Don't think I saw anyone else post about this...

 

Dodgers are removing the names from their jersey's to pay hommage to the '55 WS victory this season. I heard another team is doing that as well (forgot who).

Every team should do it on their home jerseys.

 

No names on jerseys pwn.

 

All of my replica Sox home jerseys dont have names on them unlike alot of fans who do.

I think it depends, but the Dodgers are the best looking team in all of baseball anyway.

I like the no names on jersey look.

No names is the way to go, especially for teams that were charter members of the American & National League

I think I mentioned something about this in a thread where I highlighted uni changes for 2005.

 

I can't remember the other team that did it either.

Fine, I'll break the trend and express my happiness with names on jerseys. Yes, the Yankees and Red Sox (and Giants) all look great with no names on the back, but a lot of jerseys (especially the Tigers' very plain home jersey) look better with names on the back. I mean, how sharp are the black and silver Marlins jerseys?

Only some teams can rock the no name approach on the home unis. The Dodgers are for sure one of them, but someone like the Marlins wouldn't look too good like that.

The Dodgers are just envious of the Giants.

The Dodgers are just envious of the Giants.

728510[/snapback]

 

 

Or maybe it's the Giants of the Dodgers? :mischief

 

Both got very nice unis but the Dodgers have the edge in this contest.

Only some teams can rock the no name approach on the home unis. The Dodgers are for sure one of them, but someone like the Marlins wouldn't look too good like that.

728362[/snapback]

Marlins shouldn't. They were founded 10 years ago or so. I think the old teams should go nameless. Of course, using that same line of thinking, one could argue they shouldn't even wear numbers but I think that's going a little too far.