Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

MarlinsBaseball.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Bailouts

Featured Replies

  • Author

On the other hand, "right to work" states give companies free rein to crush unionization movements. Point?

What exactly do you mean by "crush unionization movements"? You mean having the ability to fire employees who create a union? This may sound crazy, but I would imagine that an employer has the right to decide who they employ and who they don't, especially on the basis of someone working towards creating a situation which would negatively impact the company's earnings (like a strike).

On the other hand, "right to work" states give companies free rein to crush unionization movements. Point?

 

 

I don't see how this disproves my point in any way. I'm for freedom for people to create unions, freedom of people to join a union, and freedom of private enterprises to refuse to allow either. Freedom is a terrible thing isn't it?

On the other hand, "right to work" states give companies free rein to crush unionization movements. Point?

 

 

I don't see how this disproves my point in any way. I'm for freedom for people to create unions, freedom of people to join a union, and freedom of private enterprises to refuse to allow either. Freedom is a terrible thing isn't it?

 

I agree with you. But if an employer agrees to a contract with a union and the contract calls for the employer to hire only employees that are members of the union then they have to abide by that. I don't agree with the "right to work" statutes because they undermine the right to contract.

One thing people neglect to mention is that as unions have lost power and/or disappeared nationwide over the past several decades, it has happened almost simultaneously with a steady decline in wages.

 

Should union membership be mandatory? No way. That doesn't make sense. It's a right, not a requirement.

 

While I will certainly concede that several of the unions in this country have lost their way or become too powerful (the MLBPA comes to mind as a sports example), overall they have helped to build the economic power of this nation.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.