December 29, 200520 yr Me either. I was listening to Hank yesterday and they were talking about the highs and lows of this past year in sports and a caller had called in about the Marlins to put them in the low of sports this year. Then Hank said he is a little reserved about a comment he wants to make about the Marlins (could be good/bad) but he needs to confirm it first. The way I understood it was that he was not going to list them as a low just yet. Something to do with David Samson is going to have a live meeting by the end of this week.
December 29, 200520 yr Me either. I was listening to Hank yesterday and they were talking about the highs and lows of this past year in sports and a caller had called in about the Marlins to put them in the low of sports this year. Then Hank said he is a little reserved about a comment he wants to make about the Marlins (could be good/bad) but he needs to confirm it first. The way I understood it was that he was not going to list them as a low just yet. Something to do with David Samson is going to have a live meeting by the end of this week. I joined in the middle but didn't he indicate that MLB was not happy with Marlins orginization pocketing the the $28 M in revenue sharing money and that MLB was invetigating them??
December 29, 200520 yr Me either. I was listening to Hank yesterday and they were talking about the highs and lows of this past year in sports and a caller had called in about the Marlins to put them in the low of sports this year. Then Hank said he is a little reserved about a comment he wants to make about the Marlins (could be good/bad) but he needs to confirm it first. The way I understood it was that he was not going to list them as a low just yet. Something to do with David Samson is going to have a live meeting by the end of this week. I joined in the middle but didn't he indicate that MLB was not happy with Marlins orginization pocketing the the $28 M in revenue sharing money and that MLB was invetigating them?? I wasn't listening yesterday and missed all this. Sounds like Hank is being cautious for a change. Anyone have more info?
December 29, 200520 yr Me either. I was listening to Hank yesterday and they were talking about the highs and lows of this past year in sports and a caller had called in about the Marlins to put them in the low of sports this year. Then Hank said he is a little reserved about a comment he wants to make about the Marlins (could be good/bad) but he needs to confirm it first. The way I understood it was that he was not going to list them as a low just yet. Something to do with David Samson is going to have a live meeting by the end of this week. I joined in the middle but didn't he indicate that MLB was not happy with Marlins orginization pocketing the the $28 M in revenue sharing money and that MLB was invetigating them?? I wasn't listening yesterday and missed all this. Sounds like Hank is being cautious for a change. Anyone have more info? hmm I missed it damn you work! Hmm interesting, could make sense they would be more then a little upset over it. I bet he is cautious because didnt he get suspended last time for comments about the fish?
December 29, 200520 yr Me either. I was listening to Hank yesterday and they were talking about the highs and lows of this past year in sports and a caller had called in about the Marlins to put them in the low of sports this year. Then Hank said he is a little reserved about a comment he wants to make about the Marlins (could be good/bad) but he needs to confirm it first. The way I understood it was that he was not going to list them as a low just yet. Something to do with David Samson is going to have a live meeting by the end of this week. I joined in the middle but didn't he indicate that MLB was not happy with Marlins orginization pocketing the the $28 M in revenue sharing money and that MLB was invetigating them?? I wasn't listening yesterday and missed all this. Sounds like Hank is being cautious for a change. Anyone have more info? hmm I missed it damn you work! Hmm interesting, could make sense they would be more then a little upset over it. I bet he is cautious because didnt he get suspended last time for comments about the fish? I think the last time he was suspended it was for his comments regarding the Loria divorce. Unless there was another suspension after that one...it's hard to keep up with Hank's suspensions.
December 30, 200520 yr I am searching for the transcripts on Hanks show. (if their is any) It occurred in the morning of 12-28-2005. He was very cautious not to say anything. He kept saying that he is awaiting for Samson speech before he would even comment himself.
December 30, 200520 yr Doesnt it seem like were always the last ones to hear anything? I guess thats just how it is, it sucks. Frankly Im done hearing anything on the issue unless it begins with "Marlins decide to stay in South Florida..." followed by the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ that is needed and then the stadium breaks ground(what a day that would be). until that happens or the other unspeakable scenarios play out im really done with the agravation and anxious feeling i get every time i hear some thing new, especially something negative.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.