April 12, 200521 yr can't argue with that choice...although I would have given the NL to Xavier Nady over Pat Burrell
April 12, 200521 yr can't argue with that choice...although I would have given the NL to Xavier Nady over Pat Burrell 739321[/snapback] really?.... showin some more Bay Area bias? Pat Burrell .480/.518/.998/1.516 3 homers, 15rbi Xavier Nady .364/.440/.909/1.349 3 homers, 10rbi still think so?
April 12, 200521 yr can't argue with that choice...although I would have given the NL to Xavier Nady over Pat Burrell 739321[/snapback] really?.... showin some more Bay Area bias? Pat Burrell .480/.518/.998/1.516 3 homers, 15rbi Xavier Nady .364/.440/.909/1.349 3 homers, 10rbi still think so? 739334[/snapback] Burrell didn't have to play four of the six games at Petco Park
April 12, 200521 yr can't argue with that choice...although I would have given the NL to Xavier Nady over Pat Burrell 739321[/snapback] really?.... showin some more Bay Area bias? Pat Burrell .480/.518/.998/1.516 3 homers, 15rbi Xavier Nady .364/.440/.909/1.349 3 homers, 10rbi still think so? 739334[/snapback] Burrell didn't have to play four of the six games at Petco Park 739357[/snapback] :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol That is the best excuse I ever heard! Where did Nady hit two of his homeruns and get 4 of his RBIs. In Coors you say? Infact outside of Coors he had only 1 other game he had a hit in! Your homerism is so great! You haven't sucked on Barroid's syringe in a while, you were cuter when you did that.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.