SonOfJack 2,970 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 [MEDIA=twitter]1217870769998442496[/MEDIA] Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FishFan95 1,048 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Classic Mets. Lol. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SonOfJack 2,970 Posted January 16, 2020 Author Share Posted January 16, 2020 [MEDIA=twitter]1217877625483468802[/MEDIA] Quote Link to post Share on other sites
el_gmac 433 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 [MEDIA=twitter]1217872158900346887[/MEDIA] Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SilverBullet 2,970 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Best manager in Mets history. Never lost a game. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SilverBullet 2,970 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Nice job Manfred, you got your wish when you specifically named Beltran even though you said no players would be punished. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Michael 2,818 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Nice job Manfred, you got your wish when you specifically named Beltran even though you said no players would be punished. He wasn't punished as a player. At least ... not yet. Watch how much this effects his HOF candidacy in a couple years. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SilverBullet 2,970 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 He wasn't punished as a player. At least ... not yet. Watch how much this effects his HOF candidacy in a couple years. He was punished because his name was put out there when it didn't need to be. Manfred could have told the Mets about this in private. If no players were being punished then Beltran's name should have been left out because Beltran was a player during the time that the investigation is covering. Manfred wanted Beltran out so he threw his name out there to cast a shadow over him. If we're gonna do that to Beltran we should name every single player who was involved in the situation because I'm positive Beltran wasn't the only one. Name them all or name none but to name specifically one is pretty cheap. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Michael 2,818 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 He was punished because his name was put out there when it didn't need to be. Manfred could have told the Mets about this in private. If no players were being punished then Beltran's name should have been left out because Beltran was a player during the time that the investigation is covering. Manfred wanted Beltran out so he threw his name out there to cast a shadow over him. If we're gonna do that to Beltran we should name every single player who was involved in the situation because I'm positive Beltran wasn't the only one. Name them all or name none but to name specifically one is pretty cheap. Someone on the Tweetle said this was basically MLB's (or Manfred's) way of saying "we gave Beltran immunity for telling us the truth but he lied to you all." Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SonOfJack 2,970 Posted January 16, 2020 Author Share Posted January 16, 2020 [MEDIA=twitter]1217901498417532931[/MEDIA] Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SonOfJack 2,970 Posted January 16, 2020 Author Share Posted January 16, 2020 This leads to the question, what does Manfred know? Does he know more about player involvement and kept it quiet since he wasn't punishing them? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SonOfJack 2,970 Posted January 16, 2020 Author Share Posted January 16, 2020 [MEDIA=twitter]1217902159053905923[/MEDIA] Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SilverBullet 2,970 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 [MEDIA=twitter]1217902159053905923[/MEDIA] He better not get the full contract, he literally didn't manage a single minute on any field. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SonOfJack 2,970 Posted January 16, 2020 Author Share Posted January 16, 2020 He better not get the full contract, he literally didn't manage a single minute on any field. You seem concerned about the finances of the Wilpons Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Das Texan 169 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Nice job Manfred, you got your wish when you specifically named Beltran even though you said no players would be punished. It was also no players that told the truth and didnt withhold info..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Das Texan 169 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 He was punished because his name was put out there when it didn't need to be. Manfred could have told the Mets about this in private. If no players were being punished then Beltran's name should have been left out because Beltran was a player during the time that the investigation is covering. Manfred wanted Beltran out so he threw his name out there to cast a shadow over him. If we're gonna do that to Beltran we should name every single player who was involved in the situation because I'm positive Beltran wasn't the only one. Name them all or name none but to name specifically one is pretty cheap. Players were given full immunity and anonomity with the caveat being they must tell the truth about all of what they knew. If they failed in doing that then.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Das Texan 169 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 You seem concerned about the finances of the Wilpons Hey it could limit them in who they hire now (only semi joking) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rmc523 707 Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 They didn't give Beltran any of his salary, but they're donating $200k to his charity. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SonOfJack 2,970 Posted January 17, 2020 Author Share Posted January 17, 2020 They didn't give Beltran any of his salary, but they're donating $200k to his charity. I like it Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Das Texan 169 Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 They didn't give Beltran any of his salary, but they're donating $200k to his charity. Seriously tells you all you need to know. i.e. he lied in his job interview. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SonOfJack 2,970 Posted January 18, 2020 Author Share Posted January 18, 2020 https://nypost.com/2020/01/17/mets-managerial-search-dusty-baker-is-under-consideration/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.