Jump to content

Marlins explore deal's.


G.C.0806
 Share

Recommended Posts

Marlins explore possible deals

By Joe Frisaro / MLB.com

 

 

 

Javy Lopez (left) may be a player targeted by the Marlins' front office. (Ryan Remiorz/AP)

 

 

 

NEW ORLEANS -- Smart spending enabled the Marlins to put together a World Series championship team.

Marlins management heads to the Winter Meetings this weekend hopeful of duplicating their 2003 success.

 

"We're going to follow up on ideas and we're going to be open to new ideas," general manager Admin Beinfest said.

 

But Beinfest cautions that just because the Marlins are noted for wheeling-and-dealing in the past doesn't necessarily mean they will complete any blockbuster moves in New Orleans.

 

"There really is only two times that everybody in the league is together, the GM meetings [in November], and the Winter Meetings," Beinfest said. "We're going to see what's going on."

 

Right now there is a lot of speculation of what the Marlins may be prepared to do. The team is exploring whether it is possible to sign either catcher Javy Lopez or outfielder Vladimir Guerrero.

 

Lopez may be receptive to an offer similar to what catcher Ivan Rodriguez recently turned down, two-years for $16 million with an option for a third year that would up the package to $24 million.

 

Guerrero, meanwhile, will be more costly. Both sides share a past history. Beinfest and a number of other front office personnel used to work for the Expos.

 

Beinfest declined comment on specific players.

 

In order to sign a high-priced free agent, however, the Marlins would have to be creative. Also, signing a big-name player could come at the expense of other players.

 

Owner Jeffrey Loria has given Beinfest a $60 million payroll range.

 

Beinfest did say the Marlins are in the market for relief help, particularly a closer. Reportedly, there is strong interest in Armando Benitez.

 

Already, a number of quality relievers have changed teams. In recent days, Tim Worrell signed with the Phillies, strengthening their improved bullpen that added closer Billy Wagner in November.

 

Asked if there still are quality relievers on the market, Beinfest emphatically says, "yes."

 

"I'm confident enough that we'll be able to add a quality player," he said.

 

Over the past few days, the Marlins have been focused on their arbitration-eligible players. Their list includes, shortstop Alex Gonzalez, pitchers Brad Penny, A.J. Burnett, Carl Pavano, Mark Redman, Braden Looper, catcher Ramon Castro and right fielder Juan Encarnacion.

 

Encarnacion is now expected back. And there is a chance the team will make a multiyear offer to Gonzalez, which would mean the entire infield would be signed for more than one season.

 

The Marlins promise to be active at the Winter Meetings. They could surprise by making a big splash with a high-profile signing. But that is not a given.

 

"We are always looking to improve," Beinfest said.

 

But they will do so by spending smartly to remain within their budget.

 

Joe Frisaro is a reporter for MLB.com. This story was not subject to the approval of Major League Baseball or its clubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Encarnacion is now expected back.

 

Wow, that's new. I've never heard anything other than Enc. not returning next year. Well, if we do offer him arbitration that pretty much ends the Vlad talk. wow, that is a shock.... but doesnt mean the end for Vlad.... depends how much Enc gets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Encarnacion is now expected back.

 

Wow, that's new. I've never heard anything other than Enc. not returning next year. Well, if we do offer him arbitration that pretty much ends the Vlad talk. wow, that is a shock.... but doesnt mean the end for Vlad.... depends how much Enc gets you saying that Encarnacion would be on the bench?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he does return. Maybe we can go after Javy then.

 

Pierre

Castillo

Cabs

Lowell

Lopez

Carny

Conine

Gonzalez

 

Not a bad lineup. But if we sign him back I dont think he will go anywhere. This is not the NBA where there are sign and trade deals.

 

But in the end I dont think he will be back but you never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am perplexed by Enc being back. I think that may have been a mistype in the article and should read 'not' instead of 'now'. Funny, this is the same thing I do with ancient Greek and Latin texts....

 

But the idea of Enc being back is too foreign to me. Is it because of Fudge leaving? If that is the case, then why the hub-bub over Vlad? Seems that there is a possible deal going to be made in the future - if we sign Enc, look for him to be moved just like Ramp said. I wouldnt be surprised if we dealt him and say, Redman to another team. But I still think that is a misprint...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am perplexed by Enc being back. I think that may have been a mistype in the article and should read 'not' instead of 'now'. Funny, this is the same thing I do with ancient Greek and Latin texts....

 

But the idea of Enc being back is too foreign to me. Is it because of Fudge leaving? If that is the case, then why the hub-bub over Vlad? Seems that there is a possible deal going to be made in the future - if we sign Enc, look for him to be moved just like Ramp said. I wouldnt be surprised if we dealt him and say, Redman to another team. But I still think that is a misprint...

Encarnacion won't be back unless something wierd happens, he just costs to much for the team. thats where Vlad comes in with creative contract number two on the offseason for the Mahlins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am perplexed by Enc being back. I think that may have been a mistype in the article and should read 'not' instead of 'now'. Funny, this is the same thing I do with ancient Greek and Latin texts....

 

But the idea of Enc being back is too foreign to me. Is it because of Fudge leaving? If that is the case, then why the hub-bub over Vlad? Seems that there is a possible deal going to be made in the future - if we sign Enc, look for him to be moved just like Ramp said. I wouldnt be surprised if we dealt him and say, Redman to another team. But I still think that is a misprint...

That's the only way this make sense. Encarnacion isn't coming back if he goes through arbitration, but maybe this means that Choi is not our first-baseman next year; Conine's job to lose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am perplexed by Enc being back. I think that may have been a mistype in the article and should read 'not' instead of 'now'. Funny, this is the same thing I do with ancient Greek and Latin texts....

 

But the idea of Enc being back is too foreign to me. Is it because of Fudge leaving? If that is the case, then why the hub-bub over Vlad? Seems that there is a possible deal going to be made in the future - if we sign Enc, look for him to be moved just like Ramp said. I wouldnt be surprised if we dealt him and say, Redman to another team. But I still think that is a misprint...

Encarnacion won't be back unless something wierd happens, he just costs to much for the team. thats where Vlad comes in with creative contract number two on the offseason for the Mahlins. Fish, I think Enc wont be back not because he costs too much, but because the market is saturated with better talent or at least better value. Guillen for example is cheaper. Vlad, well, he is one of the best in the game. If you have a chance to get a player like that, you do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



×
×
  • Create New...