Jump to content

79


Recommended Posts

Were getting hits and runners on base but were not hitting with RISP...

 

We've outhit the Nationals in the first 2 games of the series 20-15...we outhit them in both games, but yet, we lost.

 

We need some more home runs, especially from Delgado, because at times like these, those home runs will just automatically give us the runs, and we won't have to worry about hitting with RISP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were getting hits and runners on base but were not hitting with RISP...

 

We've outhit the Nationals in the first 2 games of the series 20-15...we outhit them in both games, but yet, we lost.

 

We need some more home runs, especially from Delgado, because at times like these, those home runs will just automatically give us the runs, and we won't have to worry about hitting with RISP.

796370[/snapback]

 

Since when do home runs automatically give us runs :banghead :banghead

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were getting hits and runners on base but were not hitting with RISP...

 

We've outhit the Nationals in the first 2 games of the series 20-15...we outhit them in both games, but yet, we lost.

 

We need some more home runs, especially from Delgado, because at times like these, those home runs will just automatically give us the runs, and we won't have to worry about hitting with RISP.

796370[/snapback]

 

Since when do home runs automatically give us runs :banghead :banghead

796535[/snapback]

We get runners on and then we can't bring them in.

 

If Delgado would stop striking out in those situations with runners on and would start hitting some 2 or 3 run homers then we wouldn't have such a big problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Change that to an 84 after today's game. :plain

797281[/snapback]

PB my good man, the Nats had 5 LOB, we had 12

 

so make that 79, a 91

797286[/snapback]

 

I kept it over 10 games.

 

Add 12, subtract 7 from 5/26....thus 84

797293[/snapback]

my bad...

 

fact is we suck :mischief

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Change that to an 84 after today's game.? :plain

797281[/snapback]

PB my good man, the Nats had 5 LOB, we had 12

 

so make that 79, a 91

797286[/snapback]

 

I kept it over 10 games.

 

Add 12, subtract 7 from 5/26....thus 84

797293[/snapback]

my bad...

 

fact is we suck :mischief

797294[/snapback]

Some teams can't even get runners on base...atleast we can get runners on base.

 

We don't suck, bandwagoner! :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Change that to an 84 after today's game. :plain

797281[/snapback]

PB my good man, the Nats had 5 LOB, we had 12

 

so make that 79, a 91

797286[/snapback]

 

I kept it over 10 games.

 

Add 12, subtract 7 from 5/26....thus 84

797293[/snapback]

my bad...

 

fact is we suck :mischief

797294[/snapback]

Some teams can't even get runners on base...atleast we can get runners on base.

 

We don't suck, bandwagoner! :p

797297[/snapback]

go away

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The LOB stat is misleading. We've had many baserunners from 2-out hits and walks that no one was going to drive in anyway. It's not that we have a problem driving in runs, it's that we aren't setting the table. That means everyone. We need to stop swinging at bad pitches, and get on base anyway possible earlier in innings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Change that to an 84 after today's game.? :plain

797281[/snapback]

PB my good man, the Nats had 5 LOB, we had 12

 

so make that 79, a 91

797286[/snapback]

 

I kept it over 10 games.

 

Add 12, subtract 7 from 5/26....thus 84

797293[/snapback]

my bad...

 

fact is we suck :mischief

797294[/snapback]

Some teams can't even get runners on base...atleast we can get runners on base.

 

We don't suck, bandwagoner! :p

797297[/snapback]

 

 

right now we have TOO MANY PROBLEMS!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Change that to an 84 after today's game.? :plain

797281[/snapback]

PB my good man, the Nats had 5 LOB, we had 12

 

so make that 79, a 91

797286[/snapback]

 

I kept it over 10 games.

 

Add 12, subtract 7 from 5/26....thus 84

797293[/snapback]

my bad...

 

fact is we suck :mischief

797294[/snapback]

Some teams can't even get runners on base...atleast we can get runners on base.

 

We don't suck, bandwagoner! :p

797297[/snapback]

 

 

right now we have TOO MANY PROBLEMS!!!

797531[/snapback]

Not really.

 

Basically the only thing is that were not hitting with RISP.

 

And MAYBE you can add in Perisho sucking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Nationals completed their three-game sweep of the Marlins with a 6-3 win in Washington. Florida left 35 runners on base during the three-game series, the highest such total this season for a team that suffered a three-game sweep.

 

 

Ouch

797680[/snapback]

 

That gives a real good indication of just how bad it has become.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe I actually said it, but yesterday after watching us give up yet another game on sloppy play, stranding baserunners and HORRID relief pitching, all I could say as I switched off the tube was "Man, we really SUCK."

 

I have never said that before about our Marlins - and never thought I would. This is getting ugly. I love our guys, but something has to be done - because this mix just isn't working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...