April 9, 200620 yr If this true, Bush has lost his mind. It would extremely hyprocritical to tell Iran how it can't develop nukes, and then nuke them. Not to mention the fact that using nuclear weapons at all in today's world would cause worldwide outrage. Bush 'is planning nuclear strikes on Iran's secret sites' By Philip Sherwell in Washington Jack Straw: Iran attack would be 'nuts' The Bush administration is planning to use nuclear weapons against Iran, to prevent it acquiring its own atomic warheads, claims an investigative writer with high-level Pentagon and intelligence contacts. The Pentagon consultant on the war on terror confirmed that some in the administration were looking seriously at this option, which he linked to a resurgence of interest in tactical nuclear weapons among defence department political appointees. Article
April 9, 200620 yr Please tell me this isnt true. Not even I think this administration is this nuts. Pre-emptive nuke would change the world as we know it, and I dont think it would go in our favor.
April 9, 200620 yr Nice knowing everyone if this happens. And to think, I thought this administration had fallen off their rocker long ago...this is something I couldnt even imagine they would even 'consider'
April 9, 200620 yr Iran is a dangerous foe. I hope they don't tread the line here.... Ugh, now this will be on the back of my mind... WTF IS HE THINKING.
April 9, 200620 yr I'm not for pre-emptive attacks and feel they are a radical philosphy. I doubt it!
April 9, 200620 yr Look at the source, jesus christ. And it's probably just another contingency plan, nothing more, nothing less. We have plans to invade Canada among other things which will never happen, but plans such as that exist. This is no different. Get over it and quit your whining.
April 9, 200620 yr Author And it's probably just another contingency plan, nothing more, nothing less. We have plans to invade Canada among other things which will never happen, but plans such as that exist. This is no different. Well, invading Canada doesn't have to happen as long as they accept annexation. :mischief
April 9, 200620 yr Look at the source, jesus christ. The London Daily Telegraph? You DO know that's a conservative publication, right?
April 9, 200620 yr Look at the source, jesus christ. The London Daily Telegraph? You DO know that's a conservative publication, right? You DO know that conservative has an entirely different meaning in the UK, right?
April 9, 200620 yr I think President Bush just performed a pocket veto with the clipping of the Telegraph he was given on this.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.