February 9, 200521 yr RICHMOND, Virginia (AP) -- Virginians who wear their pants so low their underwear shows may want to think about investing in a stronger belt. The state's House of Delegates passed a bill Tuesday authorizing a $50 fine for anyone who displays his or her underpants in a "lewd or indecent manner." Del. Lionell Spruill Sr., a Democrat who opposed the bill, had pleaded with his colleagues to remember their own youthful fashion follies. During an extended monologue Monday, he talked about how they dressed or wore their hair in their teens. On Tuesday, he said the measure was an unconstitutional attack on young blacks that would force parents to take off work to accompany their children to court just for making a fashion statement. "This is a foolish bill, Mr. Speaker, because it will hurt so many," Spruill said before the measure was approved 60-34. It now goes to the state Senate. The bill's sponsor, Del. Algie T. Howell, has said constituents were offended by the exposed underwear. He did not speak on the floor Tuesday. Spruill and Howell, also a Democrat, are both black. We'll see if it actually passes
February 9, 200521 yr Walking to the student square this morning (Turlington) I saw a girl with her thong tucked into her shirt in the back. New fad or just a mistake? Looked lame.
February 9, 200521 yr Walking to the student square this morning (Turlington) I saw a girl with her thong tucked into her shirt in the back. New fad or just a mistake? Looked lame. 681149[/snapback] I dunno about you, but I like the chicks who wear the low rider pants, and no panties and then are in one of those turlington lecture rooms, where the seats don't have the full backs. I see more tops of bums in a day than a man should in a lifetime. However, I won't complain, most of the sights are nice and tan... oh yeah and round.
February 9, 200521 yr Walking to the student square this morning (Turlington) I saw a girl with her thong tucked into her shirt in the back.? New fad or just a mistake?? Looked lame. 681149[/snapback] I dunno about you, but I like the chicks who wear the low rider pants, and no panties and then are in one of those turlington lecture rooms, where the seats don't have the full backs. I see more tops of bums in a day than a man should in a lifetime. However, I won't complain, most of the sights are nice and tan... oh yeah and round. 681232[/snapback] Hell yes. Her shirt was blocking the plumpness though.
February 9, 200521 yr Walking to the student square this morning (Turlington) I saw a girl with her thong tucked into her shirt in the back. New fad or just a mistake? Looked lame. 681149[/snapback] I dunno about you, but I like the chicks who wear the low rider pants, and no panties and then are in one of those turlington lecture rooms, where the seats don't have the full backs. I see more tops of bums in a day than a man should in a lifetime. However, I won't complain, most of the sights are nice and tan... oh yeah and round. 681232[/snapback] Hell yes. Her shirt was blocking the plumpness though. 681245[/snapback] Man what are you still doing here, you were borne in '82? :whistle
February 9, 200521 yr What a retarded bill. Waste of taxpayer money and another stupid law that no one will enforce unless they're an a**hole. In other words, thongs are cool.
February 10, 200521 yr Folks up in the Commonwealth of Virginia think that this is a profiling bill. No The bill is not profiling, I think people should wear their pants around their waste for crying out loud, but I have a feeling only blacks are going to catch the heat for this
February 10, 200521 yr Folks up in the Commonwealth of Virginia think that this is a profiling bill. No The bill is not profiling, I think people should wear their pants around their waste for crying out loud, but I have a feeling only blacks are going to catch the heat for this 681500[/snapback] Of course it's for profiling. I doubt some cop is gonna come up to some rich white girl int he suburbs, throw on his lights then write her a $50 ticket because you can see the top of her thong. Then again, perhaps said cop writes the ticket so the "assailant" can use some unique methods to work herself out of the ticket. :mischief2 *Suddenly likes the idea more and more* :hat
February 10, 200521 yr Folks up in the Commonwealth of Virginia think that this is a profiling bill. No The bill is not profiling, I think people should wear their pants around their waste for crying out loud, but I have a feeling only blacks are going to catch the heat for this 681500[/snapback] Of course it's for profiling. I doubt some cop is gonna come up to some rich white girl int he suburbs, throw on his lights then write her a $50 ticket because you can see the top of her thong. Then again, perhaps said cop writes the ticket so the "assailant" can use some unique methods to work herself out of the ticket. :mischief2 *Suddenly likes the idea more and more* :hat 681507[/snapback] *considers becoming cop* Actually, I was trying to say that the intent of the bill is not to profile, however, it will be enforced unfairly.
February 10, 200521 yr What'll happen is someone will produce a line of bags with faux shorts sewn in at the top so they just look like they're hanging out. When the cops have a dude drop his pants for an inspection and see him wearing fully complete and covered BVD's underneath, they'll have no case. 681510[/snapback] Cop: Sir, would you please drop your pants? This will only take a second. Guy: *Runs*
February 10, 200521 yr What'll happen is someone will produce a line of bags with faux shorts sewn in at the top so they just look like they're hanging out. When the cops have a dude drop his pants for an inspection and see him wearing fully complete and covered BVD's underneath, they'll have no case. 681510[/snapback] Cop: Sir, would you please drop your pants? This will only take a second. Guy: *Runs* 681514[/snapback] Oh, Mr. Officer!!! :elefant
February 10, 200521 yr What'll happen is someone will produce a line of bags with faux shorts sewn in at the top so they just look like they're hanging out. When the cops have a dude drop his pants for an inspection and see him wearing fully complete and covered BVD's underneath, they'll have no case. 681510[/snapback] They already make those. It's even more retarded than the real thing.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.