December 4, 200421 yr I'm not too sure of this one yet. I'm about 60 percent no, 40 percent yes. For the record I support Pete Rose being inducted into the Hall, but I don't believe he should be allowed to manage again or anything. I would also support the Veterans' Committee inducting Shoeless Joe Jackson. 626740[/snapback] When Pete Rose dies, he should be re-instated and put in the Hall. until then, keep him out
December 4, 200421 yr I'm not too sure of this one yet. I'm about 60 percent no, 40 percent yes. For the record I support Pete Rose being inducted into the Hall, but I don't believe he should be allowed to manage again or anything. I would also support the Veterans' Committee inducting Shoeless Joe Jackson. 626740[/snapback] When Pete Rose dies, he should be re-instated and put in the Hall. until then, keep him out 626741[/snapback] That's probably fair, since it will prevent him from making money off of his induction. Then again, who knows.
December 4, 200421 yr I'm not too sure of this one yet. I'm about 60 percent no, 40 percent yes. For the record I support Pete Rose being inducted into the Hall, but I don't believe he should be allowed to manage again or anything. I would also support the Veterans' Committee inducting Shoeless Joe Jackson. 626740[/snapback] When Pete Rose dies, he should be re-instated and put in the Hall. until then, keep him out 626741[/snapback] That's probably fair, since it will prevent him from making money off of his induction. Then again, who knows. 626747[/snapback] IMO we shouldn't even be talking about Pete Rose until Shoeless Joe is put in
December 4, 200421 yr I'm not too sure of this one yet. I'm about 60 percent no, 40 percent yes. For the record I support Pete Rose being inducted into the Hall, but I don't believe he should be allowed to manage again or anything. I would also support the Veterans' Committee inducting Shoeless Joe Jackson. 626740[/snapback] When Pete Rose dies, he should be re-instated and put in the Hall. until then, keep him out 626741[/snapback] That's probably fair, since it will prevent him from making money off of his induction. Then again, who knows. 626747[/snapback] IMO we shouldn't even be talking about Pete Rose until Shoeless Joe is put in 626753[/snapback] i agree totally the guy didn't deserve to be thrown out in the first place and he's one of the top 10 greatest outfielders ever, maybe even top 5
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.