Ramp Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 who I happened to pick as my NL Roy is hitting .470 this year I dont remember the last time someone had such a high BA this far into April Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nugget Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 Got him on my fantasy team! go me! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SongInTheAir Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 Got him on my fantasy team! go me! 753045[/snapback] word, me too! :thumbup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flasportsfan88 Posted April 25, 2005 Share Posted April 25, 2005 Got him on my fantasy team! go me! 753045[/snapback] word, me too! :thumbup 753198[/snapback] Word, me also Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MVPosey Posted April 25, 2005 Share Posted April 25, 2005 who I happened to pick as my NL Roy is hitting .470 this year I dont remember the last time someone had such a high BA this far into April 753041[/snapback] um... Barmes isn't a rookie according to MLB rules, therefore he is not eligible for ROTY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramp Posted April 25, 2005 Author Share Posted April 25, 2005 who I happened to pick as my NL Roy is hitting .470 this year I dont remember the last time someone had such a high BA this far into April 753041[/snapback] um... Barmes isn't a rookie according to MLB rules, therefore he is not eligible for ROTY 754473[/snapback] odd... espn has him as a rookie link Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MVPosey Posted April 25, 2005 Share Posted April 25, 2005 who I happened to pick as my NL Roy is hitting .470 this year I dont remember the last time someone had such a high BA this far into April 753041[/snapback] um... Barmes isn't a rookie according to MLB rules, therefore he is not eligible for ROTY 754473[/snapback] odd... espn has him as a rookie link 754564[/snapback] they had Lew Ford as a rookie last year too... MLB rules state that in order to be considered a rookie, you have to had spent less than 45 days on a ML roster prior to the season... 2004: 35 days 2003: 21 days totale: 56 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramp Posted April 25, 2005 Author Share Posted April 25, 2005 who I happened to pick as my NL Roy is hitting .470 this year I dont remember the last time someone had such a high BA this far into April 753041[/snapback] um... Barmes isn't a rookie according to MLB rules, therefore he is not eligible for ROTY 754473[/snapback] odd... espn has him as a rookie link 754564[/snapback] they had Lew Ford as a rookie last year too... MLB rules state that in order to be considered a rookie, you have to had spent less than 45 days on a ML roster prior to the season... 2004: 35 days 2003: 21 days totale: 56 754566[/snapback] it might be 45 days in one year... here is an article on Barmes that says he is a rookie rockies.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purewinners Posted April 25, 2005 Share Posted April 25, 2005 i picked him 23rd overall in a 28 man roster league....he was my pick for NL rookie of the year even before the season started. Now that Nomar is gone, 'CLIT' Barmes tooke over the SS spot....i hope he continues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flasportsfan88 Posted April 26, 2005 Share Posted April 26, 2005 i picked him 23rd overall in a 28 man roster league....he was my pick for NL rookie of the year even before the season started. Now that Nomar is gone, 'CLIT' Barmes tooke over the SS spot....i hope he continues. 754568[/snapback] Wow same here, after Garciaparra went down i picked up Barmes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.