The Bridgeport Man Eater

Oh. Gotcha SM. Im on the anti-French boat too, but I wasnt really thinking in those terms about the island. Either way, good point.

First, that beach is definitely real. Second, why is half that island a sh*thole? Its in the Caribbean and it looks like itd be a nice place to spend a vacation. Of course, Ive never been there, but I like the tropics, so Im assuming its nice. Is there a reason its not? Third, I think it would be cool as sh*t to lay there while a plane landed. Itd be like Waynes World.

Because the whole idea of my idea is to ultimately save humanity. In this case, brutality is the way to do it. The only way. I dont want these people to die, although sending death squads to their homes would certainly be more efficent. I simply want them separated from the rest of us, so they cant spread their killer disease to us, and thus AIDS eventually dies out. Again, I dont support killing or isolating retards because I believe its societys job to support those people. They didnt have a choice to be that way. Their symptoms arent contagious, so theres no possibility that theyll take a bunch of us down with them. And if you havent noticed, saving the government a ton of money isnt necessarily a goal of mine. People infected with AIDS, on the other hand, had the choice when they decided to bang whoever it is that gave them the disease. Its their fault they got it. The rest of us, who arent so sexually active and a little more cautious, dont end up with murderous STDs. If they all wanted to give their promise to the rest of us, and say theyd put their wangs away forever, Id be fine with letting them stay. Like I said earlier, I am so meticulous that such a thing will never happen to me, and my girl doesnt have it. So I am safe. Go ahead and ignore my suggestions, because AIDS really isnt my problem. Now, on the constitutional issue, my point was that its the same Constitution and it hasnt always been right. Some people read something from there, and say, "well, its the Constitution so we should listen", but if you really look at it, it has done some pretty lame things. Like releasing that killer (upon his arrest, they found a gun that matched the murder weapon) and like favoring criminals over cops and victims. Dont you have a problem with that? Im sick of having two time child molesters in the same neighborhood. Im sick of known killers walking free on technicalities. Im sick of cops losing to drug dealers because their successful searches were in the end unjustified. In most places, the law puts away dangerous criminals. Here, it makes sure they have every possible advantage to keep their freedom. Im sick of that sh*t. Put the crooks away!

Youre going to fault the solution for not being perfect because of its misuse? Lets follow that logic. If putting criminals in prison prevented crime by creating a disincentive(the solution), then there would be no crime and people wouldnt commit crime because they would be afraid(the demand for perfection of the solution). But crime is still around and people commit crime even when they know they will go to jail(the misuse of the solution). So the only solution to crime is to destroy humanity.(the insane alternative). And here is evidence that condom use does reduce AIDS: Thailand After peaking at around 140,000 cases in 1991, the number of new HIV infections in Thailand declined to an estimated 21,000 in 2003. This dramatic fall was mainly due to increased condom use by men and a reduction in their use of brothels. Cambodia: Recent efforts to halt the spread of the epidemic, including a programme promoting 100% condom use, have enjoyed some success. Figures indicate that HIV prevalence amongst brothel-based sex workers dropped from 43% to 29% between 1998 and 2002. Lao Overall, less than 1% of indirect sex workers tested in 2000 were found to be HIV-positive. One of the reasons for the fairly low prevalence rates in the Lao People's Democratic Republic might be that consistent condom use is comparatively high amongst female sex workers - 73% in 2000. About two thirds of the police and military, and three quarters of truck drivers, said they always used condoms with a paid partner. http://www.avert.org/aidssoutheastasia.htm And btw, where are you going to put all of these people? No, not at all. People with cerebral palsy arent infected with a contagious disease that is easily spread and will kill people. HIV positive people can spread their illness, and thus kill more people. Which is why I advocate removing them from society. Such a policy obviously works, because you wont find anyone with AIDS in Cuba. And whys that? Because Fidel got rid of them. And if you are so insistent on their freedom, it could be that way. We could castrate the guys and sew the womens vaginas shut. How bout it? But they have an adverse affect on society don't they? Its the same inhumane approach to society in general that Im comparing. Remember, Hitler tried to take a similiar approach on people he deemed to have an adverse affect on society. And the due process clause, via substanitive due process and not procedural due process, prevents such a heinous government policy. I cant believe it is even considered in this country. Well, since destroying humanity isnt really an option, are there other to completely prevent crime? No. Theres nothing. There will always be crime. It has many factors, mainly poverty. And since there will always be poverty there will always be crime. But is there a surefire way to prevent AIDS? Yeah, there is. The main reason I support my policy is that its already been put in use. If Fidel hadnt already proven that it works, I wouldnt support it. But it obviously does, which is why I think we should use it here. I cant say I appreciate the comparisons to Adolf. Thats stretching it. Adolf tried to get rid of anyone who didnt look, act and think like he did. He claimed Jews and gypsies and gays and so on were dangerous. However, no matter what he might have said, they werent. I am advocating removing from society (and not killing, btw) people who do pose a danger. Now, where to put them? Thats the problem. I dont really know. I dont have any real suggestions either. Ask Fidel, he obviously knows where to put them. I realize its far fetched for such a huge country. And I realize no one would ever use it, assuming Im never president. So go ahead. Try your methods. Your safe sex, your AIDS walks, your blankets. But I assure you, there will always be AIDS. None of the solutions out there are ever going to change that. Whatever. I know my girlfriend doesnt have AIDS, so Im safe for now. And as meticulous as I am, I guarantee Ill never do a girl with AIDS. It simply wont happen. I am safe. So much for trying to help the rest of the world. And the due process clause, via substanitive due process and not procedural due process, prevents such a heinous government policy. I cant believe it is even considered in this country. Just out of curiousity, do you know what the Evil of Leon is? Let me tell you. The basic story is that a Boston police officer was shot and killed by a known drug dealer. Police knew who did it, and they used an anonymous tip (which they had made up and faked) to go out and arrest the dealer for the murder. Upon arriving to see the suspect, the DA asked about this tipper, and when an officer confessed that he didnt exist, they released the killer, for good. A cop killer. A known cop killer. Walking free, because the cops made up a tip to arrest him. This is due process, and this is what the Constitution did. Doesnt it bother you that the Constitution supports drug dealers over police officers? No where in that document is anything to protect the victims or the cops, but there are FOUR to protect the criminals. Isnt that disgraceful? Also, I plan to be a cop. So I might be a little biased. Sorry.

1. This isnt a liberal/conservative issue. Im sure the religious right wouldnt be too happy with taking innocent civilians and disposing of them like animals. Last time I checked, a lot of people with AIDS arent gay. Stop trying to put idiotic labels on people. Ok, Im sorry for trying to believe that this is a liberal/conservative thing. I WAS WRONG, and I shouldnt have tried to make it that way. However, find a post on this board in which I state that most people with AIDS are gay, or where I even give a stance on homosexuals. I never have mentioned that topic, and if you thought it was implied, I assure you, it wasnt. 2. How can you defend such an extreme policy? I imagine you would go so far as to exile the disabled also since they are not productive enough to compensate their cost on society? Should we kill people with cerebral palsy? Maybe the elderly should be killed off since they take up so much health funds. Should we exile people who have weaker immune systems and often get the cold? This policy is seriously nuts. No, not at all. People with cerebral palsy arent infected with a contagious disease that is easily spread and will kill people. HIV positive people can spread their illness, and thus kill more people. Which is why I advocate removing them from society. Such a policy obviously works, because you wont find anyone with AIDS in Cuba. And whys that? Because Fidel got rid of them. And if you are so insistent on their freedom, it could be that way. We could castrate the guys and sew the womens vaginas shut. How bout it? :blink: 3. Your condom argument is false. Stop listening to the Vatican for scientific analysis: Condoms are the other important part of HIV prevention. That's latex condoms, used correctly, every time you have intercourse. Forget the stories about HIV swimming right through the pores in condoms - HIV is usually bonded on to a cell which is far too large to pass through the pores, and the surface tension of the semen is also a factor in keeping HIV in the condom. A study of 250 couples where one partner was HIV positive found that among the couples who used condoms consistently and correctly, none of the uninfected partners became infected. Condom use in Thailand has substantially reduced the HIV infection rate there, which was skyrocketing because of the very active sex trade. http://www.ualberta.ca/dept/health/public_...fo/aidsprev.htm Claims that latex condoms allow HIV to pass through are unfounded. The pores of latex condoms are too small to allow HIV to pass through. Condoms have been shown to be effective barriers not only to HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, but also to herpes simplex, CMV, hepatitis B, chlamydia and gonorrhea.2 "Condoms for prevention of sexually transmitted diseases," Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 1998; 37:133-137. Oh and not to mention that little thing called the constitution which you seem to have no regards for. Fine, I was wrong on that as well. I had heard the rumor somewhere, it didnt seem that extraordinary, and I believed. You have actual facts, so, you win. Kudos. But if condoms and safe sex completely prevented AIDS, then the numbers would be going down, wouldnt they? But theyre not. People continue to get AIDS. Whys that? Because not everyone uses condoms. So thats not going to work. One, and only one, solution has worked. And Fidel knows what it is.

Safe sex? Safe sex wont stop AIDS. The microscopic holes in a typical condom are BIGGER than the actual virus. So please explain to me how thats supposed to be successful? Abstinence is the only way, and since no one would listen to that, I propose a quarantine. Sadly, only a communist dictator has been gutsy enough to do it so far.

So, **** baseball, it's boring anyway. Football is definately more exciting now. I know, the NFL is riveting. Here's a game sample: Kickoff: Holding on the return team, 10 yard penalty. 1st and 10: Play blown dead, false start on the offense. 1st and 15: Pass completion for 0 yards. 2nd and 15: Defensive pass interference for breathing on the wide receiver, 40 yard penalty. 1st and 10: Offensive holding. 1st and 20: Unsportsmanlike conduct for touching the quarterback, 15 yard penalty. 1st and 10: Defensive pass interference, 60 yard penalty. 1st and goal: Pass complete for Touchdown. After 15 minute review, call reversed, incomplete. 2nd and goal: 1 yard run, touchdown. Penalty for taunting, 15 yards. aaah nevermind I like football too. You forgot to mention that within those nine plays theres bound to be atleast six minutes of commercials.

Fine, dude, you dont like AIDS people being exiled, then please suggest another solution. Got any ideas? No, you dont, because there arent any. Youre nothing but an ignorant liberal who believes we should be nice to everyone from the terrorists at Gitmo to HIV infected people. Well guess what? Sometimes brutality is the only cure! You remember the movie Training Day where Alonzo tells Jake that it takes a wolf to catch a wolf? Well, its like that. AIDS is a wolf, and to stop it, we gotta be the wolf. Being nice to everyone simply wont work! Its a good thing I didnt bring up my other solution that allowed AIDS people to remain in society with slight dysfunctions. :plain

Im a Republican, and while Castro is a douchebag, he is not dangerous. He might be totalitarian, but in the big scheme of things, alongside guys like Saddam and Kim Jong Il, Fidel is small fry. Also, he has pretty much cured AIDS in society with his brutality. He did the only possible cure, the one that no one else is willing to use. He removed all HIV positive people from his society. Thats the only way AIDS will ever be cured. AIDS walks and memorial blankets and science do nothing against it. I wish the rest of the world could understand that.

Just so you guys know, from a White Sox fan, the Cubs are always close to getting everybody. They claimed to be the main suitors for Furcal, and Giles and so on. The only problem is that they never actually succeed.

Drug smuggling and dealing is somewhat more harmful to society than stealing oranges from the market, in my opinion. Although it is a good analogy that you make.

I cant say I feel sorry for them, and I hope the US government doesnt waste and time or effort to have them released. I dont have an issue with protesters, but people should be smart enough to realize that Iraq is a dangerous place and that the insurgents dont care what their stances are. They will simply kidnap anything Western. If you dont like the heat, stay out of the kitchen.

Well, it seems the people in charge have forgotten 9/11. Scissors less than 4 inches long? Why dont they just reinstate boxcutters while theyre at it?

Singapore is sometimes referred to as "fine city" because of all the prohibited activities, like riding scooters and such. And along with most of the other countries in the region, they have absolutely no tolerance for drugs. Its not that bad however, as I have heard that neighboring Indonesia will kill you for beating your meat. Thats harsh. And while caning is painful, Im pretty sure its effects last no longer than a month or so. Its not permanent. In my opinion, I dont have much of a problem with executing drug dealers. You might say that Im barbaric, but there couldnt be a better solution. I mean, the problems solved permanently, isnt it? This guy wont ever be dealing or trafficking again, will he? And now that they offed him, the other guys will be much more cautious, and many will back down completely.