...what's a moonbat? :confused

"Hard to explain, but you know when you see one"

wikipedia definations:

 

1. "Someone on the extreme edge of whatever their -ism happens to be." (de Havilland )

 

2. "someone who sacrifices sanity for the sake of consistency" (Adriana Cronin)

 

3. "... human whose cerebral cortex has turned to silly putty causing him or her to mentally slide down the evolutionary ladder to the level of a winged rat who is influenced by the moon and wants to suck your blood. Also not-so-affectionately known as a "Democrat"." (www.barking-moonbat.com F.A.Q)

 

4. Not liberals, but leftists. Whereas liberals are patriotic, leftists seek to undermine their national strength. Anti-war protestors, likely to call the US military "nazis," apt to blame the 9-11 attacks on a US government and Zionist conspiracy, are moonbats. Liberals who oppose the war, are not.

 

5. A poster at the liberal/progressive website Democratic Underground.

wikipedia definations:

 

1. "Someone on the extreme edge of whatever their -ism happens to be." (de Havilland )

 

2. "someone who sacrifices sanity for the sake of consistency" (Adriana Cronin)

 

3. "... human whose cerebral cortex has turned to silly putty causing him or her to mentally slide down the evolutionary ladder to the level of a winged rat who is influenced by the moon and wants to suck your blood. Also not-so-affectionately known as a "Democrat"." (www.barking-moonbat.com F.A.Q)

 

4. Not liberals, but leftists. Whereas liberals are patriotic, leftists seek to undermine their national strength. Anti-war protestors, likely to call the US military "nazis," apt to blame the 9-11 attacks on a US government and Zionist conspiracy, are moonbats. Liberals who oppose the war, are not.

 

5. A poster at the liberal/progressive website Democratic Underground.

697534[/snapback]

 

:lol

 

Thanks.

and that thing in my avatar.

 

 

thats a moonbat.

So that qualifies Tonyi as a moonbat. :mischief2

takes one to know one

takes one to know one

698024[/snapback]

I am not a moonbat. I am a religious liberal. So therefore I am not a moonbat. I win. :mischief

I'm not a moonbat either :hat

I'm not a moonbat either :hat

698029[/snapback]

Suuuure you're not.

1. moonbat

Someone on the extreme edge of the political left who has long abandoned fact & logic in the pursuit of spewing their scocialist crapaganda. (ie Al Franken, Michael Moore, and Janeane Garafalo, to name but a few.) Ann Coulter is the absolute antithesis of a moonbat.

Al Gore is a raving moonbat in a suit.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=moonbat&r=f

1.? moonbat

Someone on the extreme edge of the political left who has long abandoned fact & logic in the pursuit of spewing their scocialist crapaganda. (ie Al Franken, Michael Moore, and Janeane Garafalo, to name but a few.) Ann Coulter is the absolute antithesis of a moonbat.

Al Gore is a raving moonbat in a suit.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=moonbat&r=f

698047[/snapback]

Anyone who can defend Ann Coulter as not being a wacko is not using their brain.

Pwned!

1. moonbat

Someone on the extreme edge of the political left who has long abandoned fact & logic in the pursuit of spewing their scocialist crapaganda. (ie Al Franken, Michael Moore, and Janeane Garafalo, to name but a few.) Ann Coulter is the absolute antithesis of a moonbat.

Al Gore is a raving moonbat in a suit.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=moonbat&r=f

698047[/snapback]

Anyone who can defend Ann Coulter as not being a wacko is not using their brain.

698099[/snapback]

So let me get this straight:

 

Al Franken= Moonbat, while Ann Coulter is a great person who loves the earth and all of the people that inhabit it.

 

Excuse me while I throw up. :banghead

Well, Coulter is the right-wing equivalent.

Anyone who can defend Ann Coulter as not being a wacko is not using their brain.

 

You still don't understand her do you, even after I posted her Time mag quotes after the election.

 

Coulter isn't necessarily a true believer. Her "job" as she put it, was to provoke the far left. When the far left is activated, it helps republicans. The left swallows the bait every time. :plain

 

This is quite a different situation than the far left moonbats who accomplish only self -destruction.

 

It all comes down to what I've said previously - the far left can't get any middle, or otherwise non-voting drag by being vocal because the troops are FULLY activated on the left/dem side. The only thing the far left can provoke is an awakening of Nixon's "silent majority"

 

Just look at the demographics of liberal vs conservative. ~15% of the country considers itself liberal, ~30% conservative. Plot the distributions on a normal curve and its readily apparent why liberal activism helps the right.

 

Alas, leftists in denial refuse to see any of these hard demographic realities and are doomed to repeated failures when they keep misreading the electorate.

698130[/snapback]

 

If the tactic of provoking worked, I think that Democrats have a lot more provokers on their side than do Republicans - so why aren't they winning elections?

Well, Coulter is the right-wing equivalent.

698126[/snapback]

Yup.