April 20, 200422 yr i dont think dillon will be a big hit in new england. remember terry glenn? bellicheck seems like a no nonsense kind of coach good pick on both sides. pats give up a 2nd rounder for a very good RB and bengals open it up for RUDI
April 20, 200422 yr I'm not sure what to think....the Pats won as a team, not because they had a superstar on the team. Brady is close to that tag, but still a team player. With Dillon and his "attitude", it may screw with the chemistry. i dont know where every1 gets dillon having an "attitude" the man played like 5 years for the bengals never complained no matter how bad they were. the one time he complains is because he gets hurt and when he comes back he learns that he looses his starting role. i fail to see how being upset because he lost his job becomes a "attitude" problem
April 20, 200422 yr i dont know where every1 gets dillon having an "attitude" the man played like 5 years for the bengals never complained no matter how bad they were. the one time he complains is because he gets hurt and when he comes back he learns that he looses his starting role. i fail to see how being upset because he lost his job becomes a "attitude" problem Yeah, Dillon never complained. Ever. He never called his offensive linemen bums. He never said he'd flip burgers before he'd re-sign with the Bengals two months before he signed with them either. Dillion was NEVER a problem before this year. Get a clue. Corey today though: "I still have love for Cincinnati and the fans. I'd like to thank Mike Brown, Katie Blackburn, Troy Blackburn, Coach [Marvin] Lewis," Dillon said. "I had some great times there. I set a couple of records in Cincinnati. I'm always going to have love for Cincinnati and that fan base." My response: "(bleeped)"
April 20, 200422 yr I think this will make the Pats worse. Call me crazy. why? It would be like if the Marlins went and traded for some troublemaker. I can't think of anyone in particular, but I'm sure someone can fill in the blank here. What would be the point? The Pats don't need him, he might very well turn into a big problem. Oh, and what else? Oh yeah, he's not that good. He'll have 3 or 4 amazing games a year, and then pretty much suck in the rest of them. This is a slight exaggeration, but I swear it's not far off. He's VERY inconsistent. I'm in a pretty simple position to be able to say the Pats will be worse this year with Dillon, considering they've won like 15 in a row, and have nowhere to go but down, but still, that's how I feel. I think Dillon's poison, and I offer as evidence Cincinatti's ascension without him last year. They're may be a dozen other factors there, but I bet the team enjoyed the games more without him, and that made them win more.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.