure out how the organization felt about Danks. If that happened today, he'd have a complete knowledge of everyone in our system and clearer picture of the economics. I know he wanted to make the deal, but he was being cautious."

Daniels admits that he was slow to pull the trigger. He also didn't understand Marlins general manager Larry Beinfest's style, which is to put his best offer on the table right away. The Marlins ended up dealing with the Red Sox and got Hanley Ramirez as part of the trade.


The rest can be read here http://sports.espn.g...hard&id=4976186

#2 User is offline   Mike 

  • RIP James/Jimmy Owen "The Rev" Sullivan
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,634
  • Joined: July 9, 2004
  • Location:Florida
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 11, 2010 - 12:54 AM

Wow.. hah

#3 User is offline   Marlins2003 

  • All Star
  • Group: VIP
  • Posts: 13,611
  • Joined: January 20, 2003
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 11, 2010 - 01:54 AM

and for those agnostics out there I say...you doubt there is a God? lolol :brigginbounce

not to mention the way Theo being absent and Larry Lucchino carried the ball negotiating away Ramirez makes you want to consider the real possibility of divine intervention. Things do happen for a reason. I only met a baseball gods once and he was a really good guy. And he was wearing a Marlins cap.

#4 User is offline   Dr Beinfest 

  • Zephyr
  • Group: VIP
  • Posts: 2,358
  • Joined: April 11, 2008
  • Location:Delray Beach
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 11, 2010 - 04:00 PM

View PostPBCMarlinsFan, on March 11, 2010 - 12:52 AM, said:

Here is a snippet from an article on Rangers GM Jon Daniels. I included the relevant part for Marlins fans. Thank god Daniels didn't pull the trigger on this deal.

Quote

Daniels admits that he was slow to pull the trigger. He also didn't understand Marlins general manager Larry Beinfest's style, which is to put his best offer on the table right away. The Marlins ended up dealing with the Red Sox and got Hanley Ramirez as part of the trade.



It's called not beating around the bush. Cutting the crap. Getting straight to the point. What, did you expect him to dillydally and play games with you?

#5 User is offline   FutureGM 

  • All Star
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10,581
  • Joined: July 6, 2003
  • Location:Orlando, FL
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 11, 2010 - 04:49 PM

Too bad we couldn't have traded Miggy and D-Train there instead of to Detroit. I would have loved to have Danks. Diamond, not so much. But for awhile he was part of that highly touted trio of Texas prospects, the 'DVD': Danks, Volquez, and Diamond.

#6 User is online   dom2613 

  • Rookie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,505
  • Joined: July 5, 2008
  • Location:Coral Springs FL

Posted March 11, 2010 - 05:36 PM

View PostFutureGM, on March 11, 2010 - 04:49 PM, said:

Too bad we couldn't have traded Miggy and D-Train there instead of to Detroit. I would have loved to have Danks. Diamond, not so much. But for awhile he was part of that highly touted trio of Texas prospects, the 'DVD': Danks, Volquez, and Diamond.


I'm still holding out hope for Maybin. Miller not so much, maybe he could be a bull pen guy though.

#7 User is offline   MrMarlinPride 

  • The Baron has Returned.
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,407
  • Joined: July 8, 2008
  • Location:Weston, Florida
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 11, 2010 - 05:42 PM

In what year was this trade almost done?


#8 User is online   dom2613 

  • Rookie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,505
  • Joined: July 5, 2008
  • Location:Coral Springs FL

Posted March 11, 2010 - 06:20 PM

Wow, I'm watching MLB Tonight and Gammons just Said Andrew Miller has the highest SAT score of any player in the majors. Had no clue the kid was that smart. Figure out how to throw strikes.

#9 User is offline   dim 

  • The Punisher
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,573
  • Joined: March 30, 2008
  • Location:Coral Springs
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 11, 2010 - 07:18 PM

He was also a National Merit Scholar Finalist in 2003 for his PSAT score. I believe UNC said they would've offered him a 4 year scholarship simply on academics if they needed to.

Andrew Miller is one smart cookie. Can't throw a strike to save his life, but he is definitely book smart.

#10 User is offline   gizmo 

  • BALLGAME
  • Group: VIP
  • Posts: 2,808
  • Joined: July 1, 2008
  • Location:Orlando, FL
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 11, 2010 - 07:32 PM

View PostDim0615, on March 11, 2010 - 07:18 PM, said:

He was also a National Merit Scholar Finalist in 2003 for his PSAT score. I believe UNC said they would've offered him a 4 year scholarship simply on academics if they needed to.

Andrew Miller is one smart cookie.
Can't throw a strike to save his life, but he is definitely book smart.


Hopefully he's smart enough to realize that his career may be on the line and he should learn to be consistent.

#11 User is offline   Lane1974 

  • Sun
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 546
  • Joined: January 12, 2005
  • Location:Boca Raton, FL

Posted March 11, 2010 - 09:15 PM

I thought this thread was going to be about Stanton for Manny.


Should've been.

#12 User is offline   cornfield 

  • Hammerhead
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 303
  • Joined: October 13, 2008

Posted March 12, 2010 - 09:07 AM

How does the Marlins front office take credit for landing Hanley when they made their best effort not to get him? At least Danks has proven to be a good starter.

#13 User is offline   Puma 

  • Rookie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,661
  • Joined: October 14, 2007
  • Location:West Palm Beach, FL
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 12, 2010 - 11:23 AM

I think it's pretty fair to say we got raped in the Miguel Cabrera trade. Even if Cameron Maybin lives up to his "Mike Cameron" potential, he will never be nearly as valuable as Cabrera. Andrew Miller is a lost cause, Mike Rabelo is a minor league lifer, Eulogio De La Cruz is in San Diego, Dallas Trahern is an injured, aging prospect without much promise, and Burke Badenhop likely won't be anything more than a bullpen arm/mopup starter. You can't win them all. We kind of got lucky in the Hanley trade, so this kind of balances things out.

#14 User is offline   Piazza31 

  • I'm not inspired by the Media. I Inspire it.
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,280
  • Joined: August 20, 2006
  • Location:Miami, FL
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 12, 2010 - 03:38 PM

Cabrera is lucky we traded him.

It saved his life.

The rate he was eating at here in Miami, he might have suffered a Heart Attack jogging to first on a pop fly.

He was, and still is in my mind a Fat Sack of "Maurice Clarrett".

#15 User is offline   Schnellders 

  • Scotland's #1 Fish Fan
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,831
  • Joined: March 14, 2008
  • Location:Scotland
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 12, 2010 - 07:15 PM

Maybe a bit far fetched but if we did keep Cabrera he would of commanded a huge salary (as seen through what he receives as a Tiger) and maybe this means we would not have had the funds to lock up Hanley or JJ...

#16 User is offline   floridafly 

  • Hammerhead
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 435
  • Joined: August 21, 2009
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 12, 2010 - 08:23 PM

View PostDim0615, on March 11, 2010 - 07:18 PM, said:

He was also a National Merit Scholar Finalist in 2003 for his PSAT score. I believe UNC said they would've offered him a 4 year scholarship simply on academics if they needed to.

Andrew Miller is one smart cookie. Can't throw a strike to save his life, but he is definitely book smart.


I thought Ross Ohlendorf of the Pirates is the smartest player in the MLB. Well there is only one way to settle this...

A game of Scrabble!

#17 User is offline   Puma 

  • Rookie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,661
  • Joined: October 14, 2007
  • Location:West Palm Beach, FL
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 12, 2010 - 09:58 PM

View PostPiazza31, on March 12, 2010 - 03:38 PM, said:

He was, and still is in my mind a Fat Sack of "Maurice Clarrett".


What does that even mean?

Anyway...when you have a career .311 batting average and average 33 home runs a season, your weight is irrelevant.

#18 User is offline   Rabbethan 

  • Member of Captain Mitre's Pirate Crew
  • Group: VIP
  • Posts: 12,771
  • Joined: May 22, 2007
  • Location:Miami/Doral, Fl
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 12, 2010 - 10:26 PM

View PostSchnellders, on March 12, 2010 - 07:15 PM, said:

Maybe a bit far fetched but if we did keep Cabrera he would of commanded a huge salary (as seen through what he receives as a Tiger) and maybe this means we would not have had the funds to lock up Hanley or JJ...

Nah, Miggie was gone. Right now we'd be going into this season with maybe a couple draft picks to show for him and that's it. He'd probably be in New York or Boston right now.

#19 User is offline   Piazza31 

  • I'm not inspired by the Media. I Inspire it.
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,280
  • Joined: August 20, 2006
  • Location:Miami, FL
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 13, 2010 - 09:20 PM

View PostPuma, on March 12, 2010 - 09:58 PM, said:

View PostPiazza31, on March 12, 2010 - 03:38 PM, said:

He was, and still is in my mind a Fat Sack of "Maurice Clarrett".


What does that even mean?

Anyway...when you have a career .311 batting average and average 33 home runs a season, your weight is irrelevant.


That means I didn't like his fat ass or his attitude. Or the fact that he wouldn't lose weight for the Marlins, but once traded started to shed the weight.

He didn't care about playing. He cared about getting the biggest paycheck possible.

F*** him, Fatty.

Maurice Clarrett is also a fecal matter for a human being.

#20 User is offline   Rabbethan 

  • Member of Captain Mitre's Pirate Crew
  • Group: VIP
  • Posts: 12,771
  • Joined: May 22, 2007
  • Location:Miami/Doral, Fl
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 14, 2010 - 02:11 PM

View PostPiazza31, on March 13, 2010 - 09:20 PM, said:

View PostPuma, on March 12, 2010 - 09:58 PM, said:

View PostPiazza31, on March 12, 2010 - 03:38 PM, said:

He was, and still is in my mind a Fat Sack of "Maurice Clarrett".


What does that even mean?

Anyway...when you have a career .311 batting average and average 33 home runs a season, your weight is irrelevant.


That means I didn't like his fat ass or his attitude. Or the fact that he wouldn't lose weight for the Marlins, but once traded started to shed the weight.

He didn't care about playing. He cared about getting the biggest paycheck possible.

F*** him, Fatty.

Maurice Clarrett is also a fecal matter for a human being.


For the record, all that weight he lost after he was traded he gained back before ST was over.

#21 User is offline   el penguino 

  • All Star
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14,112
  • Joined: November 1, 2003
  • Location:Charm City
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 14, 2010 - 02:26 PM

Was that before or after Detroit gave him his big pay day?

#22 User is offline   Rabbethan 

  • Member of Captain Mitre's Pirate Crew
  • Group: VIP
  • Posts: 12,771
  • Joined: May 22, 2007
  • Location:Miami/Doral, Fl
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 14, 2010 - 06:56 PM

View Postel penguino, on March 14, 2010 - 02:26 PM, said:

Was that before or after Detroit gave him his big pay day?

About the same time.

#23 User is offline   Erick 

  • Erick
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9,148
  • Joined: March 23, 2008
  • Location:Miami Lakes, FL.
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 14, 2010 - 07:50 PM

Even if he was fat...he was still a tremendous hitter. He could've continued eating all the twinkies he wanted/wants as long as he produces the way he has, imo.

#24 User is offline   MrMarlinPride 

  • The Baron has Returned.
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,407
  • Joined: July 8, 2008
  • Location:Weston, Florida
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 14, 2010 - 07:55 PM

View PostErick, on March 14, 2010 - 07:50 PM, said:

Even if he was fat...he was still a tremendous hitter. He could've continued eating all the twinkies he wanted/wants as long as he produces the way he has, imo.


This.


#25 User is offline   Puma 

  • Rookie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,661
  • Joined: October 14, 2007
  • Location:West Palm Beach, FL
  • Gender:Male

Posted March 14, 2010 - 09:00 PM

View PostErick, on March 14, 2010 - 07:50 PM, said:

Even if he was fat...he was still a tremendous hitter. He could've continued eating all the twinkies he wanted/wants as long as he produces the way he has, imo.


Thank you.

Share this topic:


  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users