November 12, 200421 yr what did it in for Scott was finding the bodies exactly where he went fishing...both being 90 miles away from Modesto.
November 12, 200421 yr Did it really seem like he was gonna be found anything but guilty? 613496[/snapback] Actually it was an overwhelming amount of coincidence and circumstance. I think he is guilty but also think it may be overturned on some minor legal point.
November 12, 200421 yr Amazing that somebody can be convicted without a murder weapon or cause of death....
November 12, 200421 yr Amazing that somebody can be convicted without a murder weapon or cause of death.... 613532[/snapback] Circumstantial evidence puts a lot of people away.
November 12, 200421 yr It bugs me he was convicted of murdering the unborn son. Why can't we pick a side and stay with it?
November 12, 200421 yr Anybody who kills their wife and unborn son should die by being mauled by squirrels. :thumbdown
November 12, 200421 yr Anybody who kills their wife and unborn son should die by being mauled by squirrels. :thumbdown 613560[/snapback] I TOTALLY AGREE...well...maybe not about the squirrels :confused
November 13, 200421 yr Anybody who kills their wife and unborn son should die by being mauled by squirrels. :thumbdown 613560[/snapback] well dunno about the squirrels, but his inmates sure will..... :plain
November 13, 200421 yr I was pretty convinced that he did it. I'm just glad that the trial is now just about complete, and I won't have to hear about it anymore.
November 13, 200421 yr Anybody who kills their wife and unborn son should die by being mauled by squirrels.? :thumbdown 613560[/snapback] well dunno about the squirrels, but his inmates sure will..... :plain 613582[/snapback] :lol :lol
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.