Heyman Shoots on TNA Wrestling: "I don't think TNA is even a consideration to anyone in this industry. I wish that they were, but the problem with TNA is they never branded themselves. Instead of taking advantage of a tremendous opportunity, they complained. They said, `I've been held back. I wasn't given an opportunity. I didn't get this. I didn't get that".

 

Heyman says another another thing they did in TNA wrongwas that they didn't brand new stars to be their stars. They didn't make Samoa Joe their star. They didn't make Abyss their lead star. They should have taken these lead guys and branded them so people identify them directly with TNA.

 

 

This interview is definitely worth a look if you want to know what the new ECW is all about. The link is below:

 

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/sport...erald_wrestling

He's pretty much right.

 

How long has Jeff Jarrett main evented, again?

 

Also, and I hate to do this, but man Christian as a face? Are you stupid? It kind of worked at first, when he was on this mission to win the title, but the stuff I've seen since, sucks. He looks like he could care less.

 

That being said, the TNA comprises only a little part of that interview. Heyman's saying all the right things and the rest of the interview is definitely worth reading for any fan.

Yeah, Heyman pretty much nailed everything on the head in that article for the most part and I did rather enjoy his jabs at BG & Kip James about their complaining. However, I feel he was wrong about not branding new stars as anyone can see clear as day that Samoa Joe is well on his way to being on the top of the roster. Still, as long as Vince keeps his nose out of ECW, I'm interested in seeing what Heyman can do as I feel he's one of the best bookers in the business.

 

He's pretty much right.

 

How long has Jeff Jarrett main evented, again?

 

 

Save for an episode or two of iMPACT!, Jeff Jarrett hasn't main evented since he lost the title to Christian months ago.

Yeah, Heyman pretty much nailed everything on the head in that article for the most part and I did rather enjoy his jabs at BG & Kip James about their complaining. However, I feel he was wrong about not branding new stars as anyone can see clear as day that Samoa Joe is well on his way to being on the top of the roster. Still, as long as Vince keeps his nose out of ECW, I'm interested in seeing what Heyman can do as I feel he's one of the best bookers in the business.

 

He's pretty much right.

 

How long has Jeff Jarrett main evented, again?

 

 

Save for an episode or two of iMPACT!, Jeff Jarrett hasn't main evented since he lost the title to Christian months ago.

 

Yeah, Christian. He's been so "awesome" lately.

You know what, he's still putting on very good matches at the PPV's, but you wouldn't know that because you don't watch them.

You know what, he's still putting on very good matches at the PPV's, but you wouldn't know that because you don't watch them.

 

 

Yeah, wouldn't waste my time or money watching the one guy I like in the fed being mediocre on-mic and in-ring. You're right. Good point.

You know what, he's still putting on very good matches at the PPV's, but you wouldn't know that because you don't watch them.

 

 

Yeah, wouldn't waste my time or money watching the one guy I like in the fed being mediocre on-mic and in-ring. You're right. Good point.

 

You don't like mediocre ring work, and yet you're such a big RAW fan. :blink: :lol

You know what, he's still putting on very good matches at the PPV's, but you wouldn't know that because you don't watch them.

 

 

Yeah, wouldn't waste my time or money watching the one guy I like in the fed being mediocre on-mic and in-ring. You're right. Good point.

 

You don't like mediocre ring work, and yet you're such a big RAW fan. :blink: :lol

 

Good point.

 

Everyone on RAW sucks and yet you still find reasons to watch it. I no longer lower myself to watching TNA. Who's the bigger loser? I'd argue it's you by virtue of that fact that you watching something you clearly hate.

 

RAW main eventers are all good. So... *shrugs* (waits for next feeble argument on taste preference)

You know what, he's still putting on very good matches at the PPV's, but you wouldn't know that because you don't watch them.

 

 

Yeah, wouldn't waste my time or money watching the one guy I like in the fed being mediocre on-mic and in-ring. You're right. Good point.

 

You don't like mediocre ring work, and yet you're such a big RAW fan. :blink: :lol

 

Good point.

 

Everyone on RAW sucks and yet you still find reasons to watch it. I no longer lower myself to watching TNA. Who's the bigger loser? I'd argue it's you by virtue of that fact that you watching something you clearly hate.

 

RAW main eventers are all good. So... *shrugs* (waits for next feeble argument on taste preference)

 

Have you been reading my posts? If you have, you'd know that save for this past Monday, I haven't watched RAW in at least a month or so. Also, I said nothing about the talent on RAW. My complaint has always been the piss poor story lines and matches of 3 minutes or less. I have never criticized the talent. The reason the ring work on RAW is so piss poor is because they don't give the talent a chance to shine like I know they can. It's pretty sad that a wrestling program over two hours long has less than 30 minutes of wrestling in it. I'm sorry, but I'd rather watch a fifteen minute match than hear Vince talk about how wonderful his ass is.