Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Most people seem to think the idea of rival companies working together for each other's benefit is absurd but Price Fixing is a real problem in various industries.

 

WASHINGTON (AP) ? Samsung, the world's largest maker of memory chips for computers and other electronic gadgets, has agreed to plead guilty to price fixing and pay a $300 million fine, U.S. officials said Thursday.

The penalty is the second-largest criminal antitrust fine ever and caps a three-year investigation into the largest makers of dynamic random access memory computer chips, a $7.7 billion market in the United States.

 

The guilty plea to the single felony charge by South Korea-based Samsung Electronics and its U.S. subsidiary, Samsung Semiconductor, was to be entered Thursday in U.S. District Court in San Francisco.

 

The government's acting antitrust chief, Thomas O. Barnett, said seven Samsung employees were not protected by the guilty plea, an indication they may individually face criminal antitrust charges.

 

"That's a decision for us to make moving forward," Barnett said. He added that prosecuting individuals ? not just companies ? in price-fixing cases is an important deterrent against similar abuses.

 

The Justice Department already has secured similar guilty pleas from two other companies and collected more than $345 million in fines.

 

"Price-fixing threatens our free market system, stifles innovation and robs American consumers of the benefit of competitive prices," Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said.

 

Samsung said in a statement the company "strongly supports fair competition and ethical practices and forbids anti-competitive behavior." A spokeswoman, Chris Goodhart, declined to identify the seven employees or say whether they still worked for Samsung.

 

Samsung received grand jury subpoenas in connection with the investigation during 2002, and put aside $100 million late last year to pay potential criminal penalties.

 

Samsung's top competitor, Seoul-based Hynix, agreed earlier this year to plead guilty to price fixing and pay a $185 million fine. Last September, rival Infineon Technologies of Germany agreed to a $160 million fine. Another competitor, Micron Technology of Boise, has been cooperating with prosecutors and was not expected to face charges.

 

The government accused the companies of conspiring in e-mails, telephone calls and face-to-face meetings to fix prices of memory chips between April 1999 and June 2002. The chips are used in digital recorders, personal computers, printers, video recorders, mobile phones and many other electronics.

 

The government said the victims of the alleged price-fixing were Dell, Compaq Computer, Hewlett-Packard, Apple Computer, IBM and Gateway.

 

Barrett said Apple and Dell raised computer prices to compensate, and other companies responded by reducing the amount of memory installed in computers they sold but kept consumer prices the same.

 

The investigation started in 2002, a year after memory chip prices began to climb even though the high-tech industry was in a tailspin. At the time, the hikes were attributed to tight supplies, although then-Dell Computer CEO Michael Dell blamed them on cartel-like behavior by chipmakers

Gas companies are the most guilty parties. Price-gauging is bush-league.

Gas companies are the most guilty parties. Price-gauging is bush-league.

 

Demand goes this way ^ = Prices go this way ^

The penalty is the second-largest criminal antitrust fine ever

 

What is the largest?

The penalty is the second-largest criminal antitrust fine ever

 

What is the largest?

Microsoft Windows/Internet Exploder thing is my guess.

I think it had to deal with Vitamin makers...

Gas companies are the most guilty parties. Price-gauging is bush-league.

 

Demand goes this way ^ = Prices go this way ^

Only if demand is truely what is causing the proportional price increase.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...