January 24, 200818 yr don't know if anybody knows this but D.Samson does a weekly show on 790 the ticket with LeTard....guess who sponsors his 15 minutes on the show? Braman Honda :| That's real good-irony of irony-unless-------as Fogelberg sang, it is all part of the plan. Let's think conspiracy, the Marlins don't actually prefer the OB site, do they? :whistle You can stop with the conspiracy theory. A few weeks ago, when the news of Braman's opposition was first reported, Samson came on that show and said he was aware of the irony that Braman was sponsoring the show. He said he had a lot of respect for Braman, but in this case he was dead wrong, and Samson said he has told him so.
January 25, 200818 yr don't know if anybody knows this but D.Samson does a weekly show on 790 the ticket with LeTard....guess who sponsors his 15 minutes on the show? Braman Honda :| That's real good-irony of irony-unless-------as Fogelberg sang, it is all part of the plan. Let's think conspiracy, the Marlins don't actually prefer the OB site, do they? :whistle You can stop with the conspiracy theory. A few weeks ago, when the news of Braman's opposition was first reported, Samson came on that show and said he was aware of the irony that Braman was sponsoring the show. He said he had a lot of respect for Braman, but in this case he was dead wrong, and Samson said he has told him so. Good to know. Oh, comprende tongue in cheek?
January 25, 200818 yr don't know if anybody knows this but D.Samson does a weekly show on 790 the ticket with LeTard....guess who sponsors his 15 minutes on the show? Braman Honda :| That's real good-irony of irony-unless-------as Fogelberg sang, it is all part of the plan. Let's think conspiracy, the Marlins don't actually prefer the OB site, do they? :whistle You can stop with the conspiracy theory. A few weeks ago, when the news of Braman's opposition was first reported, Samson came on that show and said he was aware of the irony that Braman was sponsoring the show. He said he had a lot of respect for Braman, but in this case he was dead wrong, and Samson said he has told him so. Good to know. Oh, comprende tongue in cheek? I knew you were joking. Just posting what I heard on the show.
February 21, 200818 yr i heard on cbs4 that braman lawsuit is going to court on friday let hope judge donot say that voter will need agree to use money for ballpark
February 21, 200818 yr i heard on cbs4 that braman lawsuit is going to court on friday let hope judge donot say that voter will need agree to use money for ballpark Judge won't say that because that is not what the lawsuit is asking for and not what Friday's hearing is all about.
February 21, 200818 yr i heard on cbs4 that braman lawsuit is going to court on friday let hope judge donot say that voter will need agree to use money for ballpark Judge won't say that because that is not what the lawsuit is asking for and not what Friday's hearing is all about. what is about? reporter say braman want voter to say he want voter to vote for ballpark
February 21, 200818 yr what is about? reporter say braman want voter to say he want voter to vote for ballpark Braman is looking for an expedited hearing on the matter and a temporary injunction to hold off on stadium construction until his lawsuit is settled. His lawsuit is not asking for a vote. The reporter is being lazy (as are most TV reporters) who don't bother to do any of the necessary work to actually report the facts.
February 21, 200818 yr what is about? reporter say braman want voter to say he want voter to vote for ballpark Braman is looking for an expedited hearing on the matter and a temporary injunction to hold off on stadium construction until his lawsuit is settled. His lawsuit is not asking for a vote. The reporter is being lazy (as are most TV reporters) who don't bother to do any of the necessary work to actually report the facts. The report also included the Mayor saying that he and the county's lawyers believe that they are on solid legal footing. As a lawyer, do you agree?
February 21, 200818 yr Can someone explain to me what Braman's angle is in all this? Is he simply a fiscal conservative who doesn't believe tax money should go towards a stadium? Or does he have some other angle here I'm not seeing?
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.