Bush yesteday: "The reason I keep insisting that there was a relationship between Iraq and Saddam and al Qaeda [is] because there was a relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda,"

 

Bush September 18th, 03: "We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the September 11th [attack]..."

 

How god damn gullible is this country?

Extremely.

its absolutly riduclious how many times Bush has said one thing and then the exact opposite a couple months later.

 

 

and people say he was bringing honesty and such to the white house.

 

 

what a farce.

it's like we have al gore in there! but he's not this bad

Most politicians are doing this double speak.

 

They know there isn't any evidence thus far, but they don't want to get caught on the hook if some miraculous discovery is made later.

Fish, this is like Bush saying "a comet is going to hit us in the next six months", taking it back, and then saying it again. Why are we making excuses for such war drumming?

i'm sure they had this in mind the whole time.

 

they would imply it over and over again, yet stop just short of flat-out saying "Saddam and al-Qaeda are in cahoots"

 

so now when they're pressed on it, they fall back on "well we never stated it word-for-word! nah-nah-nah!"

Flip-flop... second guessing... no toughts... vote Bush 2004...

how about the 9/11 commission comes out with a report that Saddam had nothing to do with it and dumbass responded by saying "we never said he did"

Bush yesteday: "The reason I keep insisting that there was a relationship between Iraq and Saddam and al Qaeda [is] because there was a relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda,"

 

Bush September 18th, 03: "We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the September 11th [attack]..."

 

How god damn gullible is this country?

I don't see where these two statements are logically mutually exclusive.

 

Relationship and causality are not the same thing. I was thinking the same thing...