Jump to content


Rep. of 9/11 Families Group - Government Cover-up


Junior
 Share

Recommended Posts

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/july2006/...ntcomplicit.htm

 

Representative Of Largest 9/11 Families Group Says Government Complicit In Attack

 

Tells radio host 9/11 Commission a sham, "cover-up beyond belief"

 

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | July 8 2006

 

The representative of the largest group of 9/11 families says that the official version of events is a fallacy and that the NORAD stand down and evidence of incendiary devices used to bring down the towers amount to government complicity in the attacks - a conclusion shared by half of the 9/11 families he represents.

 

Doyle heads the Coalition of 9/11 Families and lost his own son Joey in the collapse of the twin towers.

 

"If you want to believe what they want to snow you under on like the 9/11 Commission - that's a total fallacy," said Doyle.

 

"The continuing cover-up is beyond belief," Doyle told GCN radio host Alex Jones.

 

Doyle questioned why WTC steel that was withheld from NIST for examination for explosives was used instead to build a battleship.

 

"Isn't it amazing how they got it out of this country within days," said Doyle as he addressed the cover-up of the physical evidence from a crime scene.

 

Doyle said he had personally talked to six different individuals who were at the World Trade Center site and described incendiary devices before the collapse of the towers.

 

"It's documented proof that tower 7 was not hit by a plane yet it goes up in flames then the owner of the place Admin Silverstein himself ordered it to be pulled at 4 o'clock that afternoon and all of a sudden it exploded straight down."

 

"We have two planes fly into the towers and all of a sudden they get blown up within an hour and a half - that's impossible," said Doyle.

 

Doyle estimated that around half of the family members his organization represents think that there was government complicity in the attacks.

 

"It looks like there was a conspiracy behind 9/11 if you really look at all the facts - a lot of families now feel the same way."

 

"Where was NORAD," asked Doyle as he highlighted the implausible gap between the known hijacking times of Flight 93 and Flight 77 and their eventual destruction.

 

"It was called a step-down - don't do anything - let it happen."

 

"From everything I look at I'm sure there was a lot of complicity - in the least there had to be a lot of complicity - if you read all the facts there's no way that nineteen hijackers carried out this mission," Doyle told Jones.

 

Doyle also spoke out on establishment charities withholding large portions of donations from 9/11 families and how 9/11 whistleblowers have been punished meanwhile individuals who facilitated the attacks were rewarded.

 

Prison Planet.tv members can hear this entire interview by clicking here. Please consider subscribing to Prison Planet.tv by clicking here.

 

 

I have heard some semi-convincing arguments, however this is not one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see 9/11 as a conspiracy, although there are plenty of unanswered questions from that day. One of which is what the Saudi government's role was that was blacked out of the official 9/11 report. It would also be nice of the government to release more of the security camera tapes from locations around the Pentagon, including a highway camera that the plane flew over shortly before impact. All were seized by the FBI, and few have been shown publicly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see 9/11 as a conspiracy, although there are plenty of unanswered questions from that day. One of which is what the Saudi government's role was that was blacked out of the official 9/11 report. It would also be nice of the government to release more of the security camera tapes from locations around the Pentagon, including a highway camera that the plane flew over shortly before impact. All were seized by the FBI, and few have been shown publicly.

 

 

 

why should they be`shown to the public?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see 9/11 as a conspiracy, although there are plenty of unanswered questions from that day. One of which is what the Saudi government's role was that was blacked out of the official 9/11 report. It would also be nice of the government to release more of the security camera tapes from locations around the Pentagon, including a highway camera that the plane flew over shortly before impact. All were seized by the FBI, and few have been shown publicly.

 

 

 

why should they be`shown to the public?

Yeah, screw government accountability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there is a few interesting videos upon theories of how long it should of taken the buildings to collapse and how they collapsed like they did straight down. Of course I expect alot of the "facts" in them are twisted towards their arguement almost as much as Cheney taking a friend hunting and "accidently" shooting him in the face :)

 

But I will leave it up to engineers to explain either way for the building fell correctly or not.

 

Did the government know something was up and didnt act? Yes

Did Bush's response, sitting there and drooling over himself for a few minutes really a failure? Yes

Was 9/11 used to start an illegal and unacceptable war in iraq which has costs thousands of american lives and tens of Thousands of civilian lives and fostered hatred for the US around the world? Yes

 

But do I believe the US planned 9/11? A little far fetched there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see 9/11 as a conspiracy, although there are plenty of unanswered questions from that day. One of which is what the Saudi government's role was that was blacked out of the official 9/11 report. It would also be nice of the government to release more of the security camera tapes from locations around the Pentagon, including a highway camera that the plane flew over shortly before impact. All were seized by the FBI, and few have been shown publicly.

 

 

 

why should they be`shown to the public?

 

Uh, because democracies aren't supposed to have anything to hide, therefore any and all pertinent information should be available to the people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there is a few interesting videos upon theories of how long it should of taken the buildings to collapse and how they collapsed like they did straight down. Of course I expect alot of the "facts" in them are twisted towards their arguement almost as much as Cheney taking a friend hunting and "accidently" shooting him in the face :)

 

But I will leave it up to engineers to explain either way for the building fell correctly or not.

 

Did the government know something was up and didnt act? Yes

Did Bush's response, sitting there and drooling over himself for a few minutes really a failure? Yes

Was 9/11 used to start an illegal and unacceptable war in iraq which has costs thousands of american lives and tens of Thousands of civilian lives and fostered hatred for the US around the world? Yes

 

But do I believe the US planned 9/11? A little far fetched there.

 

wow...so well said, this is all i will say...and when you say civillian lives, i assume you mean iraqi...waits for accord to tell me how im wrong because iraqi lives dont matter, that their deaths are just a part of war and the democracy that is being given to them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see 9/11 as a conspiracy, although there are plenty of unanswered questions from that day. One of which is what the Saudi government's role was that was blacked out of the official 9/11 report. It would also be nice of the government to release more of the security camera tapes from locations around the Pentagon, including a highway camera that the plane flew over shortly before impact. All were seized by the FBI, and few have been shown publicly.

 

 

 

why should they be`shown to the public?

 

Uh, because democracies aren't supposed to have anything to hide, therefore any and all pertinent information should be available to the people.

 

Nope, not true at all, especially when it comes to security related activities. If any of those tapes are still being used to do any type of investigation they should definitely not be released, otherwise then yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...