MarlinatPenn Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 'SuperSite' plan put on hold By Jeff Darlington Palm Beach Post Staff Writer Monday, December 12, 2005 SAN DIEGO ? The Dolphins' long-range plans to enhance the area around Dolphins Stadium with hotels, restaurants and retail shops have been put on hold, Dolphins CEO Joe Bailey said Sunday. Instead, the organization will focus on improving the stadium itself.  Team owner Wayne Huizenga had discussed making the stadium area a "SuperSite," but that plan depended on the NFL agreeing to make the stadium part of a guaranteed Super Bowl rotation. Huizenga envisioned the Super Bowl being played there every four years.  The Super Bowl already is scheduled to be played at Dolphins Stadium in 2007 and 2010, but the NFL has not acted on the request for a set rotation. "The fact of the matter is, the SuperSite ? the concept, at least ? has been shelved for the time being," Bailey said. "The reason why it has been put on the back burner is because in order for us to be able to do it from an economic standpoint, we have to get a permanent rotation of Super Bowls. "That was the only way we could justify it from a business perspective." The plans to enhance the stadiums include the addition of two large, high-definition scoreboards. "We're really focused on making that stadium a fabulous place," Bailey said. "These are enhancements that we think will create the stadium into what it should be and can be ? and that is a world-class, entertainment sports venue." Other improvements to the stadium will include widening the concourses. Huizenga has been talking to the Marlins about possibly providing land for a baseball-only stadium adjacent to Dolphins Stadium. The offer has been reported to be for 15 acres. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PBCMarlinsFan Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 This is definitely not good news as far as negotiating with the Marlins for a new stadium is concerned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lefty Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 This is definitely not good news as far as negotiating with the Marlins for a new stadium is concerned. The Marlins are the reason the 'SuperSite' is on hold. Huizenga really wants them to stay, and he won't make it unless they do stay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PBMarlin Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 It's probably a negotiating tactic from Wayne, i.e. down-playing the need for the Marlins to play there 81 dates per year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hotcorner Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 It seems like an awful stretch that the NFL would actually grant Wayne a Super Bowl every 4 years just so he could base his SuperSite plan around it. Other NFL cities would throw an absolute fit. Even if Miami did get the game an average of once every 4 or 5 years, they're sure as hell not going to sign an agreement guaranteeing it. Maybe he's focusing on upgrades to Dolphins Stadium to enhance his chances of getting the SuperBowl agreement, but I think he's dreaming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_eob Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 I dont think this is so bad, if the NFL cant guarantee a rotation of superbowls then they will need the Marlins for the same econimic reasons they mention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prinmemito Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 It's probably a negotiating tactic from Wayne, i.e. down-playing the need for the Marlins to play there 81 dates per year.  Exactly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PBCMarlinsFan Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 This is definitely not good news as far as negotiating with the Marlins for a new stadium is concerned. The Marlins are the reason the 'SuperSite' is on hold. Huizenga really wants them to stay, and he won't make it unless they do stay. Obviously. And he is evidently scrapping the idea for the time being and focusing on improving DS. Which indicates there may have been an impasse in the negotiations with the Marlins. Unless this is just some ploy by Huizenga to gain a better bargaining position, as some have suggested. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSwift25 Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 This is just posturing on Wayne's part. As PBMarlin said, this is probably (at least in a round about sort of way) good for the Marlins as it will probably speed up the negotiating process for the new stadium on Wayne's land. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rferry Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 Huh? Any strengthening of Huizenga's resolve is not good for the Marlins in negotiations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSwift25 Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 Huh? Any strengthening of Huizenga's resolve is not good for the Marlins in negotiations.  Wayne's wanted this Wayne's World structure for far too long for him to simply walk away from it. Wayne saying that he's "putting it on hold" is like the Marlins saying they want to relocate; both moves were simply done to expedite the negotiating process. Not to say they're empty threats, but they're clearly being used with the intention of bringing about action elsewhere. The Marlins want a commitment from Florida, Wayne wants a commitment from the Marlins...hence the posturing on the part of both parties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prinmemito Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 This reduces the Marlins leverage, meaning they might have to agree to a bad lease to get this deal done. If that is the case, the Marlins walk. And that might be the end of it. Marlins end up moving. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsMania Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 If the Marlins are there 81 dates, then they dont have to get the superbowl every 4 years, to produce revenue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marlins2003 Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 I could be completely wrong (watching hundreds standing in unison screaming "Yes!!!!!") but I suspect it has little if anything to do with the Marlins and more to do with the inability to come to terms with the NFL over guaranteeing a Super Bowl every four years. Â So big is the Super Bowl, and so big are the revenues and cash flow, that it in itself almost financially demands the construction Wayne's World. The Marlins are just the frosting on the cake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreshFish Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 I could be completely wrong (watching hundreds standing in unison screaming "Yes!!!!!") but I suspect it has little if anything to do with the Marlins and more to do with the inability to come to terms with the NFL over guaranteeing a Super Bowl every four years.  So big is the Super Bowl, and so big are the revenues and cash flow, that it in itself almost financially demands the construction Wayne's World. The Marlins are just the frosting on the cake.    I disagree, Wayne is looking for a gurantee spot in the rotation. So let's say he gets his way and they give SouthFlorida the Super Bowl once every 4 year. I don't think the Fish are just the frosting on the Cake, they are a bigger Fish than the Dolphins and the SB in this scenario Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prinmemito Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 I could be completely wrong (watching hundreds standing in unison screaming "Yes!!!!!") but I suspect it has little if anything to do with the Marlins and more to do with the inability to come to terms with the NFL over guaranteeing a Super Bowl every four years.  So big is the Super Bowl, and so big are the revenues and cash flow, that it in itself almost financially demands the construction Wayne's World. The Marlins are just the frosting on the cake.  Could be true. But Wayne doesn't seem to have any leverage at all in negotiations with the NFL. Saying the SuperSite is on hold doesn't do anything for Wayne in his quest for getting a guaranteed Super Bowl every four years. So, in effect, what you're saying is that if the NFL doesn't approve this plan then Wayne really doesn't stand to gain much from having the Marlins around? Or am I misunderstanding you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marlins2003 Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 I could be completely wrong (watching hundreds standing in unison screaming "Yes!!!!!") but I suspect it has little if anything to do with the Marlins and more to do with the inability to come to terms with the NFL over guaranteeing a Super Bowl every four years.  So big is the Super Bowl, and so big are the revenues and cash flow, that it in itself almost financially demands the construction Wayne's World. The Marlins are just the frosting on the cake.    "I disagree..." Only 99 more to go, everyone get in line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSwift25 Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 I could be completely wrong (watching hundreds standing in unison screaming "Yes!!!!!") but I suspect it has little if anything to do with the Marlins and more to do with the inability to come to terms with the NFL over guaranteeing a Super Bowl every four years.  So big is the Super Bowl, and so big are the revenues and cash flow, that it in itself almost financially demands the construction Wayne's World. The Marlins are just the frosting on the cake.  I understand completely what you're saying regarding revenue from football/the Superbowl, but 81 home games, and guaranteeing that there is a tenant on Wayne's property for every month except for February and March is more than just icing. If anything, the Super Bowl once every four years is the icing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PBMarlin Posted December 13, 2005 Share Posted December 13, 2005 Well, let's see. 25K fans for 81 events per year for 4 years vs. 1 SuperBowl event. That's 8.1 million fans vs. 80,000 fans. While I agree a SuperBowl is likely to incite quite a bit more spending in Wayne's World than than a baseball game, would it really have fans spending 100 times as much on average? Doubtful. Plus consider it's the baseball draw 6 months per year that is more likely to to give Wayne's World the inertia to make it a popular year-round destination. And let's face it, that's what is necessary to make it a success. Wayne clearly needs the Marlins on-site to make it work.  The Marlin's best approach would be to recognize this (as I'm sure they do) and work in good faith to forge an arrangement where everyone benefits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rferry Posted December 13, 2005 Share Posted December 13, 2005 I'm not sure Huizenga realizes the Marlins know it. And I'm pretty sure Huizenga won't react well to having the tables turned on him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marlins2003 Posted December 13, 2005 Share Posted December 13, 2005 I don't think people got the jist of what I was saying - which wasn't that the Marlins aren't a component - but rather for WH NFL owner, and HH as a business, getting the Super Bowl every four years is the holy grail of sports. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hotcorner Posted December 13, 2005 Share Posted December 13, 2005 I'm not sure how much help realistically the baseball fans will be for the SuperSite. Weekend games could do well, but during weekdays I would think most people head to the game right after work, get to the park just in time, & aren't going to be sticking around at 11:00 after the game's over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSwift25 Posted December 13, 2005 Share Posted December 13, 2005 Not to say this is an airtight market study, but I can't tell you how many people I know in Palm Beach that go to games that said they would go more frequently if there was something to do around the stadium instead of an hour drive down and an hour drive back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristud Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 i look at it like this: wayne put's the super site on hold for now.he joins forces with the marlins and dade county to help build the marlins new ballpark.then construction begins and the necessary funds are available in case of overruns. :hat then he resumes with his plans for the supersite.he can show the banks and sponsors that the combination of 81 baseball games couples with 8 dolphin games not including playoffs,will show how many sports fans will be traveling through the area and will need his hotels and resturaunts. he will be able to borrow more mony from the banks and more sponsors will want in. that must be whya he's offering the land and the $50 million. why else would the supersite be on hold and his offer remains on the table? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLRyan23 Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 if anything happens on the stadium front, I believe it's going to be involving Wayne. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.