djm305 Posted May 14, 2008 Share Posted May 14, 2008 So I spent some time today looking over some stats. You guys should look at this before condemning Treanor.... The following dates are ALL the games Treanor has started this year. Aside from APR 17 when we got shutout 8-0 we have NOT been blown out when he starts. He calls a good game and I think that is Overlooked way too often when evaluating him. Opponents have only scored more than 6 runs in 3 of the games he has started this year. See Below. MAR 31 L 7-2 APR 01 W 5-4 APR 04 W 5-4 APR 05 W 7-3 APR 07 W 10-7 APR 09 W 10-4 APR 10 W 4-3 APR 13 L 5-1 APR 17 L 8-0 APR 20 W 6-1 APR 22 L 3-2 APR 27 W 3-2 MAY 04 W 10-3 MAY 08 W 7-2 MAY 09 W 7-3 MAY 10 W 11-0 MAY 13 L 5-3 Total W-L = 12-5 Runs RS-RA = 93-64 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retro_Marlins25 Posted May 14, 2008 Share Posted May 14, 2008 This is very misleading.You can thank our offense because in several wins they gave up quite a few runs.It is also to early for this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rabbethan Posted May 14, 2008 Share Posted May 14, 2008 This is very misleading.You can thank our offense because in several wins they gave up quite a few runs.It is also to early for this. It's not that misleading at all. His Catcher ERA is 3.58 while Rabelo's is 4.18. That said, I think CERA is a crappy stat. But I would have to agree to starting Treanor. He is hitting better, he's calling better games in my eyes, and his D is pretty good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retro_Marlins25 Posted May 14, 2008 Share Posted May 14, 2008 This is very misleading.You can thank our offense because in several wins they gave up quite a few runs.It is also to early for this. It's not that misleading at all. His Catcher ERA is 3.58 while Rabelo's is 4.18. That said, I think CERA is a crappy stat. But I would have to agree to starting Treanor. He is hitting better, he's calling better games in my eyes, and his D is pretty good. It means NOTHING.Very misleading. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbob1313 Posted May 14, 2008 Share Posted May 14, 2008 Yeah, CERA is dumb. Sorry, Rab. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rabbethan Posted May 14, 2008 Share Posted May 14, 2008 This is very misleading.You can thank our offense because in several wins they gave up quite a few runs.It is also to early for this. It's not that misleading at all. His Catcher ERA is 3.58 while Rabelo's is 4.18. That said, I think CERA is a crappy stat. But I would have to agree to starting Treanor. He is hitting better, he's calling better games in my eyes, and his D is pretty good. It means NOTHING.Very misleading. A second ago what was misleading because we scored runs in the games he played. Now it's that CERA is misleading because we don't give up many runs when he plays. I think it would only be misleading if all of Treanor's numbers this year weren't better than Rabelo's numbers, both on offense and defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rabbethan Posted May 14, 2008 Share Posted May 14, 2008 Yeah, CERA is dumb. Sorry, Rab. Didn't I say in my own post that CERA sucks? I was just trying to explain what djm was saying. Retro said that we won those games because we put up tons of runs when Treanor started, even though it was more because we gave up an average of less than 4 runs in those games. Come on guys, read. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Godfather Posted May 14, 2008 Share Posted May 14, 2008 I'm just glad Miguel Olivo isn't starting. Anything is an improvement over him. Worst starting player for the Marlins in the last 10 years? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Out of the Past Posted May 15, 2008 Share Posted May 15, 2008 I was a Treanor basher but I've come around. The guy is an amazing game caller who saves twice as many runs with his game calling as Hanley creates with his bat. He also runs really hard on home runs and can hit bloopers and choppers with the best of them. Screw Hanley and lock-up Treanor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marlins2003 Posted May 15, 2008 Share Posted May 15, 2008 I was a Treanor basher but I've come around. The guy is an amazing game caller who saves twice as many runs with his game calling as Hanley creates with his bat. He also runs really hard on home runs and can hit bloopers and choppers with the best of them. Screw Hanley and lock-up Treanor. And they say a leopard can't change its spots... :brigginbounce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marlinsno1 Posted May 15, 2008 Share Posted May 15, 2008 Plus, he's got that porn stache going. I'd start him just for that alone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djm305 Posted May 15, 2008 Author Share Posted May 15, 2008 Plus, he's got that porn stache going. I'd start him just for that alone. He shaved that off 2 games ago Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hivoltg Posted May 15, 2008 Share Posted May 15, 2008 I'm just glad Miguel Olivo isn't starting. Anything is an improvement over him. Worst starting player for the Marlins in the last 10 years? Worse than Castro? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Out of the Past Posted May 15, 2008 Share Posted May 15, 2008 I'm just glad Miguel Olivo isn't starting. Anything is an improvement over him. Worst starting player for the Marlins in the last 10 years? Worse than Castro? Castro was the starter for about one month and was injured while doing it so I would leve him out of this discussion. Dunwoody, Lowell, Zaun, CJ, Owens, Redmond and Gonzalez had seasons just as bad or worse as Olivo's '07 season. Olivo was okay in '06. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marlinsno1 Posted May 15, 2008 Share Posted May 15, 2008 Plus, he's got that porn stache going. I'd start him just for that alone. He shaved that off 2 games ago Was that before the start of the Reds series or after the first game of it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.