i say 90-100 :w00t :hat :whistle :mischief2

that would be quite a turn around....

 

 

i said they would win 92 games......(back in ST)...

 

i cant go back on my picks, but it aint looking good

60-70 wins

 

 

 

One word:

 

 

 

INCONSISTENCY

 

 

 

 

Btw: What happen to the 71-74, 86-89, 101-104 mark?

 

Meaning the marlins can't win 73, 87, or 88 games? :mischief2 :shifty

We won 79 last year, and I thought in order to contend we would have to improve by 10 wins. I felt with the changes made we had enough to achieve this. That would mean 89 wins, but I think I have modified my expectations and I am looking more in the neighborhood of 80-85. We should be a .500 team at least, anything under that would be a disappointment. There is still a lot of season left, and no one has had the up-and downs we have had. In fact, no one has suffered the gross bad luck we have. Hopefully it will balance out.

Where's 50-60 wins? :confused Seriously, I said 75-85, with the total being on the low end of that bracket (probably more like 72 or 73 wins).

the reason we doing bad is cuz of pitchers 3 out and Micheal got hurt today ? i hope is nothin serious i dunno nothin cuz i was in the game.

we were on a 90 game win pace before the injuries?

 

 

 

 

where was i?

cuz i was in the game.

You play for The Marlins? WOW! :blink:

Where's 50-60 wins? :confused Seriously, I said 75-85, with the total being on the low end of that bracket (probably more like 72 or 73 wins).

I believe 60-65 is where we are headed, unless some kind of mid-season trades happen, and when we are hoovering around 30-40 wins at mid-way, I don't look for good things to happen that way, but possibly a lot of trades for prospects.

 

I look for a radically younger team, much CHEAPER team, and likely another 50-60 win season in 2004.

I say ummm...60-70 because we have been inconsistence in the past 30 games! We cannot turn this season around. We have to wait untill next season and see what happens.