August 24, 200421 yr Well it wasn't enough that you can't see your president unless you've been screened and identified as a supporter but now a man who was given a ticket to a bush rally by his boss showed up and had the "gall" to ask Bush a non fluff question. The man was fired for asking his elected official a question that wasn't easy enough for our president. Some country this is turning into.
August 24, 200421 yr You act like Kerry rallys arent pre screened as to who is going to ask questions and what questions are going to be asked...Im not saying its right or wrong to pre screen people for political rallys but dont act like Kerry doesnt do the same exact thing
August 24, 200421 yr Author You act like Kerry rallys arent pre screened as to who is going to ask questions and what questions are going to be asked...Im not saying its right or wrong to pre screen people for political rallys but dont act like Kerry doesnt do the same exact thing 524127[/snapback] He's debated with many bush supporters at his rally, I had a lot of republican friends who got into his rally here without ever going through a screening process. All you had to do was show up at The Democratic Offices here and get your ticket no screening involved.
August 24, 200421 yr Kerry actually addresses hecklers or allows them to stay. Somehow hecklers get in. I dont think any of them have every been fired from their jobs.
August 24, 200421 yr So its Bush's fault that the man got fired? Also, Phlub a big Kerry-Edwards supporter was able to get into a Bush rally up in Wisconsin supposedly along with a bunch of other Democrats so its certainly not impossible. Like they say though freedom of speech is a two way street.
August 24, 200421 yr Author So its Bush's fault that the man got fired? When was that ever said? Also, Phlub a big Kerry-Edwards supporter was able to get into a Bush rally up in Wisconsin supposedly along with a bunch of other Democrats so its certainly not impossible. Like they say though freedom of speech is a two way street. 524182[/snapback] I believe he said he was standing outside.
August 24, 200421 yr Also, Phlub a big Kerry-Edwards supporter was able to get into a Bush rally up in Wisconsin supposedly along with a bunch of other Democrats so its certainly not impossible. Like they say though freedom of speech is a two way street. 524182[/snapback] I believe he said he was standing outside. 524186[/snapback] And then 55 Kerry supporters (including myself) will be inside the rally with buttons on for sure and hopefully signs. So a little over 1/6 of the people INSIDE the rally will be Kerry supporters. So much for no liberals getting into Bush rallies
August 24, 200421 yr tired of fluff answers? vote third party. come on, whoever comes out and gives you straight up answers like this: http://www.badnarik.org/Issues/ http://www.badnarik.org/Why/
August 24, 200421 yr tired of fluff answers? vote third party. come on, whoever comes out and gives you straight up answers like this: http://www.badnarik.org/Issues/ http://www.badnarik.org/Why/ 524271[/snapback] Defintely a good candidate, but I have not even considered voting for him, because thats the equivalent of a wasted vote. (in florida) Florida will go to either kerry or bush and i'll do what i can to encourage people to not vote for kerry
August 24, 200421 yr kerry or bush...vote kerry 524482[/snapback] Yea right no way in hell. Bush may have been abig spender but he has pressure from within the party to cut down on spending come second term, whereas a liberal democrat is expected to maintain spending, instea dof wasting money o nwars they'll waste it on entitlements and useless public programs
August 24, 200421 yr tired of fluff answers? vote third party. come on, whoever comes out and gives you straight up answers like this: http://www.badnarik.org/Issues/ http://www.badnarik.org/Why/ 524271[/snapback] i myself am a libertarian, and agree with the majority of the points made by the libertarian party, but the truth is, votes go like this: A vote for Kerry/Edwards is a vote for Kerry/Edwards A vote for Bush/Cheney is a vote for Bush/Cheney A vote for ANYONE ELSE is a vote for Bush/Cheney
August 24, 200421 yr tired of fluff answers? vote third party. come on, whoever comes out and gives you straight up answers like this: http://www.badnarik.org/Issues/ http://www.badnarik.org/Why/ 524271[/snapback] i myself am a libertarian, and agree with the majority of the points made by the libertarian party, but the truth is, votes go like this: A vote for Kerry/Edwards is a vote for Kerry/Edwards A vote for Bush/Cheney is a vote for Bush/Cheney A vote for ANYONE ELSE is a vote for Bush/Cheney 524608[/snapback] I dont know if I agree with that. I vote for green party is defintely a vote for bush but a vote for badnarik i believe is a vote for kerry/edwards. most of the libertarians i know except for sorianofan lean more towards bush than kerry.
August 24, 200421 yr All i know is I am voteing for Ralph Nater!!!! J/K 524296[/snapback] Haha I find that funny you spelled Nader wrong. Why the hell was this guy fired? Bush obviously has the comprehension of a kindergartner, if he can't answer a question about the country he is running.
August 24, 200421 yr kerry or bush...vote kerry 524482[/snapback] Yea right no way in hell. Bush may have been abig spender but he has pressure from within the party to cut down on spending come second term, whereas a liberal democrat is expected to maintain spending, instea dof wasting money o nwars they'll waste it on entitlements and useless public programs 524489[/snapback] whoa, whoa, whoa...how can you be so sure of that? Bush is gonna have more wealthy tax cuts and the neocons wont allow cuts in military spending so it seems to me that wont change. Yeah the economy might alter the deficit but it doesnt change what bothers sorianofan.
August 24, 200421 yr republican dominance of all branches of government is unacceptable. they had 4 years to prove me something and they failed. the military is far too large and we need some political rivalry going before they start making a cabinet position for every aspect of the ominous threat of "terrorism." if you are not voting in a battleground state, vote third party, preferably libertarian, because almost every other party in america is either socialist or communist. if you are in a battleground state a vote for bush is a vote for increased deficit and bureaucracy. it is a vote for an administration that has openly lied to us. don't like the "L" word? They most definitely mised us. It is unacceptable. vote kerry.
August 24, 200421 yr Author Kerry's a PROVABLE liar too, not much difference.? Christmas in Cambodia - yea right. 525058[/snapback] So in your mind that's the same as sending kids to war and wasting tax payer's dollars with that war based on a lie?
August 25, 200421 yr Kerry's a PROVABLE liar too, not much difference. Christmas in Cambodia - yea right. 525058[/snapback] you find me a single veteran of a war that hasn't made up war stories...just one bush didn't even fight, how is there any controversy? and if i lie to you about something trivial, like ricky martin being gay, would you hold me equally accountable to some guy that is wasting hundreds of billions of dollars and thousands upon thousands of lives?? thats stupid
August 25, 200421 yr wasnt it fishfillet that pointed out teh ambigiuity of the borders? Plus youve indicted Kerry's entire war record as an embellishment for something he said how long ago tonyi? A better card game analogy might be you finding a card on the floor and declaring the whole thing a sham. And coping out with the bad intelligence argument doesnt absolve Bush. Im just not buying the woe is me argument.
August 25, 200421 yr bush didn't even fight, how is there any controversy? 525074[/snapback] 7 non-combat deaths of F-102 pilots during the Bush service period may not have been "fighting" by your standards, but it certainly indicates the level of risk involved in the job. Certainly more risky than driving a desk or hanging around in a garrison. The cold war was anything but cold - a lot of people died on both sides maintaing the charade. Do you think we shouldn't have sent anyone up to intercept the Sov Bear's that roamed the coastline? Is the deaths of those pilots somehow "less galant" than ones who died in hot combat situations? 525530[/snapback] where was Bush on that waiting list to get into the national guard?
August 25, 200421 yr I've indicated no such thing. Quote please. Indict, not indicate. But here: Christmas in Cambodia - yea right. The main difference of course is that Kerry appears to have embellished his war record to promote personal advancment
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.