Jump to content

Obama's List Up to 33 Czars


WildMarlinMan2003
 Share

Recommended Posts

Tsar or czar[1] (Bulgarian цар, Russian: царь (help·info), Ukrainian: цар, in Serbian: цар / car, in scientific transliteration respectively car' and car), occasionally spelled csar or tzar in English, is a Slavic term designating certain monarchs.

 

Originally, the title Czar (derived from Caesar) meant Emperor in the European medieval sense of the term, that is, a ruler who claims the same rank as a Roman emperor, with the approval of another emperor or a supreme ecclesiastical official (the Pope or the Ecumenical Patriarch).

 

Occasionally, the word could be used to designate other, non-Christian, supreme rulers. In Russia and Bulgaria the imperial connotations of the term were blurred with time and, by the 19th century, it had come to be viewed as an equivalent of King.[2][3]

 

"Tsar" was the official title of the supreme ruler in the following states:

 

Bulgaria in 913–1018, in 1185–1422 and in 1908–1946

Serbia in 1346–1371

Russia from about 1547 until 1721 (replaced in 1721 by imperator, but remained in common usage until 1917).

 

Like many lofty titles, e.g. Mogul, Tsar or Czar has been used as a metaphor for positions of high authority, in English since 1866 (referring to U.S. President Andrew Johnson), with a connotation of dictatorial powers and style, fitting since "Autocrat" was an official title of the Russian Emperor (informally referred to as 'the Tsar'). Similarly, Speaker of the House Thomas Brackett Reed was called "Czar Reed" for his dictatorial control of the House of Representatives in the 1880s and 1890s.

 

In the United States the title "czar" is an informal term for certain high-level officials, such as the "drug czar" for the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration, "terrorism czar" for a Presidential advisor on terrorism policy, "cybersecurity czar" for the highest-ranking Department of Homeland Security official on computer security and information security policy, and "war czar" to oversee the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

 

from the Boston Herald:

Do you know how many czars have been appointed by the Obama administration? 33

Congressional Democrats want another one to bring the grand total to 34. This new czar would oversee health insurance.

According to the AP the responsibilities for this new czar would include “determining who qualifies for federal subsidies to help buy coverage, setting standards for handling grievances and appeals for claims denied, determining plan benefits for each year, policing insurance marketing campaigns, and enforcing a requirement that the insurers spend on medical care at least 85% of what they collect in premiums.�

 

 

 

Here is a list of Obama’s current and prospective Czar positions:

 

1. Technology Czar: Aneesh Chopra.

2. Drug Czar: Gil Kerlikowske.

3. Copyright Czar: Not appointed yet.

4. Energy Czar: Carol M. Browner.

5. Car Czar: Ed Montgomery.

6. Terrorism/WMD Czar: Gary Samore.

7. Health Care Czar: Nancy-Ann DeParle.

8. Education Czar: Not appointed yet.

9. Economic Czar: Paul Volcker.

10. Mortgage Czar: Not appointed yet.

11. Urban Affairs/Housing Czar: Adolfo Carrion.

12. Guantanomo closure Czar: Danny Fried.

13. Great lakes Czar: Cameron Davis.

14. Stimulus accountability Czar: Earl Devaney.

15. Cyberspace Czar: Not appointed yet.

16. Border Czar: Alan Bersin (Former US attorney).

17. Intelligence Czar: Admiral Dennis Blair.

18. Regulatory Czar: Cass Sunstein.

19. Pay Czar: Kenneth Feinberg.

20. Iran Czar: Not appointed yet.

21. Tarp Czar: Herb Allison.

22. Middle-East peace Czar: George Mitchell.

23. Science Czar: John Holdren.

24. Green jobs Czar: Van Jones.

25. Afghanistan Czar: Richard Holbrooke.

26. Sudan Czar: J. Scott Gration.

27. Mideast policy Czar: Dennis Ross.

28. Information Czar: Vivek Kundra.

29. AIDS Czar: Jeffrey Crowley.

30. Faith-based Czar: Joshua Dubois.

31. Climate Czar: Todd Stern .

 

 

With all the Czars that Mr. Obama has placed in his adminstration is similar to what the old USSR did. There are 3 definitions of a czar the first one is a an emperor or king; the former emperor of Russia; an autocratic ruler or leader; and the final one any person exercising great authority or power in a particular field. The thing that doesn't make sense is if he wants a open government like he said during the campaign why does he need czars? Did our founding fathers want people to have czars in Washington? No they didn't they wanted a system of checks and balances not people who weren't accountable. This is another sign of Obama trying to get rid of freedom and liberty.

 

We have lost our system of checks and balances as Obama's approval rating dropped to another all time low July 8th.

 

If this doesn't make some of you people sick then we're hopeless. Education czar? We already have a Secretary of Education!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Oh ya, these czars make $179,000 per year and have a staff of 10 people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! per the AP

 

This is the worst government control we have seen since Hitler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


HERE IS A LIST of Obama’s leading ‘czars,’ (all Zionist Jews save one), and their Zionist agenda to install a Zionist inspired socialist system in America’s government:

 

Economic Czar - Admin Summers. Director of Obama’s National Economic Council. A Zionist Jew, Summers served as President of Harvard University from 2001 to 2006.

 

In a recent article: Is Admin Summers Taking Kickbacks From the Banks He’s Bailing Out, Summers is exposed as acting in his own interests and not America’s in his role as Obama’s economic ‘czar.’ On June 12, 2009, Summers addressed the Zionist-led Council on Foreign Relations, defending his policies against the accusation of “backdoor socialism�.

 

Regulatory Czar - Cass Sunstein. Director of Obama’s Office of Regulatory Affairs. A Zionist Jew, Sunstein joined the faculty of the Zionist-run Harvard Law School and began serving as the director of its Program on Risk Regulation.

 

A leading architect of the Cyber Security Act of 2009, now before Congress, Sunstein stated that the Internet is a “threat to democracy�. Indeed, our last bastion of freedom, the Internet, may soon be under the dictatorial control of this Zionist Jew, Sunstein.

 

Pay Czar - Kenneth Feinberg. Appointed by Obama to “regulate the pay for over 175 US corporate executives�. Feinberg, a Zionist Jew and Washington lawyer, worked for President Bush to prevent lawsuits against the US by the families of victims of the alleged 9-11 terrorist attacks, thus assisting in the Zionist cover-up of 9-11’s “inside job�.

 

Guantanamo/Military Jails Czar - Daniel Fried. Appointed by Obama to plead “individual war on terror detainee cases� while ostensibly working to close Guantanamo Bay’s US torture & detention camp.

 

A Zionist Jew and Clinton retread, Fried is currently the State Department’s Assistant Secretary for Europe and Eurasian Affairs, responsible for the division that handles NATO enlargement and coordination with the European Union on the war on terror.

 

Acting on behalf of the US State Department, this Zionist Jew, Fried, opposed Congress’ Armenian Genocide Resolution. Fried stated that recognizing the 1915 Armenian genocide by Muslim Turks, (plotted by Zionist Jews), would “damage US interests�.

 

As Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs during the Clinton administration, this Zionist Jew, Fried, supported the bombing of Christian Serbs during the Kosovo crisis in 1999.

Car Czar - Steven Rattner. Director of Obama’s Presidential Task Force on the Auto Industry. Rattner is a Zionist Jew and former executive with three Jewish banks: Lehman Brothers, Morgan Stanley, and Lazard Freres.

 

Rattner, who reported his overall networth of between $188 million and $608 million, enjoys a close friendship with New York Times owner, Arthur Sulzberger, NY Governor financial magnate, Michael Bloomberg.

 

How then could Rattner ever act on behalf of America’s interests and the common Gentile laborer with his intimate Zionist-Jewish ties? How then could Rattner, with his millions of Zionist-earned dollars, ever relate to the Gentile common laborer who has lost his UAW health-care benefits?

 

Border Czar - Alan Bersin. Director of Obama’s Special Representative For Border Affairs. Raised as a Talmudic Jew, Bersin’s appointment brings yet another Jew to America’s Department of Homeland Security, of which, Bersin is now a Zionist insider by serving as Assistant Secretary for International Affairs.

 

Climate Czar - Todd Stern. Named by Obama as Envoy for Climate Change. Stern is a Zionist Jew and longtime friend and advisor to both Hillary and former President Bill Clinton. Stern, a Clinton retread, served as his staff secretary.

 

Currently, Stern is a senior fellow at the Zionist “think tank�, Center for American Progress, funded & staffed by Zionist Jews. Stern promotes the Center’s Zionist ideology of perpetual war for perpetual peace in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the Middle East, all in the name of “US security�.

 

Global Warming Czar - Carol Browner. Appointed by Obama as Energy Coordinator. Browner, yet another Clinton retread as administrator of the EPA, was listed until recently as one of 14 leaders of a socialist group, Socialist International, that advocates “global governance�.

 

The Washington Times reported that Browner’s name was listed on the member’s Web page for Socialist International. But Browner, not wishing to prompt objections to her White House appointment due to her socialist ideology, asked the organization to remove her name and biography from their site.

 

 

Just trying to educate some of you......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OH NO, JEWS!!!!

 

I see your point now WMM! How have I been so blind! JEWS!!!!!!

 

 

 

 

Once again, you aren't intelligent enough to answer questions. Explain why he's the 1st President to take over everything and have 33 Czars. Why is has he spent more money than 43 previous Presidents combined during a recession, deflating the US dollar to an all time low?

 

Once again, you have no answers to any questions. I'm not surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bush had Czars as well. It's just a title... You seem to think the American government is stupid half the time, and so ingenious that only a select few can see through their motives the other half of the times. Pick one.

 

If Obama would be stupid enough to bring a Russian Czar-like administrator to the government, don't you think he'd call it something other than a Czar..? While I do agree that the role they play is rather intrusive and not needed, there's no way someone can possibly think that we're turning America into Russia of the 1500-1700's...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bush had Czars as well. It's just a title... You seem to think the American government is stupid half the time, and so ingenious that only a select few can see through their motives the other half of the times. Pick one.

 

If Obama would be stupid enough to bring a Russian Czar-like administrator to the government, don't you think he'd call it something other than a Czar..? While I do agree that the role they play is rather intrusive and not needed, there's no way someone can possibly think that we're turning America into Russia of the 1500-1700's...

 

 

 

Sure, I believe that. People are quick to say, "OMG you're crazy if you think we are Russia or heading for slavery".

 

The government is doing it in a subtle way but more people are waking up, writing books like Glenn Beck and Ron Paul, and Obama's approval rating drops every single day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bush had Czars as well. It's just a title... You seem to think the American government is stupid half the time, and so ingenious that only a select few can see through their motives the other half of the times. Pick one.

 

If Obama would be stupid enough to bring a Russian Czar-like administrator to the government, don't you think he'd call it something other than a Czar..? While I do agree that the role they play is rather intrusive and not needed, there's no way someone can possibly think that we're turning America into Russia of the 1500-1700's...

 

 

 

Sure, I believe that. People are quick to say, "OMG you're crazy if you think we are Russia or heading for slavery".

 

The government is doing it in a subtle way but more people are waking up, writing books like Glenn Beck and Ron Paul, and Obama's approval rating drops every single day.

 

This is why you can't read a book without checking a critique from the opposing view. Right-wing books (and liberal books as well) are notorious for having a bunch of crazy bias. The problem with people today is that they blurt out all the crap they hear or read and that isn't always correct. You need to see what the opposing side says and THEN make a decision.

 

Go to www.mediamatters.com and wwww.aim.org

 

Media Matters is liberal and AIM is conservative. While they're both bulls*** and are as selective as the authors, it should help you mold a better opinion because the stuff they say, for the most part, has a degree of truth in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read Ron Paul's Revolution. That will help you.

 

 

I can't really come up with a rebuttal, because I've said all I could regarding the matter in the post that you're replying to. I assume that you've read it. If you have and still reply with this, then I can't really help you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really just can't comprehend anybody disagreeing with Ron Paul as a whole, maybe just on certain topics. He is the most intelligent, logical politician out there.

 

 

I supported him the beginning of the Primaries, but quickly changed to McCain when I heard him actually talk about handling Hurricane Katrina.

 

I like moderation. He seems to be too infatuated with his political ideology for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really just can't comprehend anybody disagreeing with Ron Paul as a whole, maybe just on certain topics. He is the most intelligent, logical politician out there.

 

Just knowing that a person of your ilk thinks so highly of Ron Paul is I imagine causing some of his followers who aren't racist whackadoos to question there own judgement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WMM is probably interested in knowing that Obama's newly appointed science czar co-authored a book in 1977 called Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment, where he advocates forced abortions by the federal government, the mandatory seizure of children from their parents, and eugenic practices such as selective breeding and forced sterilization. He also went as far as to suggest that the government could induce mass sterilization by placing drugs in drinking water.

 

 

You've got to be kidding me..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WMM is probably interested in knowing that Obama's newly appointed science czar co-authored a book in 1977 called Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment, where he advocates forced abortions by the federal government, the mandatory seizure of children from their parents, and eugenic practices such as selective breeding and forced sterilization. He also went as far as to suggest that the government could induce mass sterilization by placing drugs in drinking water.

 

 

You've got to be kidding me..

He's not kidding you, but he's not exactly telling the truth either. The science czar did indeed sign off on a book that he co-authored 30 years ago that in part spoke to "hypothetical" scenarios that included all of the above. The book did not advocate any of this, as Penguino says. It talks about these things in theory, as hypothetical possibilities.

.

.

The whole idea that Penguino raises is sooooooooo far out there that even the right wing nutjob whackadoo web sites have done little more than mention it. I doubt that Penguino really believes this ultra-extremo-right-wing-nut-job talk. He's just trying to troll or gin up some controversy.

.

.

Back in reality, if you want neo-Malthusian "overpopulation" talk to become reality....just vote for Ron Paul. The economic policy that he advocates would certainly lead to tens of millions of people dying before their time. Mal-investments, I guess that's what we'd call the unlucky people caught up in a goverment that throws them nothing when they need a lifevest as the market works things out during a deep recession.

.

Just vote for Ron Paul and hope that your Mom or Dad doesn't wind up 6 feet under in Malinvestment Gardens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Did you ever get a hold of a copy of the book?

 

Because Politifact went over this the other day, and they said this:

 

But with regard to Beck's claim that Holdren "has proposed forcing abortions and putting sterilants in the drinking water to control population," the text of the book clearly does not support that. We think a thorough reading shows that these were ideas presented as approaches that had been discussed. They were not posed as suggestions or proposals. In fact, the authors make clear that they did not support coercive means of population control. Certainly, nowhere in the book do the authors advocate for forced abortions.

 

Some have argued that Holdren's view of the imminent and grave global dangers posed by overpopulation should provide pause, given Holdren's current view that global warming now presents imminent and grave global dangers. That's a matter for reasoned debate.

 

But in seeking to score points for a political argument, Beck seriously mischaracterizes Holdren's positions. Holdren didn't advocate those ideas then. And, when asked at a Senate confirmation hearing, Holdren said he did not support them now. We think it's irresponsible to pluck a few lines from a 1,000-page, 30-year-old textbook, and then present them out of context to dismiss Holdren's long and distinguished career. And we rate Beck's claim Pants on Fire!

 

http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/jul/29/glenn-beck/glenn-beck-claims-science-czar-john-holdren-propos/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Holdren is certainly bat-sh*t crazy, but he isn't wrong about everything. Nuclear power is a good way to reduce emissions.

 

I'm not doubting you, but I have never heard him say that. Frankly, I would be shocked if he advocated something so intelligent.

 

His position combat emissions is dominated by his theories of geo-engineering or the deliberate release of pollution to control the climate.

 

Holdren advocated nuclear power, it is readily available public information that dates from the same time as his absurd overpopulation predictions. Not defending the man, just pointing out that he isn't always wrong (but then again a broken clock is right twice a day).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Guest

Has man caused global warming been completely debunked yet?

 

As for trees, I know this one whos a real jerk. Always slapping me in the face with its limbs as I try to mow under it. Just trying to keep it pretty, but nooooooooooo it dont want none of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the environment should have legal rights just like the rest of us...if you exist, you should have a right to continue to do so

 

Are you joking?

 

You think inanimate objects should be viewed as equals to human under the law? Cutting down a tree should entail the same legal processes as capital punishment?

 

Why not just treat trees and rivers as property and use the legal system to protect property rights?

yeah all those great national parks are a f***ing waste

 

we should urbanize everything

 

backyards? they are for suckers...f*** it, lets tear every tree down and rip every plant out and then we can start killing fat people and using them as our main source of meat so that we dont have to worry about cows or fat people and their farts hurting the ozone

 

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah all those great national parks are a f***ing waste

 

we should urbanize everything

 

backyards? they are for suckers...f*** it, lets tear every tree down and rip every plant out and then we can start killing fat people and using them as our main source of meat so that we dont have to worry about cows or fat people and their farts hurting the ozone

 

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

 

 

Must be some good stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



×
×
  • Create New...