September 1, 200322 yr ok, ok, ok, it seems like all of the "experts" dont like this deal because of what we gave up. I would have prefered to hold onto Bautista in the long run BUT this move is done for the playoff run and like many people on this board have written if we get to the playoffs it is all worth it. prospects arent a sure thing, what if Bautista ends up being the next Carl Pavano? Just a few positive words to remember.
September 1, 200322 yr Carl Pavano had Alot Talent. He is just never gonna reach his full potential. i mean you gotta have alot of talent if you were dealt for Pedro Martinez...
September 1, 200322 yr REMEMBER WHAT I TOLD YOU #1FISHFAN!I TOLD YOU DON'T WORRY I GOTTA FEELING YOUR CONINE WISH WILL BE GRANTED,WELL IT WAS!
September 1, 200322 yr I am extreamely shocked we traded for Conine, and not. They gave up Bautista basically because we already have so much pitching, that next year or even the year after, he won't be able to crack the rotation. I still say Sanders or Stairs would be better, because they don't have to learn a new league, but oh well. This trade is amazing for our future (next year, basically) and good for this year. Great job, Admin.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.