Here we go Round 2.

 

Sorry for the delay.

 

Top 10 move on.

How are the 1961 Yankees not on here (8 All-Stars and a WS champ), but the 1998 Braves (a team that didn't even win the NL pennant) are on here? This is just retarded.

How are the 1961 Yankees not on here (8 All-Stars and a WS champ), but the 1998 Braves (a team that didn't even win the NL pennant) are on here? This is just retarded.

692512[/snapback]

 

Agreed, therefore I refuse to vote.

 

No 97 Marlins?

How are the 1961 Yankees not on here (8 All-Stars and a WS champ), but the 1998 Braves (a team that didn't even win the NL pennant) are on here? This is just retarded.

692512[/snapback]

 

Agreed, therefore I refuse to vote.

 

No 97 Marlins?

692516[/snapback]

 

This was discussed in Round 1.

 

I made the case that the playoffs are a "crapshoot"and someone stated. And a team shouldn't be judged for what they did in a one/two week period versus what they did for the first 6 months of the season.

1961 New York Giants

there's no such thing. Plus the SF Giants weren't that good in 61. 62 is another story...

1961 New York Giants

there's no such thing

692585[/snapback]

 

 

D'oh!

 

:confused

How are the 1961 Yankees not on here (8 All-Stars and a WS champ), but the 1998 Braves (a team that didn't even win the NL pennant) are on here? This is just retarded.

692512[/snapback]

 

Agreed, therefore I refuse to vote.

 

No 97 Marlins?

692516[/snapback]

 

Same here.

 

The 1997 Marlins weren't that great. Certainly not a top 10 team all time.

Why are the 1945 Detroit Tigers not on there?

The Oosios of 1970.

How are the 1961 Yankees not on here (8 All-Stars and a WS champ), but the 1998 Braves (a team that didn't even win the NL pennant) are on here? This is just retarded.

692512[/snapback]

I think by 61 Giants he meant to put 61 Yankees

1 more day of voting

How about 1908 cubs.... LMAO :lol

Last time they won.

big red machine

'98 Yankees

No Brooklyn team?