October 16, 200422 yr "I'd say if you live in the United States of America and you vote for George Bush, you've lost your mind." -John Edwards on ABC's Nightline. What a moron, he sure does have some explaining to do considering members of the U.S. military and their families prefer Bush 4-1 over Kerry, so according to Edwards 75% of our military has lost their minds .
October 16, 200422 yr "I'd say if you live in the United States of America and you vote for George Bush, you've lost your mind." -John Edwards from ABC'S Nightline. http://www.washingtondispatch.com/page2/archives/000629.html What a moron, he sure does have some explaining to do considering members of the U.S. military and their families prefer Bush 4-1 over Kerry, so according to Edwards 75% of our military has lost their minds . 593479[/snapback] The military always supports the commander in chief Accord. Even in Vietnam, for the longest time till the last stages of the US involvement, the army supported whomever was president. Give me a break. Cry me a river please. Boohoo. John Edwards said that George Bush is a moron and anyone who votes for him is equally moronic. Boo f***ing hoo. You conservatives disgust me. You take offense to singular comments about George Bush, yet don't feel any shame and handing most of these comments out. Go cry and watch FOX News with the sexual harasser. Fool.
October 16, 200422 yr The military always supports the commander in chief Accord. Even in Vietnam, for the longest time till the last stages of the US involvement, the army supported whomever was president. Give me a break Yup, the military loved Clinton. Anyways, John Edwards has no more political career. If he looses, North Carolina will NOT reelect him senator.
October 16, 200422 yr The military always supports the commander in chief Accord. Even in Vietnam, for the longest time till the last stages of the US involvement, the army supported whomever was president. Give me a break Yup, the military loved Clinton. Anyways, John Edwards has no more political career. If he looses, North Carolina will NOT reelect him senator. 593489[/snapback] Does the military love Bush? No. They support him because he's there commander as much as they don't like it.
October 16, 200422 yr Is this the guy you really want to be your next "senator" from North Carolina? Burr says he agrees with the administration's policies more than 90 percent of the time, including its stands on divisive issues such as the war in Iraq, tax cuts, the No Child Left Behind school accountability initiative, and social issues such as opposition to same-sex marriage. . . . . . Burr has been a top fund-raiser while in Congress. For the 2004 election cycle, he took in more than $1.9 million from political action committees, making him the top recipient of PAC money in the U.S. House, according to The Center for Responsive Politics, a nonprofit, nonpartisan government watchdog group. The center ranked Burr as the No. 1 recipient of PAC money from 12 categories of donors, including the medical, energy, tobacco, and telecom industries. Money from PACs and individual donations are the two biggest sources of campaign money for most members of Congress. Because of his PAC ranking, Democrats claim Burr is a puppet of business interests, saying PAC donations would skew his votes as a senator. Burr has answered that most of his support comes from individual donors and said he would vote in the interest of North Carolinians. Hmm, just another conservative serving the corporate free trade interests...
October 16, 200422 yr Yeah I'm for Burr but either way North Carolina can't lose. Bowles will be better than Edwards. Its looking like Bowles will win.
October 16, 200422 yr The military always supports the commander in chief Accord. Even in Vietnam, for the longest time till the last stages of the US involvement, the army supported whomever was president. Give me a break Yup, the military loved Clinton. Anyways, John Edwards has no more political career. If he looses, North Carolina will NOT reelect him senator. 593489[/snapback] Does the military love Bush? No. They support him because he's there commander as much as they don't like it. 593492[/snapback] You must know nothing about most people in the military. They fully support Bush over Kerry, they dont just support him because he's commander in cheif.
October 16, 200422 yr The military always supports the commander in chief Accord. Even in Vietnam, for the longest time till the last stages of the US involvement, the army supported whomever was president. Give me a break Yup, the military loved Clinton. Anyways, John Edwards has no more political career. If he looses, North Carolina will NOT reelect him senator. 593489[/snapback] Does the military love Bush? No. They support him because he's there commander as much as they don't like it. 593492[/snapback] You must know nothing about most people in the military. They fully support Bush over Kerry, they dont just support him because he's commander in cheif. 593499[/snapback] The military sample was far more likely to be Republican than Democratic, which could help explain the more favorable view of the president. The news story is found at this link: http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/10/15/...l.ap/index.html Get your facts son.
October 16, 200422 yr The military always supports the commander in chief Accord. Even in Vietnam, for the longest time till the last stages of the US involvement, the army supported whomever was president. Give me a break Yup, the military loved Clinton. Anyways, John Edwards has no more political career. If he looses, North Carolina will NOT reelect him senator. 593489[/snapback] Does the military love Bush? No. They support him because he's there commander as much as they don't like it. 593492[/snapback] You must know nothing about most people in the military. They fully support Bush over Kerry, they dont just support him because he's commander in cheif. 593499[/snapback] The military sample was far more likely to be Republican than Democratic, which could help explain the more favorable view of the president. The news story is found at this link: http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/10/15/...l.ap/index.html Get your facts son. 593503[/snapback] OF course the survey was more republican, the military is mostly republican.
October 16, 200422 yr The military always supports the commander in chief Accord. Even in Vietnam, for the longest time till the last stages of the US involvement, the army supported whomever was president. Give me a break Yup, the military loved Clinton. Anyways, John Edwards has no more political career. If he looses, North Carolina will NOT reelect him senator. 593489[/snapback] Does the military love Bush? No. They support him because he's there commander as much as they don't like it. 593492[/snapback] You must know nothing about most people in the military. They fully support Bush over Kerry, they dont just support him because he's commander in cheif. 593499[/snapback] The military sample was far more likely to be Republican than Democratic, which could help explain the more favorable view of the president. The news story is found at this link: http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/10/15/...l.ap/index.html Get your facts son. 593503[/snapback] OF course the survey was more republican, the military is mostly republican. 593505[/snapback] And there is a fairly sizable minority that is for Kerry. Almost 30%. Do some research please.
October 16, 200422 yr It's great how Kerry says he will unite the country(which he divided), but then his running mate says half the country lost their minds.
October 16, 200422 yr It's great how Kerry says he will unite the country(which he divided), but then his running mate says half the country lost their minds. 593520[/snapback] One doesn't mean another. Kerry will unite the country. Bush has driven the deepest rift not seen here since the civil war.
October 16, 200422 yr It's great how Kerry says he will unite the country(which he divided), but then his running mate says half the country lost their minds. 593520[/snapback] One doesn't mean another. Kerry will unite the country. Bush has driven the deepest rift not seen here since the civil war. 593527[/snapback] It's more of the seperation the country had when the federalist party came to an end. :plain
October 16, 200422 yr It's great how Kerry says he will unite the country(which he divided), but then his running mate says half the country lost their minds. 593520[/snapback] One doesn't mean another. Kerry will unite the country. Bush has driven the deepest rift not seen here since the civil war. 593527[/snapback] It's more of the seperation the country had when the federalist party came to an end. :plain 593532[/snapback] No... The country hasn't been this divided since the Civil War. It's basically Bushites vs. Kerryites with the few independants in between who want nothing to do with it.
October 16, 200422 yr It's great how Kerry says he will unite the country(which he divided), but then his running mate says half the country lost their minds. 593520[/snapback] One doesn't mean another. Kerry will unite the country. Bush has driven the deepest rift not seen here since the civil war. 593527[/snapback] It's more of the seperation the country had when the federalist party came to an end. :plain 593532[/snapback] No... The country hasn't been this divided since the Civil War. It's basically Bushites vs. Kerryites with the few independants in between who want nothing to do with it. 593535[/snapback] It's an election year, and one side is throwing extreme hate the other to win, of course the country is divided.
October 16, 200422 yr It's great how Kerry says he will unite the country(which he divided), but then his running mate says half the country lost their minds. 593520[/snapback] One doesn't mean another. Kerry will unite the country. Bush has driven the deepest rift not seen here since the civil war. 593527[/snapback] It's more of the seperation the country had when the federalist party came to an end. :plain 593532[/snapback] No... The country hasn't been this divided since the Civil War. It's basically Bushites vs. Kerryites with the few independants in between who want nothing to do with it. 593535[/snapback] It's an election year, and one side is throwing extreme hate the other to win, of course the country is divided. 593539[/snapback] Tell me when the country was this divided in recent history? 2000 election wasn't as divided, what occured after helped start it. The country was never this divided under Clinton, Bush senior, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, Eisenhower, Truman, FDR, Hoover, Coolidge, Harding the list goes on.
October 16, 200422 yr It's great how Kerry says he will unite the country(which he divided), but then his running mate says half the country lost their minds. 593520[/snapback] One doesn't mean another. Kerry will unite the country. Bush has driven the deepest rift not seen here since the civil war. 593527[/snapback] It's more of the seperation the country had when the federalist party came to an end. :plain 593532[/snapback] No... The country hasn't been this divided since the Civil War. It's basically Bushites vs. Kerryites with the few independants in between who want nothing to do with it. 593535[/snapback] It's an election year, and one side is throwing extreme hate the other to win, of course the country is divided. 593539[/snapback] Tell me when the country was this divided in recent history? 2000 election wasn't as divided, what occured after helped start it. The country was never this divided under Clinton, Bush senior, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, Eisenhower, Truman, FDR, Hoover, Coolidge, Harding the list goes on. 593556[/snapback] There was never a time since the early 1800's when a party was as desparate as the democrats are.
October 16, 200422 yr It's great how Kerry says he will unite the country(which he divided), but then his running mate says half the country lost their minds. 593520[/snapback] One doesn't mean another. Kerry will unite the country. Bush has driven the deepest rift not seen here since the civil war. 593527[/snapback] It's more of the seperation the country had when the federalist party came to an end. :plain 593532[/snapback] No... The country hasn't been this divided since the Civil War. It's basically Bushites vs. Kerryites with the few independants in between who want nothing to do with it. 593535[/snapback] It's an election year, and one side is throwing extreme hate the other to win, of course the country is divided. 593539[/snapback] Tell me when the country was this divided in recent history? 2000 election wasn't as divided, what occured after helped start it. The country was never this divided under Clinton, Bush senior, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, Eisenhower, Truman, FDR, Hoover, Coolidge, Harding the list goes on. 593556[/snapback] There was never a time since the early 1800's when a party was as desparate as the democrats are. 593557[/snapback] The democrats aren't desperate. The republicans aren't desperate. The Federalists were desperate. I don't see the democrats taking sections of the US and trying to get them to secede for their own political gains.
October 16, 200422 yr The democrats aren't desperate. The republicans aren't desperate. The Federalists were desperate. I don't see the democrats taking sections of the US and trying to get them to secede for their own political gains. The democratic party is in trouble and people need to realize that now. They have two of the biggest libs on the ticket. They allow Michael Moore and Jesse Jackson to speak for the party, and cast aside people like Joe Lieberman who suggest the party is becoming too far left. The democrats need Bush to win so they can four more years to get their party back in shape. Of course the democrats are desperate. They rely on a campaing on hate, accussations of suppressing minority votes, myths about the draft, and Edwards claiming Kerry will be able to make the handicapped walk again.
October 16, 200422 yr The democrats aren't desperate. The republicans aren't desperate. The Federalists were desperate. I don't see the democrats taking sections of the US and trying to get them to secede for their own political gains. The democratic party is in trouble and people need to realize that now. They have two of the biggest libs on the ticket. They allow Michael Moore and Jesse Jackson to speak for the party, and cast aside people like Joe Lieberman who suggest the party is becoming too far left. The democrats need Bush to win so they can four more years to get their party back in shape. 593566[/snapback] :lol :lol :lol Thats quite possibly the funniest reason I've ever seen for Bush to still be president. And the Republicans need four years of the Kerry administration to revert themselves to being moderate. When you allow people like Karl Rove to speak for your party, you know its time to shut down shop and vote against Bush.
October 16, 200422 yr The democrats aren't desperate. The republicans aren't desperate. The Federalists were desperate. I don't see the democrats taking sections of the US and trying to get them to secede for their own political gains. The democratic party is in trouble and people need to realize that now. They have two of the biggest libs on the ticket. They allow Michael Moore and Jesse Jackson to speak for the party, and cast aside people like Joe Lieberman who suggest the party is becoming too far left. The democrats need Bush to win so they can four more years to get their party back in shape. 593566[/snapback] And the Republicans need four years of the Kerry administration to revert themselves to being moderate. When you allow people like Karl Rove to speak for your party, you know its time to shut down shop and vote against Bush. 593568[/snapback] The republicans aren't the ones who need who need to become more moderate. The democratic is casting out moderates. The point is, democrats aren't seeing how left their party is becoming, and you're a prime example. The republicans had Ahnold, McCain, and Rudy had their convention, that's more moderate than the democrats' line of campaigners.
October 16, 200422 yr The democrats aren't desperate. The republicans aren't desperate. The Federalists were desperate. I don't see the democrats taking sections of the US and trying to get them to secede for their own political gains. The democratic party is in trouble and people need to realize that now. They have two of the biggest libs on the ticket. They allow Michael Moore and Jesse Jackson to speak for the party, and cast aside people like Joe Lieberman who suggest the party is becoming too far left. The democrats need Bush to win so they can four more years to get their party back in shape. 593566[/snapback] And the Republicans need four years of the Kerry administration to revert themselves to being moderate. When you allow people like Karl Rove to speak for your party, you know its time to shut down shop and vote against Bush. 593568[/snapback] The republicans aren't the ones who need who need to become more moderate. The democratic is casting out moderates. The point is, democrats aren't seeing how left their party is becoming, and you're a prime example. The republicans had Ahnold, McCain, and Rudy had their convention, that's more moderate than the democrats' line of campaigners. 593572[/snapback] McCain is the only one of those that is moderate. Rudy and the Guvernator certainly aren't. The Democratic party is definetly not casting moderates out. In fact, the Democratic party is the most united since I don't remember. The Republicans nowadays are its the neo-cons way or the highway. McCain should be a Democrat.
October 16, 200422 yr As a member of a household that was once Democratic and basically forced to the Republican side because of the party's shift to the left....the Democrats need to come back to the middle.
October 16, 200422 yr Wow. I agree with almost nothing said in this "debate" and yet can't help by say that this is awesome. Keep up the good work. I think it's time we opened up a board debate thread.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.