Jump to content


Washington Times article on relocation options


fanfish
 Share

Recommended Posts

Other cities wait on baseball

By Tim Lemke

THE WASHINGTON TIMES

December 30, 2005

 

 

Three major U.S. cities recently renewed their efforts to land a major league baseball team, providing new venues where Major League Baseball could move the Washington Nationals if the D.C. Council fails to approve a lease agreement for a new stadium in the District.

However, officials from Las Vegas, San Antonio and Portland said they remain focused on luring the Florida Marlins, who are seeking to leave their Miami home. And industry sources said the ballpark plans in those cities are too half-baked to convince MLB officials to leave the District just yet.

"There is no debate of two facts: that Major League Baseball wants to be in D.C., and there are at least three places where the Nationals can be relocated," said Marc Ganis, president of SportsCorp Ltd., a Chicago company that has consulted on the relocation of sports teams. "But no one should be thinking about the Nationals right now because it is Washington's team."

For the Nationals to remain in the District for the long-term, the D.C. Council must approve a lease agreement for a ballpark, to be located along South Capitol Street near the Anacostia River. A majority of the 13-member council is needed to approve the lease. A vote had been scheduled for Dec. 20 but was postponed because of lack of support.

After tomorrow, MLB could pursue arbitration, but city officials said they are continuing to talk with the league about changes to the lease that would satisfy council members. The council is expected to vote in mid-January, but if the lease is shot down, some ballpark supporters said MLB could move the team.

"It's a big unknown, but we absolutely believe it's a possibility," said Vince Morris, a spokesman for Mayor Anthony A. Williams. "If Major League Baseball were sentimental, they never would have left Washington in the first place. We don't want to find out the hard way."

Officials in Las Vegas, San Antonio and Portland have had informal discussions with Marlins executives about relocating but have not talked with MLB regarding the Nationals. One thing working in the District's favor is that none of the cities is willing to pay for the full cost of a stadium, as the District agreed to do last year. By luring the Marlins instead, the team would likely be able to convince the team owners to pay for part of the project.

On the other hand, MLB, which owns the Nationals, so far has been unwilling to contribute heavily to ballpark construction, agreeing to commit $20 million toward the Nationals' stadium only after a tense four-month negotiation over the lease.

"We are not going to fully publicly finance a stadium," said Christian Archer, a special assistant to San Antonio Mayor Phil Hardberger. "That's not on the table here. Everyone knows what the tab is, and it's substantial."

Industry sources said Las Vegas may have the strongest chance of landing a team because it is one of the fastest-growing cities in the nation and mayor Oscar Goodman is a wild baseball supporter. But financing plans are still under discussion, and support from residents and casino operators has been mixed.

Portland does have in place a bill, passed in 2003, that would use an estimated $150 million in income taxes from players and team officials toward ballpark construction. But city support for baseball has softened in the last year. New mayor Tom Potter has said baseball should not be a priority, and it is unclear whether governor Ted Kulongoski would support a stadium plan because he is seeking re-election.

Ballpark opponents in the District have been concerned about the cost of the stadium, which has risen to $667 million. The city is authorized to borrow only $535 million for the project but is responsible for all cost overruns. Most council members said they would support the lease if those extra costs could be funded by outside money.

"I don't see baseball backing out," said Kwame Brown, at-large Democrat. "Why would they leave in a market that's flourishing and that wants them? I think we'll come up with something that's a win-win situation."

League officials did not return phone calls and e-mails requesting comment. In correspondence with council members, officials have threatened to take the city to arbitration but have not explicitly mentioned relocation as an option.

"The bottom line is that the team is in Washington," said another industry source with knowledge of baseball's relocation process. "Baseball does not have any real alternative" but to stay.

Northern Virginia also was strongly considered to land the team last year, but the area's bid fell short after the state decided against using public funds for a stadium. Members of the Virginia Baseball Club, which led the effort, are now part of a group bidding to own the Nationals in the District. Norfolk also was a relocation option last year, but their efforts are not as organized as other cities, and officials in Charlotte, N.C. -- another city contacted by the Marlins -- said getting public money for the stadium would be difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Much of Norfolk's appeal was its TV access to North Carolina and Virginia, which has been snapped up by the creation of the Mid-Atlantic Sports Network between the Nationals and Orioles.

 

Same thing killed Buffalo / Rochester's chances in the 90s when the Yankees and Mets took over their TV markets.

 

Portland, which is part of the Mariners' vast TV market, but also independent in their viewership has a chance. San Antonio maybe could become its own market seperate from the two Texas squads.

 

Down the line, I see Albuquerque becoming a serious candidate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems the Marlins and MLB really don't have better alternatives than South Florida. The Marlins have taken the wrong approach and instead of working to establish strong connections within the community and local governments they're playing the game of brinkmanship and alienating themselves. I suppose we'll see soon enough whether their approach will work. Otherwise as fans we may be looking at low-budget payrolls for quite awhile.

 

MLB is expecting DC to fully pay for the stadium and then agree to favorable lease terms. That is a significantly better deal than the Marlins have been offered if it happens.

 

The Marlins have not really offered to put much cash up front, but are willing to pay for all cost overruns. Other cities expect the Marlins to contribute a significant amount of money as well. So the Marlins may threaten to relocate, but it appears from these reports they'll have just as difficult a time coming to an agreement with San Antonio, Portland or Las Vegas as they are having with Miami.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not any better than South Florida, but some of these towns certainly offer better deals than they have at JRS/PPS/DS.

especially when you factor in that a roofed stadium is not a requirement on most target locations, and land cost may be considerably lower.

Yeah, I shouldn't have made it seem like they are willing to take any offer. Of course they want one that makes sense long-term as well in the short term. Although I feel you're dealing with a lot of the same issues whether it be here or elsewhere. Cautious politicians and funding issues, apathetic population with pre-existing loyalties and contested locations of the project.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems the Marlins and MLB really don't have better alternatives than South Florida. The Marlins have taken the wrong approach and instead of working to establish strong connections within the community and local governments they're playing the game of brinkmanship and alienating themselves. I suppose we'll see soon enough whether their approach will work. Otherwise as fans we may be looking at low-budget payrolls for quite awhile.

 

MLB is expecting DC to fully pay for the stadium and then agree to favorable lease terms. That is a significantly better deal than the Marlins have been offered if it happens.

 

The Marlins have not really offered to put much cash up front, but are willing to pay for all cost overruns. Other cities expect the Marlins to contribute a significant amount of money as well. So the Marlins may threaten to relocate, but it appears from these reports they'll have just as difficult a time coming to an agreement with San Antonio, Portland or Las Vegas as they are having with Miami.

 

 

I do not believe the media gets the stadium deal - either that or they are miscommunicating it completely. The whole deal that was almost agreed upon last year - DOES NOT GIVE THE OWNERSHIP THE STADIUM - the City of Miami/Miami Dade County would have owned the stadium. The media kept pushing the idea that giving owners a free playground is wrong. That was not the deal that was in place - it was a partnership between the local government and the ownership - afterall the ownership is putting up $192m of its own money which would have come mainly in the form of lease payments on the stadium.

 

Last year the sales tax rebate - which also was not communicated very well in the media - was almost a done deal - according to the mayor Carlos Alvarez' camp - all it needed was a nudge of support from the Senate - our dade county state representation did nothing to voice the need for the stadium and therefore the rebate is killed. To explain the rebate - simply the money that is spent on construction, materials, etc all the sales tax is rebated or not paid to the State for x number of years to a tune of $2m per year (think it summed to $30m). The point was not made that without the rebate the money would not be spent in FL anyways - at least it is a revenue stream for the state of Florida and for the dade county.

 

Whatever happened to the money earmarked for stadiums and the like from the Dade County Bed Tax - that money is already sitting there and just needs a push to allocate to the stadium. We as citizens of the S. Florida area need to have our voices heard - do not allow the media and politicians kill baseball in S. Florida.

 

Citizens to Save Baseball in S. Florida is a step in the right direction to give the fans a voice that WILL BE HEARD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...