Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

The county continues to prepare its proposal to the team. It was not submitted this week, as I was previously informed. This site is going to be pitched to the team in the near future, I just don't know when. The county is doing the usual rain and traffic studies. Speaking of rain, my information is that the stadium being proposed on this site will not have a roof either. I think the roof is being eliminated for similar reasons as the Orange Bowl site - cost and size. A roof requires significantly more land from what I understand. This site still lacks a financing proposal so don't get too excited but with no land or roof cost they can't be too far off.

so is there anything good about this site? i thought it was going to be awesome...

  • Author

IMO, other than access this site is awesome.

IMO, other than access this site is awesome.

bad access

no roof

 

AWESOME!!!!

gobucks, I hope you are right. I'm dying to see the proposal, so the Fish at least have another viable option out there.

 

Can a roof be added later like on the OB?

I'm still guessing its the easternmost lot at PPS or as a fall back the FDOT site in Golden Glades.

  • Author

Mordecai,

 

I said the "site" was awesome. Most of the stadium design issues are and were unknown to me.

  • Author

Marlins 2003,

 

I do not want to get into a guessing game and I have tried to stay away from commenting on guesses. One question: Do you think the access to Joe Robbie is bad?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...