Everything posted by ultxmxpx
-
Reaction of Europeans to Bush's Win
No, I doubt they would "complain" if Kerry or Nader was elected. At least not as much as they are now.
-
Evangelicals lead charge for GOP
It was the tightest victory for an incombent president since 1916 with Woodrow Wilson. In 1916 he won 49-46% and 277-254 electoral votes. Compared to this election, 51-48 and 286-252.
-
When will the dems be back in power?
They think minorities can't compete, because a significant, if not a majority, of whites are racist, not because they think they're dumb.
-
Best Republican in 2008?
Apparently you havent followed Powell through the years. I like powell to some extent but the 'powell is a democrat' accusation has little to do with not agreeing with the bush admin., its always been known that hes liberal on several issues, which is why many dems like him 610673[/snapback] Yea, I suppose I haven't followed Powell through the years. Could you inform me on some of the issues he's been "liberal" on? You can be liberal on some issues and still be a republican, especially the more social issues. Or at the most it doesn't necessarily make you a democrat.
-
Interpol
I like Interpol. I listened to Antics a couple times when it was on MTV's the leak. It was pretty good, it seems like it would get better the more I listened to it.
-
Sunday Night TV
Only a week late. It's so ridiculous that they don't show the Simpsons Halloween episode until after Halloween. And for it to be a week after Halloween makes it even more ridiculous. Dam World Series.
-
Undress the ladiis by catching beer bottles!
There needs to be more internet games like that.
-
Prepare for heavy casualties in Fooljah
Anyone find it weird that they finally did this attack just a few days after the election?
-
Best Republican in 2008?
John McCain is 68, so he'd be 72 in 2008 and 80 in 2016, so I doubt the nominate. Too bad though. I like him, out of all the others in that poll. I like Schwarzenegger, but who knows if they'd change the rules for him. I think it's stupid to call Colin Powell a democrat. Just because he "secretly" opposes what the Bush administration has done, that makes makes him the opposite of a republican? The democrats did the same with Wesley Clark during the primaries, calling him a republican, because he pointed out flaws in (or you could say attacked) other democrats. There can't be any opposition within a party?