What's new

Sheffield: Latin Players Easier To Control Than Blacks

Passion

Muckdog
Joined
May 6, 2004
Messages
21,939
Reaction score
0
The percentage of African-Americans playing Major League Baseball is at an all-time low and Gary Sheffield says he has a theory why that's the case.

In an interview with GQ magazine that's currently on newsstands, the typically outspoken Tigers designated hitter said Latin players have replaced African-Americans as baseball's most prevalent minority because they are easier to control.

"I called it years ago. What I called is that you're going to see more black faces, but there ain't no English going to be coming out. ? [It's about] being able to tell [Latin players] what to do -- being able to control them," he told the magazine.

"Where I'm from, you can't control us. You might get a guy to do it that way for a while because he wants to benefit, but in the end, he is going to go back to being who he is. And that's a person that you're going to talk to with respect, you're going to talk to like a man.

"These are the things my race demands. So, if you're equally good as this Latin player, guess who's going to get sent home? I know a lot of players that are home now can outplay a lot of these guys."

According to a 2005 report by the University of Central Florida Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sport, only 8.5 percent of major leaguers were African American -- the lowest percentage since the report was initiated in the mid-1980s. By contrast, whites comprised 59.5 percent of the majors' player pool, Latinos 28.7 percent and Asians 2.5.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2891875

A big :psign to those quotes.
 

furcalchick

Muckdog
Joined
Dec 21, 2006
Messages
2,061
Reaction score
0
and you wonder why you never last too long on any team, huh sheff?

he's a t.o. lite, he's happy for two years, and then he causes chaos in the clubhouse and demands to be traded.
 

Nny

Muckdog
Joined
May 3, 2007
Messages
4,326
Reaction score
0
He used to be my favorite player when I was too young to actually know better. |:

I also seriously laughed out loud when he said it was a "conspiracy" if his suspension was kept.
 

LordMagnus

Muckdog
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
7,180
Reaction score
0
Too many steroids having negative effects on the brain is now confirmed.
 

bobbob1313

Muckdog
Joined
May 2, 2006
Messages
7,820
Reaction score
0
"I called it years ago. What I called is that you're going to see more black faces, but there ain't no English going to be coming out."

Obviously.
 

The_Godfather

Muckdog
Joined
Sep 8, 2004
Messages
4,727
Reaction score
0
What a stupid thing to say. Damn, and Sheffield is one of my favorite people in baseball. :confused
 

Festa

Guest
400 years of slavery will do that to a race.

Those latinos don't know what they're getting themselves into.

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 

TSwift25

Muckdog
Joined
Dec 2, 2003
Messages
13,534
Reaction score
0
I think his point is somewhat true, but it's what he says that kills his argument.

The reason that there are more latino players in baseball than African Americans has a lot to do with nurturing the game in the child's youth. By and large, little league is dominated by white boys (and girls), as the major league numbers show.

However, when little league turns competitive and travel and all-star teams are formed, hispanic players are generally recruited by the coaches in lieu of African Americans. Why? Well, the most prevalent theory I've heard is that African American children are being turned onto football and basketball as their "make it your focus" sports. There are myriad reasons for this, many of which have been discussed here, but the essence of this is if a travel team coach goes to a hispanic child/family and asks them to play on his team it's an "OK" rather than the "no thanks" generally received from African Americans or even whites because of higher priority committments.

Now, does it have to do with "controling" them, no.

Simply, the language issues are what make this a talking point (since, if I don't speak your language, me mouthing off doesn't hold much weight), but it's the value structure by the different cultures that has led to such a stark divide.
 

isd71

Muckdog
Joined
Jun 7, 2004
Messages
269
Reaction score
0
I think his point is somewhat true, but it's what he says that kills his argument.

The reason that there are more latino players in baseball than African Americans has a lot to do with nurturing the game in the child's youth. By and large, little league is dominated by white boys (and girls), as the major league numbers show.

However, when little league turns competitive and travel and all-star teams are formed, hispanic players are generally recruited by the coaches in lieu of African Americans. Why? Well, the most prevalent theory I've heard is that African American children are being turned onto football and basketball as their "make it your focus" sports. There are myriad reasons for this, many of which have been discussed here, but the essence of this is if a travel team coach goes to a hispanic child/family and asks them to play on his team it's an "OK" rather than the "no thanks" generally received from African Americans or even whites because of higher priority committments.

Now, does it have to do with "controling" them, no.

Simply, the language issues are what make this a talking point (since, if I don't speak your language, me mouthing off doesn't hold much weight), but it's the value structure by the different cultures that has led to such a stark divide.

Well the main reason that football and basketball has become the African American child's focus sport is that in college you can get a full ride for those sports, however in base full rides are hardly ever handed out and you won't get one on a good team if you do get one at all. So, if you can't afford college and want to go the sport route of getting in baseball is definitely not the sport for you. I went to almost every college baseball home game at Alabama and even the traditional black schools such as Mississippi Valley State, which is in the SWAC, had a primarily white team.
 

TSwift25

Muckdog
Joined
Dec 2, 2003
Messages
13,534
Reaction score
0
I think his point is somewhat true, but it's what he says that kills his argument.

The reason that there are more latino players in baseball than African Americans has a lot to do with nurturing the game in the child's youth. By and large, little league is dominated by white boys (and girls), as the major league numbers show.

However, when little league turns competitive and travel and all-star teams are formed, hispanic players are generally recruited by the coaches in lieu of African Americans. Why? Well, the most prevalent theory I've heard is that African American children are being turned onto football and basketball as their "make it your focus" sports. There are myriad reasons for this, many of which have been discussed here, but the essence of this is if a travel team coach goes to a hispanic child/family and asks them to play on his team it's an "OK" rather than the "no thanks" generally received from African Americans or even whites because of higher priority committments.

Now, does it have to do with "controling" them, no.

Simply, the language issues are what make this a talking point (since, if I don't speak your language, me mouthing off doesn't hold much weight), but it's the value structure by the different cultures that has led to such a stark divide.

Well the main reason that football and basketball has become the African American child's focus sport is that in college you can get a full ride for those sports, however in base full rides are hardly ever handed out and you won't get one on a good team if you do get one at all. So, if you can't afford college and want to go the sport route of getting in baseball is definitely not the sport for you. I went to almost every college baseball home game at Alabama and even the traditional black schools such as Mississippi Valley State, which is in the SWAC, had a primarily white team.

That's not true. You can get a full ride for baseball, to big schools, D1 schools.

What the problem is is that baseball cannot be played as a pickup inner city sport. It has, for better or worse, forced its way onto grass, so by extension, into the suburbs. It's impossible to organize as a 2-2 or 3-3 sport. It takes specialized equipment well above just sneakers and a ball to play.
 

Hotcorner

Muckdog
Moderator
Joined
Aug 22, 2002
Messages
21,691
Reaction score
11
God I love athletes. :thumbup

"I called it years ago. What I called is that you're going to see more black faces, but there ain't no English going to be coming out."

Obviously.

:lol
 

FlummoxedLummox

Guest
I think his point is somewhat true, but it's what he says that kills his argument.

The reason that there are more latino players in baseball than African Americans has a lot to do with nurturing the game in the child's youth. By and large, little league is dominated by white boys (and girls), as the major league numbers show.

However, when little league turns competitive and travel and all-star teams are formed, hispanic players are generally recruited by the coaches in lieu of African Americans. Why? Well, the most prevalent theory I've heard is that African American children are being turned onto football and basketball as their "make it your focus" sports. There are myriad reasons for this, many of which have been discussed here, but the essence of this is if a travel team coach goes to a hispanic child/family and asks them to play on his team it's an "OK" rather than the "no thanks" generally received from African Americans or even whites because of higher priority committments.

Now, does it have to do with "controling" them, no.

Simply, the language issues are what make this a talking point (since, if I don't speak your language, me mouthing off doesn't hold much weight), but it's the value structure by the different cultures that has led to such a stark divide.
Swift, you're not agreeing with what he says at all. You each offer completely different reasons for the demographic change. From my understanding of your post, the only thing you two agree on is that a demographic divide in fact exists. You offer a cultural explanation, where hispanic children grow up with a greater appreciation for the game, while African American children have different priorities. Sheffield offers a purely racist explanation, saying African Americans are better ballplayers who are culturally superior because they can't be controlled, and are thus overlooked in favor of the more malleable hispanic players. Why even put yourself in Sheffield's corner?
 

Beastie

Muckdog
Joined
Oct 31, 2003
Messages
911
Reaction score
0
I think his point is somewhat true, but it's what he says that kills his argument.

The reason that there are more latino players in baseball than African Americans has a lot to do with nurturing the game in the child's youth. By and large, little league is dominated by white boys (and girls), as the major league numbers show.

However, when little league turns competitive and travel and all-star teams are formed, hispanic players are generally recruited by the coaches in lieu of African Americans. Why? Well, the most prevalent theory I've heard is that African American children are being turned onto football and basketball as their "make it your focus" sports. There are myriad reasons for this, many of which have been discussed here, but the essence of this is if a travel team coach goes to a hispanic child/family and asks them to play on his team it's an "OK" rather than the "no thanks" generally received from African Americans or even whites because of higher priority committments.

Now, does it have to do with "controling" them, no.

Simply, the language issues are what make this a talking point (since, if I don't speak your language, me mouthing off doesn't hold much weight), but it's the value structure by the different cultures that has led to such a stark divide.

Well the main reason that football and basketball has become the African American child's focus sport is that in college you can get a full ride for those sports, however in base full rides are hardly ever handed out and you won't get one on a good team if you do get one at all. So, if you can't afford college and want to go the sport route of getting in baseball is definitely not the sport for you. I went to almost every college baseball home game at Alabama and even the traditional black schools such as Mississippi Valley State, which is in the SWAC, had a primarily white team.

That's not true. You can get a full ride for baseball, to big schools, D1 schools.

What the problem is is that baseball cannot be played as a pickup inner city sport. It has, for better or worse, forced its way onto grass, so by extension, into the suburbs. It's impossible to organize as a 2-2 or 3-3 sport. It takes specialized equipment well above just sneakers and a ball to play.

Full rides do not come very often in NCAA baseball. Only way someone gets a full ride to college is either a. They have great grades or b. They are Alex Rodriguez type baseball players.

Baseball doesnt gain as much profit as Football or Basketball.
 

Top Bottom