Jump to content

Tyler Colvin signed


Guest Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts


Has half-decent power, too [20 HR in 2010, 18 in 2012].

 

I can dig it.

 

 

Wrigley, brah. He got almost as many ABs in SF last year and hit a whopping two.

 

 

 

139 is "almost as many" as 358? Wow, how am I in Calculus 3 without ever knowing this simple math? I am so dumb.

 

I guess 11 < 9, too, because in 2010, he had 11 homers away from Wrigley (guess where the 9 came from).

 

2012 you have more of a point, 11 of his 18 homers came at Coors.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has half-decent power, too [20 HR in 2010, 18 in 2012].

 

I can dig it.

 

 

Wrigley, brah. He got almost as many ABs in SF last year and hit a whopping two.

 

 

 

139 is "almost as many" as 358? Wow, how am I in Calculus 3 without ever knowing this simple math? I am so dumb.

 

I guess 11 < 9, too, because in 2010, he had 11 homers away from Wrigley (guess where the 9 came from).

 

2012 you have more of a point, 11 of his 18 homers came at Coors.

 

 

 

 

9 at Wrigley, 2 at Minute Maid, 1 at GABP, 2 at Miller. And yeah, 2012 I'm not even going to go in to.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has half-decent power, too [20 HR in 2010, 18 in 2012].

I can dig it.

 

 

 

Wrigley, brah. He got almost as many ABs in SF last year and hit a whopping two.

 

139 is "almost as many" as 358? Wow, how am I in Calculus 3 without ever knowing this simple math? I am so dumb.

 

I guess 11 < 9, too, because in 2010, he had 11 homers away from Wrigley (guess where the 9 came from).

 

 

 

2012 you have more of a point, 11 of his 18 homers came at Coors.

 

 

9 at Wrigley, 2 at Minute Maid, 1 at GABP, 2 at Miller. And yeah, 2012 I'm not even going to go in to.

 

He has just as much pop if not more than Ruggiano. I'll take that from my 4th-5th OFer any day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has half-decent power, too [20 HR in 2010, 18 in 2012].

 

I can dig it.

 

 

Wrigley, brah. He got almost as many ABs in SF last year and hit a whopping two.

 

 

 

139 is "almost as many" as 358? Wow, how am I in Calculus 3 without ever knowing this simple math? I am so dumb.

 

I guess 11 < 9, too, because in 2010, he had 11 homers away from Wrigley (guess where the 9 came from).

 

2012 you have more of a point, 11 of his 18 homers came at Coors.

 

 

 

 

9 at Wrigley, 2 at Minute Maid, 1 at GABP, 2 at Miller. And yeah, 2012 I'm not even going to go in to.

 

 

 

And also 1 at Turner, 1 at Safeco, 1 at AT&T, 1 at Busch, and 1 at Nationals Park. [And also 1 at US Cellular]

 

Are you even going to address the 139 being "almost as many" as 358? Cause I mean ... *shrug*

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has half-decent power, too [20 HR in 2010, 18 in 2012].

 

I can dig it.

 

 

Wrigley, brah. He got almost as many ABs in SF last year and hit a whopping two.

 

 

 

139 is "almost as many" as 358? Wow, how am I in Calculus 3 without ever knowing this simple math? I am so dumb.

 

I guess 11 < 9, too, because in 2010, he had 11 homers away from Wrigley (guess where the 9 came from).

 

2012 you have more of a point, 11 of his 18 homers came at Coors.

 

 

 

 

9 at Wrigley, 2 at Minute Maid, 1 at GABP, 2 at Miller. And yeah, 2012 I'm not even going to go in to.

 

 

 

And also 1 at Turner, 1 at Safeco, 1 at AT&T, 1 at Busch, and 1 at Nationals Park. [And also 1 at US Cellular]

 

Are you even going to address the 139 being "almost as many" as 358? Cause I mean ... *shrug*

 

 

 

 

So 14 at hitters parks vs 6 at not (quite) hitters parks.

 

He doesn't have a lot of power. It's cool. He's not starting. So it doesn't really matter. He's decent bench fodder. Move on.

 

And as for the ABs, I looked at the wrong column. There. I said it.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So 14 at hitters parks vs 6 at not (quite) hitters parks.

 

He doesn't have a lot of power. It's cool. He's not starting. So it doesn't really matter. He's decent bench fodder. Move on.

 

And as for the ABs, I looked at the wrong column. There. I said it.

 

Have you you ever watched Colvin play or are you just using stats to make decisions for you? He has a good amount of pop so I'm guessing the latter.

Side note: Kinda funny that you say he isn't starting so it doesn't matter....and your name is benched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So 14 at hitters parks vs 6 at not (quite) hitters parks.

 

He doesn't have a lot of power. It's cool. He's not starting. So it doesn't really matter. He's decent bench fodder. Move on.

 

And as for the ABs, I looked at the wrong column. There. I said it.

 

6 of his 20 = 30% of home runs that year not at hitters parks. And half of those were at cavernous ballparks.

 

You're right, he won't be starting, which is why I'm cool with this signing and why I said "he has decent pop".

 

Monkey feet.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



×
×
  • Create New...