rorod Posted July 9, 2005 Share Posted July 9, 2005 isnt it wierd that only no names are getting caught? do you think mlb is trying to protect its stars? because unfortunately the only way this drug policy will gain credibility is if some big star gets caught. until that happens the clean player's names wont be cleared Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Dubya Bush Posted July 9, 2005 Share Posted July 9, 2005 isnt it wierd that only no names are getting caught? do you think mlb is trying to protect its stars? because unfortunately the only way this drug policy will gain credibility is if some big star gets caught. until that happens the clean player's names wont be cleared 847714[/snapback] Maybe the stars are off the roids. There have been a few bust here and there. But MLB will most likely cover-up if a huge star is caught. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Guapo Posted July 9, 2005 Share Posted July 9, 2005 isnt it wierd that only no names are getting caught? do you think mlb is trying to protect its stars? because unfortunately the only way this drug policy will gain credibility is if some big star gets caught. until that happens the clean player's names wont be cleared 847714[/snapback] Maybe the stars are off the roids. There have been a few bust here and there. But MLB will most likely cover-up if a huge star is caught. 847721[/snapback] They have covered it up....baseball can't take another big hit, protecting it's star's is a priority......Alot of #'s are down this year....coincidence....think not Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Passion Posted July 9, 2005 Share Posted July 9, 2005 isnt it wierd that only no names are getting caught? do you think mlb is trying to protect its stars? because unfortunately the only way this drug policy will gain credibility is if some big star gets caught. until that happens the clean player's names wont be cleared 847714[/snapback] Maybe the stars are off the roids. There have been a few bust here and there. But MLB will most likely cover-up if a huge star is caught. 847721[/snapback] They have covered it up....baseball can't take another big hit, protecting it's star's is a priority......Alot of #'s are down this year....coincidence....think not 847730[/snapback] People still having 27 HRS and 80 RBIS and batting .370 at the break is not a drop off... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madman81 Posted July 9, 2005 Share Posted July 9, 2005 Alex Sanchez is not a no name. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beinfest4Prez Posted July 9, 2005 Share Posted July 9, 2005 Juan Rincon isn't a no name either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimeWrecker Posted July 9, 2005 Share Posted July 9, 2005 ive got the answer for u buddy.... The best steroids are undetecable. The biggest stars can afford these drugs. This puts them out of the spotlight, because tests will show up negitave. Lower levcel stars or 'no names' get the less expensive drugs, and they are detected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rorod Posted July 10, 2005 Author Share Posted July 10, 2005 thanx buddy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rorod Posted July 10, 2005 Author Share Posted July 10, 2005 Juan Rincon isn't a no name either. 847814[/snapback] your kidding right?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rorod Posted July 10, 2005 Author Share Posted July 10, 2005 Alex Sanchez is not a no name. 847802[/snapback] when you ask someone who is the best rays outfielder. he isnt even # 1, id say crawford or baldelli before i even think sanchez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Passion Posted July 10, 2005 Share Posted July 10, 2005 Alex Sanchez is not a no name. 847802[/snapback] when you ask someone who is the best rays outfielder. he isnt even # 1, id say crawford or baldelli before i even think sanchez 848754[/snapback] Thats because he isn't a D-Ray anymore.... :whistle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimeWrecker Posted July 10, 2005 Share Posted July 10, 2005 Alex Sanchez is not a no name. 847802[/snapback] when you ask someone who is the best rays outfielder. he isnt even # 1, id say crawford or baldelli before i even think sanchez 848754[/snapback] Thats because he isn't a D-Ray anymore.... :whistle 848790[/snapback] yup, the stoids made him a GIANT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MVPosey Posted July 10, 2005 Share Posted July 10, 2005 Alex Sanchez is not a no name. 847802[/snapback] he's less than that...the guy is complete garbage...i don't know if there is a worse player in all of baseball Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Moneyball Posted July 10, 2005 Share Posted July 10, 2005 Alex Sanchez is not a no name. 847802[/snapback] he's less than that...the guy is complete garbage...i don't know if there is a worse player in all of baseball 849057[/snapback] This is a change. By now I thought you'd be comparing him to Miguel Cabrera. :plain Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rferry Posted July 10, 2005 Share Posted July 10, 2005 Think about it. Borderline major leaguers and latin players were more likely to be users. They had much to gain at very little risk to their careers. They're also might not afford the designer steroids and masking agents that the stars might. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.