DNA Toppling Evolution

[Bradcore]

Due to the huge size of this article, I'm only going to post a snippet and you can click the link if you feel like reading the rest.

 

Up to now, Darwinian evolutionists could try to counter their detractors with some possible explanations for the complexity of life. But now they have to face the information dilemma: How can meaningful, precise information be created by accident?by mutation and natural selection? None of these contain the mechanism of intelligence, a requirement for creating complex information such as that found in the genetic code.

 

Darwinian evolution is still taught in most schools as though it were fact. But it is increasingly being found wanting by a growing number of scientists. "As recently as twenty-five years ago," says former atheist Patrick Glynn, "a reasonable person weighing the purely scientific evidence on the issue would likely have come down on the side of skepticism [regarding a Creator]. That is no longer the case." He adds: "Today the concrete data point strongly in the direction of the God hypothesis. It is the simplest and most obvious solution . . ." (God: The Evidence, 1997, pp. 54-55, 53).

 

Source

[Shamrock]

Would be neat except the magazine is Christian and they have been using pretty dumb arguments against science for a long time now. I feel bad for people that are dooped into believing that the Bible lays out creation word for word. Sad, really. Enlightenment what?

[Flying_Mollusk]

Where does evolution state a creator cannot exist? Where does it say it is impossible for evolution to be the idea of God? Nowhere. But it does deny literal interpretation by a bunch of wackos.

 

Why cant religious people accept that evolution is likely God's choice on a matter of their own personal faith ? Because the frikkin Bible says words, they must deny all science.

[legacyofCangelosi]

Where does evolution state a creator cannot exist? Where does it say it is impossible for evolution to be the idea of God? Nowhere. But it does deny literal interpretation by a bunch of wackos.

 

Why cant religious people accept that evolution is likely God's choice on a matter of their own personal faith ? Because the frikkin Bible says words, they must deny all science.

784466[/snapback]

 

This has always been my argument. The bible was written by men, true or not in its teachings, it doesnt have to be in its storylines. The bible does not confirm nor deny evolution. It doesnt mention it. I believe in God, and I believe evolution is a process he created, and why not

[Shamrock]

Sounds fine to me. That distinguishes you from the fundamentalists.