April 18, 200422 yr I would take Beltran over Soriano ... soriano just strikes out too much You can build a team around Beltran, the same cannot be said about Soriano
April 18, 200422 yr I would take Beltran over Soriano ... soriano just strikes out too much You can build a team around Beltran, the same cannot be said about Soriano correction, you can build a central team around beltran. Beltran would not be the center of most west or east teams. And a strike out is only a kind of out, but point taken.
April 18, 200422 yr Correction: Strikeout is a type of out, yet can it move runners into scoring position, i.e. a sac fly?
April 18, 200422 yr I would rather have soriano however. Im sure that anyone that follows baseball alot would rather take Soriano over Beltran. I would take Beltran
April 18, 200422 yr Correction: Strikeout is a type of out, yet can it move runners into scoring position, i.e. a sac fly? can a Kout make a double play? well, there's the strike'em out, throw'em out!
April 18, 200422 yr Id take Beltran over Soriano. Old-man skills fade much more quickly. Whereas Beltran even without his speed and HR can still get on base with the walk.
April 18, 200422 yr Beacuse of the postion scarcity I might take Soriano over Beltran. They are about equal offensively, but Soriano's production is rarer in a second baseman. I do agree that Soriano has to learn some plate discipline and could fade faster than Beltran though.
April 19, 200422 yr Beacuse of the postion scarcity I might take Soriano over Beltran. They are about equal offensively, but Soriano's production is rarer in a second baseman. I do agree that Soriano has to learn some plate discipline and could fade faster than Beltran though. I totally agree with this statement. Otherwise i would go with beltran because of the obp.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.