August 13, 200719 yr Offensively, I agree that Treanor would not put up those same numbers if starting him everyday, but the fact that he will give you a quality at bat at least a reasonable percentage of the time deserves some credit. Olivo just looks overmatched everytime he is in the box unless he gets a fastball down the middle or a lefty misses with a slider. Overmatched Guy (Olivo) has a higher career OPS than Quality At Bat Guy (Treanor). Overmatched Guy also has the higher career RISP OPS than Quality At Bat Guy. Career OBP of Treanor though is much higher, which is in actuality much more telling of a quality AB than OPS as a whole. Treanor does get on base more often but overall Olivo is the "better" hitter. Except that he's not the better hitter. Except for last season, he's never demonstrated the ability to do anything at the plate other than suck.
August 13, 200719 yr Can someone explain why Treanor is better at handling pitchers? I admit that Tommy and Rich going gaga over Treanor talking to the pitcher in the dugout between innings didn't convince me. The performance of pitchers while Treanor is catching is better than when Olivo is catching. I can't tell you why he is better, but it is easy to demonstrate that he is.
August 13, 200719 yr Offensively, I agree that Treanor would not put up those same numbers if starting him everyday, but the fact that he will give you a quality at bat at least a reasonable percentage of the time deserves some credit. Olivo just looks overmatched everytime he is in the box unless he gets a fastball down the middle or a lefty misses with a slider. Overmatched Guy (Olivo) has a higher career OPS than Quality At Bat Guy (Treanor). Overmatched Guy also has the higher career RISP OPS than Quality At Bat Guy. Career OBP of Treanor though is much higher, which is in actuality much more telling of a quality AB than OPS as a whole. Treanor does get on base more often but overall Olivo is the "better" hitter. Except that he's not the better hitter. Except for last season, he's never demonstrated the ability to do anything at the plate other than suck. And Treanor has a career .715 OPS in the minors. over like 11 seasons. He's an awful hitter. Can someone explain why Treanor is better at handling pitchers? I admit that Tommy and Rich going gaga over Treanor talking to the pitcher in the dugout between innings didn't convince me. The performance of pitchers while Treanor is catching is better than when Olivo is catching. I can't tell you why he is better, but it is easy to demonstrate that he is. I would argue that it's probably just coincidence.
August 13, 200719 yr Offensively, I agree that Treanor would not put up those same numbers if starting him everyday, but the fact that he will give you a quality at bat at least a reasonable percentage of the time deserves some credit. Olivo just looks overmatched everytime he is in the box unless he gets a fastball down the middle or a lefty misses with a slider. Overmatched Guy (Olivo) has a higher career OPS than Quality At Bat Guy (Treanor). Overmatched Guy also has the higher career RISP OPS than Quality At Bat Guy. Career OBP of Treanor though is much higher, which is in actuality much more telling of a quality AB than OPS as a whole. Treanor does get on base more often but overall Olivo is the "better" hitter. Except that he's not the better hitter. Except for last season, he's never demonstrated the ability to do anything at the plate other than suck. His career OPS is higher and to me that makes him the "better" hitter. Both of them suck but one of them sucks a little more.
August 13, 200719 yr Can someone explain why Treanor is better at handling pitchers? I admit that Tommy and Rich going gaga over Treanor talking to the pitcher in the dugout between innings didn't convince me. The performance of pitchers while Treanor is catching is better than when Olivo is catching. I can't tell you why he is better, but it is easy to demonstrate that he is. Their CERA is about the same. I know CERA is the worst stat ever but it's the only one I know of. If you can quantify or prove how Treanor handles the pitchers better I would love to read it.
August 13, 200719 yr Offensively, I agree that Treanor would not put up those same numbers if starting him everyday, but the fact that he will give you a quality at bat at least a reasonable percentage of the time deserves some credit. Olivo just looks overmatched everytime he is in the box unless he gets a fastball down the middle or a lefty misses with a slider. Overmatched Guy (Olivo) has a higher career OPS than Quality At Bat Guy (Treanor). Overmatched Guy also has the higher career RISP OPS than Quality At Bat Guy. Career OBP of Treanor though is much higher, which is in actuality much more telling of a quality AB than OPS as a whole. Treanor does get on base more often but overall Olivo is the "better" hitter. Except that he's not the better hitter. Except for last season, he's never demonstrated the ability to do anything at the plate other than suck. His career OPS is higher and to me that makes him the "better" hitter. Both of them suck but one of them sucks a little more. But see, this biggest problem with OPS is that it puts one point of SLG at the same value of OBP. One point of OBP is 3, 4, or even 5 times more valuable than a point of SLG%. I have to run so I can't do the calculations right now, but just looking at Treanor's OBP and Olivo's I'm willing to bet Treanor is as good or even better than Olivo.
August 13, 200719 yr Offensively, I agree that Treanor would not put up those same numbers if starting him everyday, but the fact that he will give you a quality at bat at least a reasonable percentage of the time deserves some credit. Olivo just looks overmatched everytime he is in the box unless he gets a fastball down the middle or a lefty misses with a slider. Overmatched Guy (Olivo) has a higher career OPS than Quality At Bat Guy (Treanor). Overmatched Guy also has the higher career RISP OPS than Quality At Bat Guy. Career OBP of Treanor though is much higher, which is in actuality much more telling of a quality AB than OPS as a whole. Treanor does get on base more often but overall Olivo is the "better" hitter. From what I've seen, the only thing Olivo brings to the plate over Treanor is more power, but I don't think that makes him a better hittter. Oh, sorry, "better" hitter.
August 14, 200719 yr Willingham shouldn't even be considered a catcher anymore. I still can't bring myself to consider him a LFer. He does a okay job in LF. The past season and a half I would have argued all day long on this. But he is becoming much better out there. I no longer hold my breath when I see a fly ball head his direction. He has been putting himself in better position to back up OF plays, wich is something that goes pretty much unnoticed. I think his weakness is in judging balls around the wall, not taking them off the wall but judging how far up the wall and how near to the wall he is. I think some of those balls he lets hit and then fields could be caught. But he is definetly getting better defensively.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.