I have a moral question for you.

 

This is an imaginary situation, but I think it is fun to decide what one would do.

 

The situation: You are in the Middle East, and there is a huge flood in progress. Many homes have been lost, water supplies compromised and structures destroyed. You are a photographer getting still photos for the CNN news service and are traveling alone, looking for particularly poignant scenes. You come across Osama Bin Laden who has been swept away by the floodwaters. He is barely hanging on to a tree limb and is about to go under.

 

You can either put down your camera and save him, or take a Pulitzer Prize winning photograph of him as he loses his grip on the limb. So, here's the question and think carefully before you answer the question below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Which lens, would you use ???

:lol

 

 

 

Classic

:lol

 

 

 

Classic

524959[/snapback]

:lol

That's 8 straight posts that involve :lol .

:lol

 

 

 

Classic

524959[/snapback]

:lol

That's 8 straight posts that involve :lol .

524987[/snapback]

I am sorry if that pisses you off. I have had a horrible day. I need a laugh and its a message board where I will post what I feel about it. Sorry if it offends you.

:lol

 

 

 

Classic

524959[/snapback]

:lol

That's 8 straight posts that involve :lol .

524987[/snapback]

I am sorry if that pisses you off. I have had a horrible day. I need a laugh and its a message board where I will post what I feel about it. Sorry if it offends you.

524988[/snapback]

I have no problem with it, I'm just worried you might have a :lol fetish.

How about save him, then kill him with my bare hands and take a picture of his dead cold body, then collect my millions from GW

I'll save him then drop him off at the nearest US Military base and collect my $50 million.

I'll save him then drop him off at the nearest US Military base and collect my $50 million.

525339[/snapback]

same here :lol