Jump to content

Al Qaeda at pre-9/11 strength


Recommended Posts

WASHINGTON ? A new threat assessment from U.S. counterterrorism analysts says that Al Qaeda has used its haven along the Afghan-Pakistan border to restore its operating capabilities to a level unseen since the months before Sept. 11, 2001.

 

A counterterrorism official familiar with a five-page summary of the document ? titled "Al Qaeda better positioned to strike the West" ? called it a stark appraisal. The analysis will be part of a broader meeting at the White House on Thursday about an upcoming National Intelligence Estimate.

 

The official and others spoke to the Associated Press on condition they not be identified because the report remains classified.

 

The findings suggest that the network that launched the most devastating terror attack on U.S. soil has been able to regroup despite nearly six years of bombings, war and other tactics aimed at dismantling it.

 

The threat assessment focuses on the terror group's haven in Pakistan and makes a range of observations about the threat posed to the United States and its allies, officials said.

 

Counterterrorism officials have been increasingly concerned about Al Qaeda's recent operations. This week, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said he had a "gut feeling" that the United States faced a heightened risk of attack this summer.

 

Still, numerous government officials say they know of no specific, credible threat of a new attack on U.S. soil.

 

And Chertoff repeated that Thursday during appearances on morning television news shows. But in an interview on NBC's "Today" show, he also said officials believe "we're entering a period" of increased risk.

 

Asked on ABC's "Good Morning America" to explain Al Qaeda's continuing strength nearly six years after the Sept. 11 attacks in the United States, Chertoff said, "It reflects the fact that just as we improve our defenses, the enemy tries to improve its defenses and rebuild itself."

 

Al Qaeda is "considerably operationally stronger than a year ago" and has "regrouped to an extent not seen since 2001," the counterterrorism official said, paraphrasing the report's conclusions. "They are showing greater and greater ability to plan attacks in Europe and the United States."

 

The group also has created "the most robust training program since 2001, with an interest in using European operatives," the official quoted the report as saying.

 

At the same time, this official said, the report speaks of "significant gaps in intelligence" so U.S. authorities may be ignorant of potential or planned attacks.

 

John Kringen, who heads the CIA's analysis directorate, echoed the concerns about Al Qaeda's resurgence during testimony and conversations with reporters at a House Armed Services Committee hearing on Wednesday.

 

"They seem to be fairly well settled into the safe haven and the ungoverned spaces of Pakistan," Kringen testified. "We see more training. We see more money. We see more communications. We see that activity rising."

 

The threat assessment comes as the 16 U.S. intelligence agencies prepare a National Intelligence Estimate focusing on threats to the United States. A senior intelligence official, who spoke on condition of anonymity while the high-level analysis was being completed, said the document has been in the works for roughly two years.

 

Kringen and aides to National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell would not comment on the details of that analysis.

 

"Preparation of the estimate is not a response to any specific threat," McConnell's spokesman Ross Feinstein said, adding that it probably will be ready for distribution this summer.

 

Kringen said he wouldn't attach a summer time frame to the concern. In studying the threat, he said he begins with the premise that Al Qaeda would consider attacking the United States a "home run hit" and that the easiest way to get into the United States would be through Europe.

 

Several European countries ? among them Britain, Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands ? are highlighted in the threat assessment partly because they have arrangements with the Pakistani government that allow their citizens easier access to Pakistan than others, according to the counterterrorism official.

 

This is more troubling because all four are part of the U.S. visa waiver program, and their citizens can enter the United States without additional security scrutiny, the official said.

 

The Bush administration has repeatedly cited Al Qaeda as a key justification for continuing the fight in Iraq.

 

"The No. 1 enemy in Iraq is Al Qaeda," White House press secretary Tony Snow said Wednesday. "Al Qaeda continues to be the chief organizer of mayhem within Iraq."

 

The findings could bolster the president's hand at a moment when support on Capitol Hill for the war is eroding and the administration is struggling to defend its decision for a military buildup in Iraq.

 

The threat assessment says that Al Qaeda stepped up efforts to "improve its core operational capability" in late 2004 but did not succeed until December 2006 after the Pakistani government signed a peace agreement with tribal leaders that effectively removed government military presence from the northwest frontier with Afghanistan.

 

The agreement allows Taliban and Al Qaeda operatives to move across the border with impunity and establish and run training centers, the report says, according to the official.

 

It also says that Al Qaeda is particularly interested in building up the numbers in its middle ranks, or operational positions, so there is not as great a lag in attacks when such people are killed.

 

"Being No. 3 in Al Qaeda is a bad job. We regularly get to the No. 3 person," Tom Fingar, the top U.S. intelligence analyst, told the House panel.

 

The report also notes that Al Qaeda has increased its public statements, although analysts stressed that those video and audio messages aren't reliable indicators of the actions the group may take

 

Associated Press Writer Deb Riechmann contributed to this report.

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article...712008/0/NEWS05

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a major and terrible consequence of this Iraq war. While we are bogged down in Iraq spending billions trying to get the Sunnis and Shiites to not kill each other, AQ has used our presence their to convince recruits to join them, has operated freely in Pakistan, and now puts us in the same position we were pre-9-11.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a major and terrible consequence of this Iraq war. While we are bogged down in Iraq spending billions trying to get the Sunnis and Shiites to not kill each other, AQ has used our presence their to convince recruits to join them, has operated freely in Pakistan, and now puts us in the same position we were pre-9-11.

if you didnt see this coming then you(not you) are an idiot...actually...i take that back...if you didnt see all of Bush's presidency coming, then you are a moron and any voting privelage you had should be revoked

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a major and terrible consequence of this Iraq war. While we are bogged down in Iraq spending billions trying to get the Sunnis and Shiites to not kill each other, AQ has used our presence their to convince recruits to join them, has operated freely in Pakistan, and now puts us in the same position we were pre-9-11.

 

There is likely some correlation in using iraq as a recruiting chip, but the real problem here is obedience of internaitonal law and the weakness of the pakistani government to moving against al-qaeda on the border. U.S. can't invade pakistans sovereignty without their permission, which they wont give bc it a precarious political decision to make to allow U.S. troops into ur borders.

 

Even without iraq this definitely would have happened, perhaps slower, but it would have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a major and terrible consequence of this Iraq war. While we are bogged down in Iraq spending billions trying to get the Sunnis and Shiites to not kill each other, AQ has used our presence their to convince recruits to join them, has operated freely in Pakistan, and now puts us in the same position we were pre-9-11.

 

There is likely some correlation in using iraq as a recruiting chip, but the real problem here is obedience of internaitonal law and the weakness of the pakistani government to moving against al-qaeda on the border. U.S. can't invade pakistans sovereignty without their permission, which they wont give bc it a precarious political decision to make to allow U.S. troops into ur borders.

 

Even without iraq this definitely would have happened, perhaps slower, but it would have.

 

I really disagree. Their cooperation with us post 9/11 has dropped off quite a bit. A lot of that has to do with the knowledge that we are limited in what we can do because of Iraq.

 

To say that this was inevitable is almost to say there is nothing we can do to stop it. The re-rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, who Pakistan was a staunch supporter of pre-9/11, is definitely something we could have stopped. I don't think that cozy relationship ceased to exist because of 9/11 either.

 

An outright invasion or bombing is not the only way to get to these guys. There are ways that won't undermine Pakistan's sovereignty.

 

And besides, aren't we supposed to be aggressive in defeating threats that have developed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a huge problem was the redirection of major resources from Afghanistan to Iraq right before the invasion of that country. Our commitment to Afghanistan and that first nation-building attempt has been at least half-hearted since the spring of 2003. This is what happens when you start vendetta wars, as well. The real threats get a chance to regroup and rebuild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...