January 19, 201214 yr http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=20061281&topic_id=7417714&tcid=fb_MLBNETWORK_20061281&c_id=mlb summary: no Fielder. Hanley's adjusted to 3B.
January 19, 201214 yr http://mlb.mlb.com/v...061281&c_id=mlb summary: no Fielder. Hanley's adjusted to 3B. He actually never said flat out that they were not interested in Fielder. He seemed like he was beating around the bush quite a bit when he was asked about Prince.
January 19, 201214 yr That seemed the very definition and the vision I get when someone is avoiding the question and trying to not make a flat out denial. Of course we like our team right now, but he would probably love it will fielder at first.
January 19, 201214 yr I saw it as Beinfest stating that they wouldn't overpay for Fielder, but if an opportunity to jump in arose, then we would. He dodged the question.
January 19, 201214 yr I'd like to make an addition to this conversation, but their transition graphic and sound effect they use every five seconds is driving my ADHD up the wall. STOP DOING THAT!
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.