Junior Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20...sp&c_id=mlb DENVER -- The Colorado Rockies' method of storing baseballs is fast growing from a curiosity to standard operating procedure in the Majors. Since 2002, the Rockies have kept baseballs in an atmosphere-controlled climate, known locally as "the humidor," to keep them from shrinking, hardening and losing friction in Colorado's unique environment. Major League Baseball stopped short of mandating all teams adopt such an apparatus, but the move toward standardization will continue in 2007. All 30 clubs will be keeping their baseballs in temperature-controlled settings. In another move toward ensuring that balls stay at specifications set by manufacturer Rawlings, Major League Baseball has adopted a shelf-life rule, MLB executive vice president, baseball operations Jimmie Lee Solomon said Thursday. "We did send out a directive that teams are to use current year-purchased balls, not balls from previous years -- they may use those in batting practice, but not in games," Solomon said. As for storage, Solomon said some clubs have humidity controls for the area where balls are stored, but he did not know how many. Much of the focus on baseball storage is on the Rockies, who began operating the humidor in 2002. Before then, runs and home runs were at an off-the-charts pace at Coors Field. The prevailing theory was that the increase was due, partly at least, to the mile-high dry climate of Coors Field in Denver. Whenever there is a run of high-scoring games, the Rockies are questioned about how they're operating the humidor, but Solomon said what the Rockies are doing "will be the industry standard in the not-too-distant future." As has been the case for the last five seasons, the Rockies must file weekly reports with Major League Baseball, and MLB operations will travel to Coors for periodic checks. Solomon said the Rockies are monitored more than any other club. Solomon called the monitoring of a climate's effects on baseballs, and in turn how the ball performs in games, "an emerging science." But the eventual goal is to make sure that the baseball in all venues stays at Rawlings' specifications, presumably with all teams storing them in a standard chamber. "It's going to take time -- it's not a cheap apparatus," Solomon said. The one at Coors reportedly cost $15,000, not counting the cost of operating it and filing paperwork. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FlummoxedLummox Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 Maybe we'll see fewer fly balls die at the warning track. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yankeefan21 Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20...sp&c_id=mlb "It's going to take time -- it's not a cheap apparatus," Solomon said. The one at Coors reportedly cost $15,000, not counting the cost of operating it and filing paperwork. What's $15,000 to an MLB ballclub? They spend more than that on jock straps in a given season! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreshFish Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20...sp&c_id=mlb "It's going to take time -- it's not a cheap apparatus," Solomon said. The one at Coors reportedly cost $15,000, not counting the cost of operating it and filing paperwork. What's $15,000 to an MLB ballclub? They spend more than that on jock straps in a given season! The Marlins owner and their President (aka "ironman") will now say that they have to cut payroll again, because operational expenses and league requirements are going up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mauer7 Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20...sp&c_id=mlb "It's going to take time -- it's not a cheap apparatus," Solomon said. The one at Coors reportedly cost $15,000, not counting the cost of operating it and filing paperwork. What's $15,000 to an MLB ballclub? They spend more than that on jock straps in a given season! The Marlins owner and their President (aka "ironman") will now say that they have to cut payroll again, because operational expenses and league requirements are going up :lol ..sad but probably true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pierremvp1 Posted February 10, 2007 Share Posted February 10, 2007 If they now make the Marlins keep their balls in a humidor then.......... . . . seriously....the low sea level/high humidity here could be having an effect on the balls as strong or stronger than the Colorado climate of high sea level/low humidity. If such a move was mandated for the Marlins balls in play at Joe Robbie Stadium, then this could turn out to be the single most important event of the off season for our team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Das Texan Posted February 10, 2007 Share Posted February 10, 2007 http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20...sp&c_id=mlb "It's going to take time -- it's not a cheap apparatus," Solomon said. The one at Coors reportedly cost $15,000, not counting the cost of operating it and filing paperwork. What's $15,000 to an MLB ballclub? They spend more than that on jock straps in a given season! I'm sure we buy our jockstraps used or make the players provide their own. 15k to the cheapest ownership group is a lot, and thats just for the humidor. Gotta pay the operational costs for it too you know! Thats gotta be another grand or two in a season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTMarlinsfan Posted February 10, 2007 Share Posted February 10, 2007 i heard that they have to be kept at 70 degrees and 50% humidity...would the Marlins have to use a DEhumidifier? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pierremvp1 Posted February 10, 2007 Share Posted February 10, 2007 i heard that they have to be kept at 70 degrees and 50% humidity...would the Marlins have to use a DEhumidifier? I would say that here in South Florida they would have to use a dehumiifier and one that was cooled or air conditioned in some way. This could, if mandated, have a big effect on the game here in the South Florida summer. Likely the pitching would have the greatest change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTMarlinsfan Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 i heard that they have to be kept at 70 degrees and 50% humidity...would the Marlins have to use a DEhumidifier? I would say that here in South Florida they would have to use a dehumiifier and one that was cooled or air conditioned in some way. This could, if mandated, have a big effect on the game here in the South Florida summer. Likely the pitching would have the greatest change. while it would have a big effect, DS is still a very hard park. A triples a triple if its hit to the right spot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.