Jump to content

Man Arrested For Spitting On Jane Fonda


Accord

Recommended Posts

KANSAS CITY, Mo. --

Police said they arrested a man for spitting on two-time Academy Award-winning actress Jane Fonda during a book-signing stop in Kansas City Tuesday night.

 

Fonda, 67, spoke at Unity Temple, in The Plaza shopping district, about her new best-selling book, "My Life So Far," and her new movie with Jennifer Lopez called "Monster-In-Law."

 

At about 9 p.m., police said, a man who had been waiting in line for about 90 minutes, passed a book to Fonda and then spit a large amount of tobacco juice into her face. ( awesome)

 

They said the man then ran away and was taken into custody by off-duty officers, who were providing security for the event.

 

Fonda declined to prosecute the man.

 

Michael A. Smith, 54, was arrested and charged with disorderly conduct, which is a city charge.

 

In 1972, Fonda was photographed sitting in a North Vietnamese anti-aircraft tank. About her involvement in the Vietnam War, Fonda has apologized for her anti-aircraft tank photo. She has called it an incredible lapse in judgment.

 

Hopefully the judge will be a Vietnam Vet :D .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What ever happend to freedom of speech? :whistle :shifty

751053[/snapback]

 

 

When you go and pose sitting in an enemy anti-air battery, bash your contry, give the sign of victory to the enemy, and pose alongside American POW's it's no longer freedom of speech, it becomes treason. Maybe you should mention that to your communist teachers in school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What ever happend to freedom of speech? :whistle :shifty

751053[/snapback]

 

 

When you go and pose sitting in an enemy anti-air battery, bash your contry, give the sign of victory to the enemy, and pose alongside American POW's it's no longer freedom of speech, it becomes treason. Maybe you should mention that to your communist teachers in school.

751071[/snapback]

 

 

 

Maybe I'll say this just for you....

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'M ON THE SIDE OF THE GUY WHO SPIT ON HER FACE. :mad

 

My Dad is a Vietnam vet, so who's side do you think I'm going to be on??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What ever happend to freedom of speech?? :whistle ? :shifty

751053[/snapback]

 

 

When you go and pose sitting in an enemy anti-air battery, bash your contry, give the sign of victory to the enemy, and pose alongside American POW's it's no longer freedom of speech, it becomes treason. Maybe you should mention that to your communist teachers in school.

751071[/snapback]

 

 

 

Maybe I'll say this just for you....

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'M ON THE SIDE OF THE GUY WHO SPIT ON HER FACE. :mad

 

My Dad is a Vietnam vet, so who's side do you think I'm going to be on??

751080[/snapback]

 

 

 

Sorry man, just wanted to be sure you knew what she had actually done. You never know with some of the people who post here.... :thumbup

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What ever happend to freedom of speech? :whistle :shifty

751053[/snapback]

 

 

When you go and pose sitting in an enemy anti-air battery, bash your contry, give the sign of victory to the enemy, and pose alongside American POW's it's no longer freedom of speech, it becomes treason. Maybe you should mention that to your communist teachers in school.

751071[/snapback]

 

 

 

Maybe I'll say this just for you....

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'M ON THE SIDE OF THE GUY WHO SPIT ON HER FACE. :mad

 

My Dad is a Vietnam vet, so who's side do you think I'm going to be on??

751080[/snapback]

 

 

 

Sorry man, just wanted to be sure you knew what she had actually done. You never know with some of the people who post here.... :thumbup

751085[/snapback]

 

 

No sweat :thumbup Maybe I should have worded it better but I meant to say its his freedom of speech to express himself and spit on her. Hence, he should have been arrested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Fritz

What ever happend to freedom of speech? :whistle :shifty

751053[/snapback]

 

 

When you go and pose sitting in an enemy anti-air battery, bash your contry, give the sign of victory to the enemy, and pose alongside American POW's it's no longer freedom of speech, it becomes treason. Maybe you should mention that to your communist teachers in school.

751071[/snapback]

 

 

 

Maybe I'll say this just for you....

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'M ON THE SIDE OF THE GUY WHO SPIT ON HER FACE. :mad

 

My Dad is a Vietnam vet, so who's side do you think I'm going to be on??

751080[/snapback]

 

 

 

Sorry man, just wanted to be sure you knew what she had actually done. You never know with some of the people who post here.... :thumbup

751085[/snapback]

 

 

No sweat :thumbup Maybe I should have worded it better but I meant to say its his freedom of speech to express himself and spit on her. Hence, he should have been arrested.

751193[/snapback]

Spitting on someone is not exercising freedom of speech.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What ever happend to freedom of speech? :whistle :shifty

751053[/snapback]

 

 

When you go and pose sitting in an enemy anti-air battery, bash your contry, give the sign of victory to the enemy, and pose alongside American POW's it's no longer freedom of speech, it becomes treason. Maybe you should mention that to your communist teachers in school.

751071[/snapback]

 

 

 

Maybe I'll say this just for you....

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'M ON THE SIDE OF THE GUY WHO SPIT ON HER FACE. :mad

 

My Dad is a Vietnam vet, so who's side do you think I'm going to be on??

751080[/snapback]

 

 

 

Sorry man, just wanted to be sure you knew what she had actually done. You never know with some of the people who post here.... :thumbup

751085[/snapback]

 

 

No sweat :thumbup Maybe I should have worded it better but I meant to say its his freedom of speech to express himself and spit on her. Hence, he should have been arrested.

751193[/snapback]

Spitting on someone is not exercising freedom of speech.

751198[/snapback]

 

 

 

Maybe not, but like you said she definately deserved it.,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spitting on someone is really disrespectful, but I think she is certainly deserving of it.

751190[/snapback]

 

Say she deserved it or that you would have done it too, but it's 2nd-degree (1st-degree? I mean, it looks like it was premeditated) battery nonetheless. So would you risk a felony conviction to do this?

 

Nevermind conservatives were just crowing about pie-throwing at Bill Kristol and Pat Buchanan (although I would also have to say that they deserved it, even if the act were a felony).

 

And Chewie, the basic premise in your sig is wrong (dividing (y-x) from both sides yields undetermined fractions of 2/0 and 1/0, because y-x=0).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Fritz

Spitting on someone is really disrespectful, but I think she is certainly deserving of it.

751190[/snapback]

 

Say she deserved it or that you would have done it too, but it's 2nd-degree (1st-degree? I mean, it looks like it was premeditated) battery nonetheless. So would you risk a felony conviction to do this?

751912[/snapback]

Hell no, I wouldn't have done it because I have a bit of class, but I can certainly see where the guy is coming from. No way would I want a criminal record for spitting on some dumbass celebrity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spitting on someone is really disrespectful, but I think she is certainly deserving of it.

751190[/snapback]

 

Say she deserved it or that you would have done it too, but it's 2nd-degree (1st-degree? I mean, it looks like it was premeditated) battery nonetheless. So would you risk a felony conviction to do this?

751912[/snapback]

 

If I was a Vietnam veteran that was over there fighting for my country and watching my buddies die one by one while this bitch was committing treason, a felony conviction would be a small price to pay for the satisfaction of being able to spit in the face of a traitor.

 

She deserves a lot worse than being spit on, let her rot in Gitmo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Chewie, the basic premise in your sig is wrong (dividing (y-x) from both sides yields undetermined fractions of 2/0 and 1/0, because y-x=0).

 

 

Bingo. :mischief

751934[/snapback]

Hence the "don't drink and derive" part. Identifying the error in that has been a question on a few Mu Alpha Thetea tests in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...