Bush Versus Bush

 

vs.

 

I am a registered Republican and sadly it is law in New York State that I cannot vote for in the Democrat Primaries, because being a registered Republican makes my mind all of the sudden lose any decision making power for a party I can theoretically vote for come November. So pretty much my party's choice is, "Bush or Bush."

 

I hate the crappy choices we are given in the regular election, but the lack of a Republican primary makes the choices even more so narrow! Most of the time the party in power avoids the primary to save money, but even Clinton had some resistance. Bush has absolutely none, assuming that Bush does not screw things up for Bush. However, his weak, crappy, or bad stances on the issues are supported by the American population or are they?

 

 

 

Bush vs. Bush on killing

 

 

Bush loves killing. Whether it is the right to bear assault rifles and kill people, the right to bomb anyone and kill people, and the right to kill murderers via the death penalty, Bush loves to kill. However, how does he fair against Bush?

 

When people die they push up daisies, or bushes for that matter. Bush loves the idea of dead people and American expansionism. With Iraq and Afghanistan taken over, there's sure to be more irrigation, which leads to more bushes! Furthermore, the bush's greatest enemy is the human being, so the more dead the merrier. Bush has been seen at numerous pro War on Iraq rallies during March and also a lot of pro choice rallies as well.

 

Who does America love more? Bush, because he likes killing and is pro life, unlike Bush.

 

My take? I believe that every American has the right to own an assault weapon. The second amendment states that the state has the right to an armed militia, but the "right of the people to bear arms" seems to mean this encompasses more than just a militia. I also like Bush's stance on abortion (the plant that is.) However, I do not like thheir gross distaste for human life.

 

 

 

Bush vs. Bush on plants

 

 

Bush loves plants, whether they be the millions of acres of plants protected by an act he passed protecting land surround highways to lowered EPA standards concerning coal power plant emissions. Hell, he loves plants so much he wouldn't let the Kyoto treaty stand in his way.

 

 

Bush loves plants. They keep shooting out carbon dioxide and pesticides, the more the merrier. Bush's know they can live through anything, hell they are growing aroud Chernobyl already! Furthermore, this is consistant with Bush's pro-killing human policy.

 

Who does America love more? America dislikes both, because they dislike pollution and love the Kyoto Treaty...even though they don't know too much about it.

 

My take? Bush or Bush are not exactly "Mister Environment", but the one good thing to come out of Bush's anti-environment policies was the non-signing of the flawed Kyoto Treaty.

 

 

 

Bush vs. Bush on government

 

Bush was a democratically elected dicatator. No, I'm not one of those idiots who says, "There were shady voting laws in Florida!" He won that election. None the less, anythin Bush has wanted done, he has got done. Votes for wars, for tax cuts, for new executive departments, Bush wanted it, he got it. I do not think an executive held this much power since the Roosevelt dictatorship of 1933 to 1945.

 

The Bush, as an old fashioned plant, favors monarchy, because Bush's keep on spreading their kind, so it would be most beneficial to the Bush to have a dynasty. The Bush's official dictum? "Grass might be greener on the other side, but the greenest side is the Bush side."

 

Who does America love more? Americans love a strong exectuive and so the question is who would provide a stronger one.

 

My take? Total party domination of the excecutive and legislative branches contains no balance of ideological powers. Both Bush's way of thinking is contrary to the best interests of the people.

 

 

 

What's the point of this? Is Bush different from Bush? People have to realize we have to demand better choices then the ones we are being given.

why are you a registered republican?

I'm conservative concerning spending. Very conservative. I hate Bush (the human) more because of his high spending than his social issues.

Why don't you just unregister as a Republican for the primary, then re-register afterwards. I had a local politican from Adams County, PA telling us that that isn't illegal and that we should all do it; that way we have a say in the whole process. Granted, it is too difficult for me to change because I live in CT and go to school in PA, but because you are still in-state, it probably wouldn't be as hard.

its part of the STUPID rules of this nation in terms of the voting process.

 

 

thank goodness I live in Texas and can do what i want as a voter.

 

 

 

 

PS...I am registered nothing.

Why don't you just unregister as a Republican for the primary, then re-register afterwards. I had a local politican from Adams County, PA telling us that that isn't illegal and that we should all do it; that way we have a say in the whole process. Granted, it is too difficult for me to change because I live in CT and go to school in PA, but because you are still in-state, it probably wouldn't be as hard.

I live too far away from where I live and quite frankly I find it dishonest to keep switching parties, though it is not the worse thing on Earth.

 

However, this is not the subject at hand.