Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Author

I understood that if the Heat played the Suns or the Spurs that both would have Home Court advantage.

780462[/snapback]

 

 

How so against the Suns?

I understood that if the Heat played the Suns or the Spurs that both would have Home Court advantage.

780462[/snapback]

 

 

How so against the Suns?

780469[/snapback]

 

Suns have the best record.

Its been my impression that the Spurs would have it, but that conference record thingy sounds as solid as any other tiebreaker, so who knows...

 

If it goes to strength of schedule, though, obviously that'd be the Spurs...

I understood that if the Heat played the Suns or the Spurs that both would have Home Court advantage.

780462[/snapback]

 

 

How so against the Suns?

780469[/snapback]

What I meant by both, is that both the Spurs and Suns would have home court advantage over the Heat.

I understood that if the Heat played the Suns or the Spurs that both would have Home Court advantage.

780462[/snapback]

 

 

How so against the Suns?

780469[/snapback]

What I meant by both, is that both the Spurs and Suns would have home court advantage over the Heat.

780480[/snapback]

 

I'm not sure about the Spurs, but definitely the Suns have home court.

Two-Team Tiebreakers are the following:

 

1. Better record in head-to-head games

2. Higher winning percentage in conference games

3. Higher winning percentage within division (if teams are in the same division)

4. Higher winning percentage against playoff teams in own conference

5. Higher winning percentage against playoff teams in opposite conference

6. Higher point differential between points scored and points allowed.

 

We should have home court, as we went 1-1 against them, and our conference record (41-11) is better than the Spurs (36-16). So, go Spurs?

Two-Team Tiebreakers are the following:

 

1. Better record in head-to-head games

2. Higher winning percentage in conference games

3. Higher winning percentage within division (if teams are in the same division)

4. Higher winning percentage against playoff teams in own conference

5. Higher winning percentage against playoff teams in opposite conference

6. Higher point differential between points scored and points allowed.

 

We should have home court, as we went 1-1 against them, and our conference record (41-11) is better than the Spurs (36-16). So, go Spurs?

780598[/snapback]

 

That's the tiebreak for playoff seeding, I think, but this isn't a seeding situation.

 

I have read around the internet that the tiebreak in this case is the record against the other conference, which certainly makes more sense. On the other hand, reading what morons post on the internet isn't always the best way to come by information, so I can't say for sure.

san antonio has home court against all teams not named phoenix

Ok, now tell me why

san antonio has home court against all teams not named phoenix

Ok, now tell me why

788829[/snapback]

 

 

 

well since you dont know nba rules.....

 

 

in the nba finals for the tiebreak

 

 

tiebreak one is head to head. they split.

 

 

tiebreak two is record against other conference.

 

miami was 18-12

san antonio was 23-7

 

 

someone pointed that out in this thread. now run along and learn the rules. would you like to go into something offbeat about basketball itself to further learn this sport?

Oh, I'm sorry. I apologize for knowing the tiebreaker rules for playoff seeding and not for the NBA Finals. The NBA apparently decided they were going to seed one way, and then essentially reseed another way. That's cute, but gay.

 

Why don't you go run along and learn to post something concrete behind a fact, instead of this is how it is and no reason why. But that isn't possible for you now is it :thumbup

san antonio has home court against all teams not named phoenix

Ok, now tell me why

788829[/snapback]

 

 

 

well since you dont know nba rules.....

 

 

in the nba finals for the tiebreak

 

 

tiebreak one is head to head. they split.

 

 

tiebreak two is record against other conference.

 

miami was 18-12

san antonio was 23-7

 

 

someone pointed that out in this thread. now run along and learn the rules. would you like to go into something offbeat about basketball itself to further learn this sport?

789141[/snapback]

 

Wow....Do you feel powerful now? Do you feel like a big man?

As far as I know, this is the simple equation.

 

 

Edit: Ignore again, It's record against opposite conference. Thus Spurs have Home-Court

As far as I know, this is the simple equation.

 

 

Spurs Record > Heat Record = Spurs have home-court

789527[/snapback]

They had the same regular season record

Oh, I'm sorry. I apologize for knowing the tiebreaker rules for playoff seeding and not for the NBA Finals. The NBA apparently decided they were going to seed one way, and then essentially reseed another way. That's cute, but gay.

 

Why don't you go run along and learn to post something concrete behind a fact, instead of this is how it is and no reason why. But that isn't possible for you now is it :thumbup

789343[/snapback]

 

 

 

there is no seeding in the nba finals.

 

 

 

they go 2-3-2 in the finals also

To take the homecourt advantage of the NBA finals, do they not follow a separate formula if the teams have a tie record and split head to head? Apparently, they do. So, they reseed.

To take the homecourt advantage of the NBA finals, do they not follow a separate formula if the teams have a tie record and split head to head? Apparently, they do. So, they reseed.

789623[/snapback]

 

 

 

sure if you want to call it reseeding then i guess.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...
Background Picker
Customize Layout