Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

I know some might think it doesn't matter, but we currently have the worst winning percentage in the ALL of the majors during Spring Training...

Spring Training      Reg Season
Team          Year     W   L   Pct      W    L    Pct
Montreal      1998     8  23  .258      65   97  .401
Toronto       1996     9  22  .290      74   88  .457
Cincinnati    2002     9  22  .290      78   84  .481
Florida       1996     9  22  .290      80   82  .494
Anaheim       1997     9  21  .300      84   78  .519
San Francisco 1998     9  21  .300      89   74  .546
San Francisco 2001     9  21  .300      90   72  .556
New York AL   2001     9  20  .310      95   65  .594
Milwaukee     1998    10  22  .313      74   88  .457
Montreal      1996     9  18  .333      88   74  .543
Chicago AL    2002    11  21  .344      81   81  .500
Milwaukee     1999    11  20  .355      74   87  .460  
Milwaukee     1996    11  20  .355      80   82  .494  
Florida       2002    10  18  .357      79   83  .488  
Atlanta       1997    10  18  .357     101   61  .623
TOTALS               143 309  .316    1232 1196  .507

The bottom feeders tend to stay under .500, or miss the playoffs.

One has to admit that Jack played the kids a lot more than anyone expected him to. Usually I don't put a whole lot of faith on ST stats, but the win-loss % does concern me a little. I think that this week when the regulars play more will give a better outlook on this team.

Yanks are 11-12 this Spring, I'm sure they will be a below .500 team. :plain

722020[/snapback]

 

They finish below .500 in ST every year, usually they finish dead last or pretty darn close. Do they play anyone at all? Last year I am pretty sure they finished last in ST.

They finish below .500 in ST every year, usually they finish dead last or pretty darn close.

722022[/snapback]

 

Proves that ST means nothing.

722025[/snapback]

 

In the article you posted out of the bottom 15 records posted in ST only about 3 of the teams made the playoffs I think, one being the Yanks. The Braves and the Giants were the other teams.

They finish below .500 in ST every year, usually they finish dead last or pretty darn close.

722022[/snapback]

 

Proves that ST means nothing.

722025[/snapback]

 

In the article you posted out of the bottom 15 records posted in ST only about 3 of the teams made the playoffs I think, one being the Yanks. The Braves and the Giants were the other teams.

722029[/snapback]

 

8 out of 30 clubs make the playoffs... 3 out of 15 is about the same ratio (a bit lower). This means that the bottom feeders do, well, about average.

They finish below .500 in ST every year, usually they finish dead last or pretty darn close.

722022[/snapback]

 

Proves that ST means nothing.

722025[/snapback]

 

In the article you posted out of the bottom 15 records posted in ST only about 3 of the teams made the playoffs I think, one being the Yanks. The Braves and the Giants were the other teams.

722029[/snapback]

 

8 out of 30 clubs make the playoffs... 3 out of 15 is about the same ratio (a bit lower). This means that the bottom feeders do, well, about average.

722043[/snapback]

 

I said out of the bottom 15 records not out of all the teams in the article. If you notice the other 15 are the 15 teams with the best spring training record.

They finish below .500 in ST every year, usually they finish dead last or pretty darn close.

722022[/snapback]

 

Proves that ST means nothing.

722025[/snapback]

 

In the article you posted out of the bottom 15 records posted in ST only about 3 of the teams made the playoffs I think, one being the Yanks. The Braves and the Giants were the other teams.

722029[/snapback]

 

8 out of 30 clubs make the playoffs... 3 out of 15 is about the same ratio (a bit lower). This means that the bottom feeders do, well, about average.

722043[/snapback]

 

I said out of the bottom 15 records not out of all the teams in the article. If you notice the other 15 are the 15 teams with the best spring training record.

722048[/snapback]

 

I know... I am saying that 8 out of the 30 MLB teams make the playoffs every year, and so 3 out of 15 is pretty close to the ratio that applies to all teams.

They finish below .500 in ST every year, usually they finish dead last or pretty darn close.

722022[/snapback]

 

Proves that ST means nothing.

722025[/snapback]

 

In the article you posted out of the bottom 15 records posted in ST only about 3 of the teams made the playoffs I think, one being the Yanks. The Braves and the Giants were the other teams.

722029[/snapback]

 

8 out of 30 clubs make the playoffs... 3 out of 15 is about the same ratio (a bit lower). This means that the bottom feeders do, well, about average.

722043[/snapback]

 

I said out of the bottom 15 records not out of all the teams in the article. If you notice the other 15 are the 15 teams with the best spring training record.

722048[/snapback]

 

I know... I am saying that 8 out of the 30 MLB teams make the playoffs every year, and so 3 out of 15 is pretty close to the ratio that applies to all teams.

722050[/snapback]

 

But it spans from different years. You are trying to make up a number.

 

I think they looked from 1996 ST to 2002 ST, that is 7 seasons in total. That means over that span 56 teams made the playoffs, 3 of them having on of the 15th worst ST records. 3:56 is about 1:20. Or about 5%. So if you finish with less than 11 wins in ST, historically, you make the playoffs 1 out of 20 times. Then again the 2 of the 3 teams were the Yanks and Braves. Yanks always lay stinkers in spring and the Braves are the Braves.

Of the 24 games we have played, we've seen Pierre for 5 games, Delgado for 11, Lo Duca for 12, Gonzalez for 14, and Lowell and Castillo for 15. Even assuming one could even buy into the silly argument that players play EXACTLY the same in spring as they do in the regular season, Im pretty sure we will see our entire offense around for more than 63% of the season AT BEST.

 

Face it guys. There is no link.

They finish below .500 in ST every year, usually they finish dead last or pretty darn close.

722022[/snapback]

 

Proves that ST means nothing.

722025[/snapback]

 

In the article you posted out of the bottom 15 records posted in ST only about 3 of the teams made the playoffs I think, one being the Yanks. The Braves and the Giants were the other teams.

722029[/snapback]

 

8 out of 30 clubs make the playoffs... 3 out of 15 is about the same ratio (a bit lower). This means that the bottom feeders do, well, about average.

722043[/snapback]

 

I said out of the bottom 15 records not out of all the teams in the article. If you notice the other 15 are the 15 teams with the best spring training record.

722048[/snapback]

 

I know... I am saying that 8 out of the 30 MLB teams make the playoffs every year, and so 3 out of 15 is pretty close to the ratio that applies to all teams.

722050[/snapback]

 

But it spans from different years. You are trying to make up a number.

 

I think they looked from 1996 ST to 2002 ST, that is 7 seasons in total. That means over that span 56 teams made the playoffs, 3 of them having on of the 15th worst ST records. 3:56 is about 1:20. Or about 5%. So if you finish with less than 11 wins in ST, historically, you make the playoffs 1 out of 20 times. Then again the 2 of the 3 teams were the Yanks and Braves. Yanks always lay stinkers in spring and the Braves are the Braves.

722054[/snapback]

 

 

sorry, i didn't realize you meant 3 out of the WHOLE 15 worse ST records from 96 to 2002. I agree with your argument, then. However, it's farfetched to say "historically" because this analysis only covers 7 ST's and subsequent regular seasons.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...
Background Picker
Customize Layout