August 27, 200620 yr The NL hasnt won an all-star game since the Reagan era. Since when has the NL not been "god-awful"? When they took the interlague season series in 2002 and 2003. Once you get past Boston and the Yankees, there's little difference between tha talent of the two leagues. Of course that will change if the White Sox, Blue Jays and Angels continue to throw money to keep up with the two Northeastern juggernauts.
August 27, 200620 yr The NL hasnt won an all-star game since the Reagan era. Since when has the NL not been "god-awful"? When they took the interlague season series in 2002 and 2003. Once you get past Boston and the Yankees, there's little difference between tha talent of the two leagues. Of course that will change if the White Sox, Blue Jays and Angels continue to throw money to keep up with the two Northeastern juggernauts. The AL wins the All Star game every year. The last NL team to win the WS? Marlins. The AL owns the NL. You can cast aside the Red Sox and Yanks but then whats the point??
August 27, 200620 yr I choose to believe in the reults of 130 games made up of real teams versus 1 exhibition. The top heavy league is not necessarily better than the other. The middle and bottom tiers of the other league may be much stronger. See ACC against Big East football in the 90s.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.