he admitted to there being none, which kind of throws the justification for the war out the window.

 

Reporter: Mr. Bush, how do you consider yourself and your party "prolife" when you control all branches of gvovernment and therefore could make an attempt to illegalize it?

 

 

Bush:I say stuff all the time I don't mean. C'mon, these prolifers really can't think politicians really care about fetuses when we blow people apart for no reason. C'mon!

Al Sharpton is the mizan!

I guess I'm for Edwards. If Kerry wins out, then I am not voting. Period.

you have to vote, just vote for a third party then. Yes, Mein Fuhr.

okay, at ease

No WMD stockpile, damn, of course it doesnt matter that Iraq was redeveloping programs and what the hell happened to all the weapons they had in the mid-90s, no record of them being destroyed anywhere either. And that damn Bush he got rid of a dictator that is responsible for thousands of deaths and tortures. What a horrible turn of events. Saddam should be reinstated!!! (Im being sarcastic of course)

No WMD stockpile, damn, of course it doesnt matter that Iraq was redeveloping programs and what the hell happened to all the weapons they had in the mid-90s, no record of them being destroyed anywhere either. And that damn Bush he got rid of a dictator that is responsible for thousands of deaths and tortures. What a horrible turn of events. Saddam should be reinstated!!! (Im being sarcastic of course)

Uh, Bush himself said "THERE ARE NO WEAPONS." SO he is lying to you then or now.

 

And there are cheaper ways to help people than taking out saddam which costs billions.

I never said the weapons were in Iraq, but the programs are. And what happened to the weapons that Iraq had, that were found in the late 1990s by UN inspectors. No record of them being destroyed. Anyoen in common sense has to question that. Obviously they arent in Iraq, could be in Syria, who knows.

I never said the weapons were in Iraq, but the programs are. And what happened to the weapons that Iraq had, that were found in the late 1990s by UN inspectors. No record of them being destroyed. Anyoen in common sense has to question that. Obviously they arent in Iraq, could be in Syria, who knows.

-Yeah, if weapons are in syria years ago what does that have to do with bombing Iraq now?

 

-Bush told the UN and Nation SEVERAL times there were tangible weapons, not programs. North Korea has a nuclear bomb and rocket program. How do we know? They show videos of it on TV.

 

Proof that bush lied to you:http://www.xanga.com/item.aspx?user=craigramblings&tab=weblogs&uid=62712751

 

 

simply weapon programs aren't the threat necessary to get our country to waste billions of dollars. I would rather have that money back in american pockets.

 

And YOU are simply illogical if you cannot admit that Bush lied to you and the outcome of the war wasn't worth billions upon billions.

Bush did not lie to anyone, his intelligence told him there were weapons, and thats how he made his judgement, it wasnt like he knew all along. Second what should we do wait for Iraq to redevelop the weapons and then attack them once theyve rearmed? Plus, the reason Iraqi weapons were a concern was b/c they signed a disarmament treaty after the first Gulf War. And the fact still remains that Iraq has sponsored terror

Weapons "Still hanging around in iraq" were from the first gulf war.

 

Bush was might happy to use "evidence" that suited his agenda.

 

Powell presented fake evidence to the UN, fabricated evidence IS A LIE, such as WRONG satellite photos.

 

Therefore, Bush not only "was misled" like an idiot, but outright lied.