Lcyberlina

Now Al Qaeda has a new commander there, who has organized the resistance into a more formidable fighting operation. He was there before the war. 585139[/snapback] That's an absolute lie.

And what was Bush's major experience when he got elected? No better or worse than Edwards. Why cant Edwards lean on the "Ill have advisors" excuse? Before anyone tries...no need to say "I knew George Bush, I worked with George Bush etc." 585134[/snapback] W had executive experience as Gov and in private sector. Edwards has yet to dabble in anything resembling a position requiring an executive mindset. 585141[/snapback] Executive experience? Don't get me started. He has experience getting help from Daddy to start up a company, which subsequently he bankrupted. Let's not even talk about the fact that he can't make a sound management decision... After all he claims his "biggest" mistake was trading Sammy Sosa. :whistle Let's not even talk about what he did as governor.

Anyone pick up on John Edwards' mistake of how much the war is costing us? He said it was costing us $200 Billion dollars. http://costofwar.com/ 584809[/snapback] That number is what politicians do. Its plausible. Bush and Cheney stretch a lot to. Goodness.. 585111[/snapback] 200 Billion is what Bush asked and got from congress. Whether they have spent it all or not is not the issue. They have it there ready for Halliburton.

...when we went into the first Gulf war where there were 130,000 arab troops on the ground. That is f***ing coalition. Don't give me crap. 584388[/snapback] Your math is no good. BAHRAIN 400 (support) EGYPT 40,000 KUWAIT 11,000 OMAN 25,500 SAUDI 118,000 SYRIA 17,000 UAE 40,000 Your ideal coalition pals: FRANCE 18,000 troops GERMANY 0 ground troops (they sent a wing of bombers though) If we couldn't get anything of significance out of FR/DE in Desert Storm, what makes you think Kerry can get them onboard now? Explain. 584900[/snapback] Notice how I said Arab countries. They were the ones must affected by Saddam's invasion of Kwait. What is your point.

i found it funny when edwards said that he was for preventive attacks but was against the war in iraq because iraq hadn't attacked us. 584513[/snapback] That is why you miss the point and you always will. They didn't attack us and they never were going to... With what? "spitballs!" :mischief

Hmmm...Maybe not. But here's where your original post fits in: prop?a?gan?da? Misleading material disseminated by the advocates or opponents of a doctrine or cause. :thumbup 584505[/snapback] It would be propaganda if I had label it "Doomsday scenario" this is what will happen when Bush gets elected. Listen, you are acting like an ass. You want to attack me for making fun of our own stupid fears go right ahead.

Ahy Dios Mio! CF. Iraq wasn't even close to be the center of the war on terror. I hope you are not confusing Afghanistan with Iraq; in case you didn't know they are two separate countries. One (Afghanistan) was where Osama Bin Laden was being harboured and trained his army of terrorists. The other one (Iraq) was Saddam Husseins country. For the last time: Saddam had no connections with Al-Qaeda Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11 (NOTHING!) Saddam had no relationship WHATSOEVER with any terrorists planning to attack Americans. Now, you could argue all day of the terrorists organizations that Saddam gave money to (Hamas), but none of these organizations had anything to do with Al-Qaeda's attack against America. Period. If you were looking to attack countries who aid Hamas or Hezbollah, then you need to look at Iran, Syria, Lybia and SAUDI ARABIA.

OK you just confused me. I know most of us hear agree that Cheney bested Edwards last night. Are you implying otherwise? 584434[/snapback] No. He really did well in presenting his lies forcefully, but we all know that online polls can be easily rigged. This is the reason why I don't believe the same poll on the VP debate where Edwards is up 74% is true.

Funny, how everyone loves to cite France. The favorite one to hate. Just remember that we would still be a colony of Brittain if it wasn't for the help of the French... Just a little perspective for the French bashing idiot. 584388[/snapback] Whoa, you don't want to debate this. 584416[/snapback] Why not? Feel like re-writing history today? This is what amazes me, you are so quick to rename your fries, but you are quick to forget why this nation is free today.

Worng. It was a satirical response to your original post that attempted satire. 584413[/snapback] Definition of satire: Literary work that uses biting wit, irony or sarcasm to expose vice or folly. I don't think your remarks fit the description of literary work. :thumbup

Anyone that pays attention to the world around them should be able to tell? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? that Cheney was full of Sh*t last night and Edwards was the one who really came across truthfully... But since the average, American person is easily swayed and will believe Cheneys "remarks" were adequate and/or superior to Edwards' 584312[/snapback] You checked the polls? Even the FOXNews polls? To quote Cheney "Your facts are just wrong" 584411[/snapback] Then the polls mean that there are a lot of duped people online :thumbup :lol

OK...Here's one: If Kerry wins we all get a million dollars If Bush wins we all die a painful, prolonged death and then languish in hell for eternity. 584387[/snapback] Those are jokes. Not satires. :thumbup

Yeah... Let's see. Brittain,... :mischief2 Brittain.... :mischief2 Oh that's right Poland!, he forgot Poland! Please! Get a grip! As if Bush knew what "allies" really meant. 582951[/snapback] Absurd that you believe this is all personal. Ignorant to beleive that if Kery is in office that all of our allies and the UN will magically havea change of heart and bow at the feet of almighty Kerry and his international agenda. For example, Chirac announced last week that he wouldn't send any frogs into Iraq or anywhee else in the middle east, regardless of who is in office next year. 584356[/snapback] Personal? No. Serious, yes. A grand coaliation is the one we had when we went into the first Gulf war where there were 130,000 arab troops on the ground. That is f***ing coalition. Don't give me crap. Funny, how everyone loves to cite France. The favorite one to hate. Just remember that we would still be a colony of Brittain if it wasn't for the help of the French... Just a little perspective for the French bashing idiot. Whether Kerry can convince Chirac that it is in his best interest to not have a failed Iraq is debatable. However, Bush doesn't even have the leverage or credibility to even try. Kerry would be a fresh start and they might be more open to listen to him. Will he be successful, we don't know, but we have to try, because as we stand right now with Bush in power, that possibility is nule. Can you tell me what is Bush's exit strategy?

Shouldn't this be in the political jokes thread? I mean, this is some type of attempt at satire, isn't it? 584349[/snapback] I would... But it is not a joke or a cartoon. It is a satire piece.

what they saw each other a couple of times and say good morning, maybe shook hands. that's the equivalent of never meeting you to me. if i can't remember if i have met you before or not, then i've never met you. 584295[/snapback] weak 584297[/snapback] but it's the truth. i'm sorry, there's a guy who goes to class with me and we never talk, maybe i've said hi to him twice. if you ask me, i've never met him. trying to bring that up as a lie is reaching. democrats were desperate for anything to cover up what is a horrendous record in public service. 584301[/snapback] You remember him don't you? If you saw him on the street you wouldn't say "I never saw you before in my life"... that is just a weak defense I'm sorry. Besides, this isn't just a small omission, it is a plain lie, since d*** Cheney sat next to Edwards in the prayer service breakfast... I think they rushed into putting that line in there without considering the fact that he may be rebutted easily with archived footage. It was stupid on the part of Cheney. 584318[/snapback] what is stupid is to put any weight on that when the real issue is mr. edwards not going to the senate meetings. 584332[/snapback] Well, that is the problem Orisha. It isn't true. Senator Edwards' record does speak for itself and so does Cheney's. If you compare them for all the years Cheney spent on the senate, Edwards has accomplished much more than he did. I suggest you go to Congress.org and see for yourself.

what they saw each other a couple of times and say good morning, maybe shook hands. that's the equivalent of never meeting you to me. if i can't remember if i have met you before or not, then i've never met you. 584295[/snapback] weak 584297[/snapback] but it's the truth. i'm sorry, there's a guy who goes to class with me and we never talk, maybe i've said hi to him twice. if you ask me, i've never met him. trying to bring that up as a lie is reaching. democrats were desperate for anything to cover up what is a horrendous record in public service. 584301[/snapback] You remember him don't you? If you saw him on the street you wouldn't say "I never saw you before in my life"... that is just a weak defense I'm sorry. Besides, this isn't just a small omission, it is a plain lie, since d*** Cheney sat next to Edwards in the prayer service breakfast... I think they rushed into putting that line in there without considering the fact that he may be rebutted easily with archived footage. It was stupid on the part of Cheney.

what they saw each other a couple of times and say good morning, maybe shook hands. that's the equivalent of never meeting you to me. if i can't remember if i have met you before or not, then i've never met you. 584295[/snapback] weak

holy s***..it goes to georgesoros.com and why we should not reelect Bush. :lol :lol 584214[/snapback] Isn't that hilarious though? Cheney must be like f*** off! :fyou

yeah, the domain was parked and for sale last night during the debate. i see somebody went and bought it since then. :lol 584195[/snapback] Really? Wow, George is on the ball! :lol

wow Cheney can't go an hour without lying

:lol He said "go to Factcheck.com" Do it and you know why I am on the floor. :lol :lol

smirkingchimp.com? now that's credibility! 582892[/snapback] Bingo....... And yes I did read this very "unbiased" piece...... 583429[/snapback] What you fail to realize is that the writer of this article is from the future, m00k. :mischief 583514[/snapback] Thank you... It is a "satire". Does anyone know what that is? If you guys can take something light then I can give credit to Michael Moore for correctly stating that Republicans are not funny, they have no sense of humor. :thumbdown

Woohoo... Sort of like "Dead Poet's Society"? :mischief2 I wish I had more time to read. I have a pile of unread books on my library. All the whistle blower books, progressive liberal books and a couple of history and fiction books. So much to read so little time. :confused I will try to pick the book suggested for the month though. This sounds like a cool thing to do Shammy. I'm glad you thought about it.

Cheney is the evil mastermind behind it all. I think when people compare him to Darth Vader they are totally wrong, he is Darth Sidious the evil emperor. The dark figure behind it all and the one who never shows his face. Edwards although outmatched by Dr. Evil, he managed to inflict a couple of wounds and I would say that it will eventually do more damage to Bush/Cheney, even though he won the debate, the battle is far from over. :thumbup

The socialized medicine (emulate Canada) crowd I was referring to this quote. This is the latest attack on Kerry's health care plan: "It is socialized medicine" "Government Run". etc.